| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 18:19 |
|
oh how quickly that could get abused by a troll.. just wait until someone puts someone elses name there and starts creating enemies
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 18:24 |
|
Yes calico - this was a concern of mine as well... for this reason alone, there should be a restriction where forum names must connect to the player's in game name.
Perhaps make a feature where the forum will send a code to the player's name in the game - and the in game player must validate the code to be able to post in the forums.
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 18:27 |
the reason my name isnt my ingame name is because i changed my ingame name a few months back :(
IM NOT A TROLL!!!
IM A ORC!!! WAAAGH!!!!
|
 |
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 18:55 |
Easier to say that staying in a powerful alliance Sunstorm. If forum names needs to be the same as ingame name, there will be a lot of diplo attacks against those smaller players who fail to respect the bigger ones. Ofcourse, the bigger ones would spit over anyone they wish and call it 'justice' (as we have seen only very recently). I wonder how many folks in the smaller alliances will want to have such a restriction.
Edited by Ander - 12 May 2012 at 18:56
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 20:28 |
I'm not a fan of trolls, but given the number of unpleasant mails I received since I posted in a recent thread (also many supportive ones, and thank you), I can understand why some people wouldn't want to use their in-game name.
However, I have not been diplo'd, militarily attacked or blighted, just told that I was on some people's naughty lists. Naturally it's not very nice to be on the naughty list of a fairly powerful neighbor, but my experience thus far has been that there has not been direct retribution.
In any case, while I prefer to identify myself and take my lumps, as it were, I can also understand why others might rather not.
Edited to add: Since nCrow is not yet a top 20 alliance, I think we could be categorized as a "smaller" alliance, although I prefer to think of us as a "not-yet-as-big-as-we-might-be-one-day" alliance.
Edited by Rill - 12 May 2012 at 20:31
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 20:40 |
Ander wrote:
Easier to say that staying in a powerful alliance Sunstorm. If forum names needs to be the same as ingame name, there will be a lot of diplo attacks against those smaller players who fail to respect the bigger ones. Ofcourse, the bigger ones would spit over anyone they wish and call it 'justice' (as we have seen only very recently). I wonder how many folks in the smaller alliances will want to have such a restriction. |
Ander, watch what you say to me or else I may just attack you... (that was a joke) (^_^) No, the point that was made is that I could create an account and call it "_______" which would not be my real in-game name. Then, if I called it "_______" and there was already a player in the game named "_______" - well, this player would get a bad rep for what I am posting. This is the issue. If someone created a forum account using the name of a different in game player, it would not go over well... That was the point.
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 20:48 |
|
Pardon me for interrupting the FUD party, but there are several players who use their in-game names here and actively "disrespect" or otherwise speak against the bigger players/alliances. Few if any can identify a single act against them that was provoked by their words here.
If you want to know how volatile and hostile the upper echelons are, check out "that big 35-page thread" that recently appeared. I'll be generous (from my perspective) and suggest that you assume the larger force was at fault. Note the magnitude of "transgressions" which triggered that outrage...and then note the lack of any other such threads over the last 6 months. Logically, there can only be 3 explanations: - that incident, however minor, was a major incident compared to the server-wide norm - hidden powers are normally very talented at hiding these incidents, and took the day off - any action involving certain players/alliances receives an entirely disproportionate amount of attention
It's possible that the last explanation means hostilities are more common and the actual inconsistency is with the supposed community influence. But at the very least you can take several names from that thread and match them to thriving in-game accounts. You can check their forum history and find a history of vocal dissent against much stronger powers. You can check their alliance history and probably also find at least a few who have little or no protection from significant political ties.
When I speak on these forums, few people ever see me or consider my words, but rather respond only to my position and the assumed bias that accompanies it. I can understand the desire to escape that from time to time, but I do not post under any other name because doing so would be at least a little deceptive.
Speaking anonymously is closely akin to sock puppetry, not to mention indistinguishable from it. And people are correct in correlating my position with my opinion. They may presume to reverse the causality--my opinions and standards have directed me into this position, not the other way around--but it is certainly appropriate and intelligent to at least consider the two together.
Hiding your identity also hides your agenda and bias, and most people who do so (at least here, but probably in general as well) are protecting that...not their cities. Because the community here is well-familiar with this situation--frequently reinforced by the perennial trolls--hiding your identity greatly diminishes the influence and credibility of your voice. That changes if your forum behavior demonstrates intellect and wisdom, but it's an up-hill battle. At least initially, people will associate new anonymous posters with the dismal characteristics of those anonymous posters we've previously encountered.
Even if you do not wish to reveal your identity, however, I'd strongly recommend you register your in-game account names here, lest in the future someone else miss-use your identity. And if you do wish to reveal your identity, note that anyone can put any name in a signature. At least forum names can only be registered once, which makes a standard relying exclusively on them the only way anyone can protect the credibility of their own voice.
|
|
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now." - HonoredMule
|
 |
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 20:57 |
|
I got warned by my Alliance after i Called you names HonoredMule :P a few months back in the improvements thread, they didnt want me to make you angry :P i didnt know who you were back then
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 21:00 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Pardon me for interrupting the FUD party,
|
Let's leave Linux users out of this one. They are completely innocent and I'm sure do not deserve the barrage of attacks and harassment that they are about to receive now that HM has brought them to the attention of the community.
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 12 May 2012 at 21:03 |
Rill wrote:
Edited to add: Since nCrow is not yet a top 20 alliance, I think we could be categorized as a "smaller" alliance, although I prefer to think of us as a "not-yet-as-big-as-we-might-be-one-day" alliance.
|
You are part of the Crowalition which I think most of the community recognizes as a single power block and the largest mega-alliance.
|
 |