| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
tansiraine 
Wordsmith
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Status: Offline
Points: 172
|
 Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 20:24 |
|
So being upset and venting cause someones word was broken is the same as sending scouts? gotcha... i will remember that for the future. thank you for the clarification on that
|
 |
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:57 |
ahhh so you posted this because you are upset at E.E. for scouting an warring enemy city that is in their territory, and you want to deteriorate E.E.'s public image by telling the rest of the community that no one can trust them.
I would think that insulting someone on the forums, saying they can't be trusted at all, and declaring your intent to remain in the alliance they are at war with is a much more hostile and aggressive action than sending scouts.
But wait, that doesn't make sense. You said you were staying out of all of this war business and remaining neutral. You just insulted the friends you were trying to avoid attacking in the first place. That doesn't really go with the neutral thing you were talking about.
Edited by geofrey - 18 Oct 2012 at 19:57
|
|
|
|
tansiraine
Wordsmith
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Location: pensacola FL
Status: Offline
Points: 172
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:48 |
|
that was the first time it happened... this is the second time it happened.
Yes we are at war i understand that.
Damage nothing it is the fact that the word of EE can not be trusted. End of conversation. yes i am upset and cranky
|
|
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:34 |
You've already gotten an apology and a "it wont happen again." But you made this post anyway... why? What are you hoping to get out of it? do you want payment for your losses?
How much damage did the scouts do?
How much gold will it take to replace all of your troops you lost, and the resources that have been stolen?
|
|
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:30 |
That is what I asked, if they are truly remaining neutral in an alliance in a war against someone else, why are they in that alliance?
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Glognar
New Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 12
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:17 |
 Loud Whispers wrote:
ES2 wrote:
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif" size="3">The idea that even in war, the fighting alliances should only hit targets who want to be hit is puzzling to me.. |
Much in the same way civilians don't want to be hit in war! |
Are they civilians? They are not providing any aid what so ever to any other person involved in the war? Including selling/buying anything on the market
|
|
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:05 |
Loud Whispers wrote:
ES2 wrote:
The idea that even in war, the fighting alliances should only hit targets who want to be hit is puzzling to me.. |
Much in the same way civilians don't want to be hit in war! |
Depends on how you look at it, a civilian making ammunition for the war? a civilian creating weapons for the war?
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Loud Whispers
Wordsmith
Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Location: Saltmines
Status: Offline
Points: 196
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 19:03 |
ES2 wrote:
The idea that even in war, the fighting alliances should only hit targets who want to be hit is puzzling to me.. |
Much in the same way civilians don't want to be hit in war!
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 18:56 |
Why is being scouted by an alliance at war with your current alliance deemed aggression? It's war, I would imagine if you don't want anyone looking over in your direction during war that you should leave the alliance in war with each other.
The idea that even in war, the fighting alliances should only hit targets who want to be hit is puzzling to me..
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Turgor
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 80
|
Posted: 18 Oct 2012 at 18:41 |
Tansi - information gathering on potential hostile targets so strategically placed as yourself is not aggressive. It is a fact of war. We are entitled to ensure our boundaries are secure.
If you feel uncomfortable with the fact that one of your EX-alliances is taking care of itself due to your ties, and you seek neutrality, you have the option to remove yourself from this war in a similar vein to some other ex-members of H? If not, that can only be taken as a statement you intend on not remaining neutral to other members of Consone, and any argument of neutrality is therefore null and void.
You are no longer in EE. You have no say in the trustworthyness of members you left in the way you did. Please refrain from doing so.
There is no reason for your mourning, or indeed this whole thread. EE is a strong alliance and will continue to grow and be strong.
|
|
Tweet
EE / Consone Agression
