| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
ES2 
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
 Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 18:17 |
 Vibs wrote:
ES2 wrote:
Does that mean other crow alliances will back Kcrow then? |
I don't speak for all the crows. Just KCrow. Our support of STEEL is independent as of now and is limited to defending STEEL cities. |
I was just wondering, say hypothetically Kcrow starts losing in combat and starts losing cities, I didn't see other crow alliances watching them fall.
Edited by ES2 - 26 Sep 2012 at 18:51
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
 |
Sir A
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 121
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 18:27 |
Sir Bradly wrote:
Just to be clear Sir Angus, NC is not complaining. We just trying to set the facts straight so the community can judge the conflict based on truth rather than deception.
|
And what are these facts? Just so there are no discrepancies with our understanding.
ES2 wrote:
Vibs wrote:
ES2 wrote:
Does that mean other crow alliances will back Kcrow then? |
I don't speak for all the crows. Just KCrow. Our support of STEEL is independent as of now and is limited to defending STEEL cities. |
I was just wondering, say hypothetically Kcrow starts losing in combat and starts losing cities, I didn't see other crow alliances watching them fall. |
War is war, we are prepared for attacks on our cities, as far as other crow confeds joining in, we will let things unfold as they do.
|
|
Darmon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 18:28 |
ES2 wrote:
Vibs wrote:
ES2 wrote:
Does that mean other crow alliances will back Kcrow then? |
I don't speak for all the crows. Just KCrow. Our support of STEEL is independent as of now and is limited to defending STEEL cities. |
I was just wondering, say hypothetically Kcrow starts losing in combat and starts losing cities, I didn't see other crow alliances watching them fall. |
I don't get the impression it will come to that, since KCrow has only committed themselves as far as defending STEEL cities (though, who knows, maybe they'll get in deeper later). Which, really, is the only rational way to approach the defense of Gim. Anything else seems like fighting fire with fire. Though, I suppose it is one way to end a war: start one and then win it. Guess we'll see how that turns out for DARK.
Edited by Darmon - 26 Sep 2012 at 18:46
|
|
ES2
Postmaster
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 18:50 |
Can we agree that sending troops or diplomats (attached to an army) to people in war with someone else constitutes as sending aid and therefor can be retaliated with attacks on the people who then sent said aid?
|
|
Eternal Fire
|
|
Darmon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 18:55 |
ES2 wrote:
Can we agree that sending troops or diplomats (attached to an army) to people in war with someone else constitutes as sending aid and therefor can be retaliated with attacks on the people who then sent said aid? |
Certainly. I hope you'd be hard pressed to find someone who disagrees. The question really becomes, does NC want to take things in that direction? Every impression I've been given is that they have eyes only for Gim. Or...you know what I mean.
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 19:12 |
All things are permissible, but not all things are profitable.
|
|
Darmon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 19:32 |
Rill wrote:
All things are permissible, but not all things are profitable.
|
I still have no idea what NC's actual goal is in this incident, so I don't know what they hope to gain. Do they really want to wipe Gim off the map, or just humble him a bit?
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 19:59 |
Princess Xanax wrote:
Vanerin wrote:
Sir Bradly,
Perhaps you did not read properly what Sisren wrote. You speak of "<span style=": rgb255, 248, 229; ">100% of all military attacks directed at Gimardoran's cities</span>" while Sisren said "<span style=": rgb255, 248, 229; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; line-height: normal; ">...members of Dark Empire have fallen victim to Diplomatic attacks." </span>I do not see Sisren claiming any military attacks on Dark, but I do not see you addressing the diplomatic attacks mentioned.
~Vanerin
|
We sent no diplo attacks on Dark. Scouts only, which is not an attack. But, believe what you will.
|
Princess Xanax, I would like to thank you- you confirmed our suspicions that the origin was ~NC~. My reservation in this was that it was not, as Myr told me in IGM an attack from ~NC~. Imagine, had I believed Myr- it would have been bad. This gives me personally some relief at least... Oh, and a scout not being an attack... Yeah, you should reconsider that. Knowledge is power. Dark has always seen it as such, ask Myr. She was with for a bit. Au revoir
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 20:07 |
|
Why bother sending reports you already have bradly?
Xanax said nc sent them already.
Speaking of facts, this occurred before you lot said you were attacking steel militarily.
You are getting no reports, or further talk from Dark on that.
;)
Bon appetit
|
|
Darmon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
|
Posted: 26 Sep 2012 at 20:26 |
|
I wish you presented a more clear timeline, Sisren. I feel like this whole thread is about semantics over dubious wording.
|
|
Tweet
Dark Empire Writ of Notice-War Declaration ~NC~