Crow the Mega Alliance

King EAM wrote: Lord Loss wrote: Your call makes no sense, just because they have lots of members doesn't mean we should attack them, i mean the same can be said for the Curse of The Wolves and Harmless , they both have lots if members and are both very powerful, does that mean we are going to attack them? HELL no! they'll kill us all...... slowly  Because of this I'm going to ignore your call and watch this resistance fail.. For further reference if something like this is open and no one has posted on it for a while just leave it alone and don't make it a live forum again.

Your call makes no sense, just because they have lots of members doesn't mean we should attack them, i mean the same can be said for the Curse of The Wolves and Harmless , they both have lots if members and are both very powerful, does that mean we are going to attack them? HELL no! they'll kill us all...... slowly 

GM Stormcrow wrote: Hi all, To confirm: we don't generally talk about why people's accounts are suspended. However, in the case of a player who has publically stated that he is abandoning an account, we don't mind confirming the fact - for the avoidance of doubt. Regards, SC

at the risk of getting King EAM to accuse me of posting just to get post counts, what do you mean SC? can you dumb that down?

Gratch wrote: He was only inevitably answering what you asked and it is not a breach of privacy if TCO before posted on the forums he was leaving. He therefore did not mind people knowing he was leaving the game so it would seem pointless that it would need to be kept secret that he requested it.

But is he really leaving the game or is he closing his account and starting a new one that people don't know about? If he says he's quitting, provided people believe him, no one is going to suspect he will continue to play. Now that people know his account is shut down then in turn know that he might make a new account. So now it's possible the next guy to publicly dislike the Crows might get tags as TCO. It's possible none of this will happen but it still seems like information that shouldn't have been given.

Gratch wrote: Also by just telling you the reason for his suspension it immediately expels any implications or thoughts of any other reason he may hav e been suspended (for any actions or other such things)

But why would that matter? If he's gone, he's gone. It doesn't matter why. If he's actually quit, he certainly shouldn't care what people thought of him and if he hasn't quit, regardless of why his account was suspended people didn't seem to think very highly of him anyway. It's possible he asked for his account to be closed simply because of his bad reputation so furthering it shouldn't matter.

Brids17 wrote: GM Stormcrow wrote: The Con Orc was suspended ingame (added to the deletion queue) at his own request via Petition. Should you really people telling people that? It doesn't make much difference but it seems like a breach of privacy to me, especially considering he requested for the account to be closed.

He was only inevitably answering what you asked and it is not a breach of privacy if TCO before posted on the forums he was leaving. He therefore did not mind people knowing he was leaving the game so it would seem pointless that it would need to be kept secret that he requested it.

Also by just telling you the reason for his suspension it immediately expels any implications or thoughts of any other reason he may hav e been suspended (for any actions or other such things)