crow member hotattack

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

now now... bad gaming culture????

i respect your opinion that it may seem cheap, but i would really appreciate if you would not try to force your point of view on others by making a GM change this.
That would be really rude and a symptom of intolerance toward those that benefit from this useful game function  that is city capturing.
i understand that some may take pride in their own cities and their hard work on those...
but for non prestige user as myself this has proven an useful game mechanic quite some times already. 

Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:07

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Kilotov of DokGthung Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 723	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:07
	now now... bad gaming culture???? i respect your opinion that it may seem cheap, but i would really appreciate if you would not try to force your point of view on others by making a GM change this. That would be really rude and a symptom of intolerance toward those that benefit from this useful game function that is city capturing. i understand that some may take pride in their own cities and their hard work on those... but for non prestige user as myself this has proven an useful game mechanic quite some times already. Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:07

Tordenkaffen Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:10
	Well I stand by my opinion Kilo - regardless if it is inconvenient to you.

Nokigon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster General Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:17
	Players are eventually removed from the alliance, and THEN the game.

Tordenkaffen Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:21
	No they are not - they are - as the rules/game mechanics are now - removed from the game after a longer period of inactivity - this period can be extended by appointing a sitter at the inactivity offset by up to 3 months, but the players are NOT kicked from their alliance throughout their inactivity. I think that inactivity should cancel out any form of false protection/conservation. Free for all, fair for all. Edited by Tordenkaffen - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:23

Sloter Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Status: Offline Points: 304	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:23
	It is common practis among most alliances to keep larger inactivs for their cities to be taken by new players and thus speed up their growt, not everyone uses prestige and it means alot to get large city with alll research done.Only few alliances are not doing tha.

Kilotov of DokGthung Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 723	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:25
	well i see your towns are big, torden. and it seem to me that you are kinda stomping on the ground cause non prestige user can get towns fast whit out paying a cent... its evony like to consider that since you pay, you have to be " bigger and better" no offence meant. Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:27

Tordenkaffen Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:27
	@Sloter: Just underlines my point of a bad/rotten gaming culture, people are actively seeking out the loopholes now. Rules need to be: You get what you build, otherwise investing time and money in Illy is a complete waste so long as a completely new player can do these kinds of leaps and ultimately make your hard earned work and progress worthless. Its decadent and exploitative - period.

Tordenkaffen Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:29
	Its Evony-like to think that because there is an exploit you should use it in good conscience. The fact that you do it so blatantly just shows how bad things are developing at the moment. And yeah Kilo - If you check my history Im sure youll see that Ive spent more time on this game than most.

(EOM) Harry Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 06 Oct 2010 Status: Offline Points: 283	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:34
	Sorry mate, i forgot Valar and nice and clean and oh so up standing in this game, and yet you seem to be placing all your Valar towns outside Hubs, not allowing any non-confederate alliances to get a look in, oh so very clean! What was that word that started with Hy- and ending with pocrisy...
	Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart.

Nokigon Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster General Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452	Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:35
	I'm sorry Tord, but you're incorrect. I've watched people disappear from inactive alliances, without losing their towns. I can give you an example if you like: LadyBreni. Her towns were sieged by Champ, but she was removed from the alliance.