Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - crow member hotattack
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedcrow member hotattack

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Author
Kilotov of DokGthung View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:07
now now... bad gaming culture????

i respect your opinion that it may seem cheap, but i would really appreciate if you would not try to force your point of view on others by making a GM change this.
That would be really rude and a symptom of intolerance toward those that benefit from this useful game function  that is city capturing.
i understand that some may take pride in their own cities and their hard work on those...
but for non prestige user as myself this has proven an useful game mechanic quite some times already.


Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:07
Back to Top
Tordenkaffen View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:10
Well I stand by my opinion Kilo - regardless if it is inconvenient to you.
Back to Top
Nokigon View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Historian

Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:17
Players are eventually removed from the alliance, and THEN the game.
Back to Top
Tordenkaffen View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:21
No they are not - they are - as the rules/game mechanics are now - removed from the game after a longer period of inactivity - this period can be extended by appointing a sitter at the inactivity offset by up to 3 months, but the players are NOT kicked from their alliance throughout their inactivity.

I think that inactivity should cancel out any form of false protection/conservation. Free for all, fair for all.


Edited by Tordenkaffen - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:23
Back to Top
Sloter View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 14 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 304
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:23
It is common practis among most alliances to keep larger inactivs for their cities to be taken by new players and thus speed up their growt, not everyone uses prestige and it means alot to get large city with alll research done.Only few alliances are not doing tha.
Back to Top
Kilotov of DokGthung View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 07 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 723
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:25
well i see your towns are big, torden.
and it seem to me that you are kinda stomping on the ground cause non prestige user can get towns fast whit out paying a cent...
its evony like to consider that since you pay, you have to be " bigger and better"

no offence meant.



Edited by Kilotov of DokGthung - 27 Aug 2011 at 18:27
Back to Top
Tordenkaffen View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:27
@Sloter: Just underlines my point of a bad/rotten gaming culture, people are actively seeking out the loopholes now.

Rules need to be: You get what you build, otherwise investing time and money in Illy is a complete waste so long as a completely new player can do these kinds of leaps and ultimately make your hard earned work and progress worthless.

Its decadent and exploitative - period.
Back to Top
Tordenkaffen View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:29
Its Evony-like to think that because there is an exploit you should use it in good conscience. The fact that you do it so blatantly just shows how bad things are developing at the moment.

And yeah Kilo - If you check my history Im sure youll see that Ive spent more time on this game than most.

Back to Top
(EOM) Harry View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 06 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 283
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:34
Sorry mate, i forgot Valar and nice and clean and oh so up standing in this game, and yet you seem to be placing all your Valar towns outside Hubs, not allowing any non-confederate alliances to get a look in, oh so very clean!
What was that word that started with Hy- and ending with pocrisy...
Fool's watch the land when the problem is in the heart.
Back to Top
Nokigon View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Historian

Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Aug 2011 at 18:35
I'm sorry Tord, but you're incorrect. I've watched people disappear from inactive alliances, without losing their towns. I can give you an example if you like: LadyBreni. Her towns were sieged by Champ, but she was removed from the alliance.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.