Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Conquering capitals
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedConquering capitals

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 21:02
"I just feel that players need a way of removing things in their way."

I understand your viewpoint but it is not one with which I can sympathize.  It's simply too selfish.  Much to the contrary, I feel that players need to be forced to deal with their neighborhood responsibly (or at least invest some hard work) rather than terraforming it from the comfort of their armchairs.
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 21:08
When you remove any sense of consequences, the world degenerates into a thug fest.  I've played games that let people squeeze neighbors out of the game (Tribal Wars).  It sucked royally.  Even after I established a successful multi-city empire, I ended up quitting out of sheer boredom with the mindless slugging and complete lack of higher strategy or social maturity.
Back to Top
Jim View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 22:25
Mule. Its a war game. If it wasn't we wouldnt have armies would we ?
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Apr 2010 at 22:27
By that logic, real life is a war game.  I'm glad differently minded people run some of our nations.

It's also an argument completely auxiliary to whether achieving solidarity from a position of advantage should be easy.


Edited by HonoredMule - 01 Apr 2010 at 22:38
Back to Top
Kumomoto View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Apr 2010 at 17:21
Originally posted by Jim Jim wrote:

Mule. Its a war game. If it wasn't we wouldnt have armies would we ?
 
Jim-- It's a war and diplomacy and magic and trading and city building game... War is one element, not the only element of the game, and the most successful players (and alliances) will balance those.
Back to Top
Jim View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 33
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Apr 2010 at 15:03
Of course it is. And the great challenge and difficulty for the players, but even moreso, the designers is to get that balance right. Not sure whether it is too in favour of the pacifists who basically want nothing to ever happen, but time will tell. Mule thinks I am some kind of bloodthirsty barbarian :). If I am then so is every chess player out there. Chess is the ultimate war game.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.