Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Claims of Ignoration of Claims
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Claims of Ignoration of Claims
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Diva View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 20 Dec 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 416 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Diva Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Jul 2015 at 01:30
Originally posted by Han Dynasty Han Dynasty wrote:

 

I also wonder how many players in Illyriad are comfortable, or have been comfortable with the peacenik atmosphere. It could very well be that the majority have been uncomfortable, but have been subjugated by the minority that possesses the military prowess. 

You're directly challenging and threatening with vast destruction. How could anyone look at it and say 'yep, they're just interested in settlement as well'. 


Peacenik... ok, planned PvP going on down in BL (short of the opposition to Land Claims) isn't peacenik type? With negotiations on who is participating, which cities cannot be attacked 

...There isn't any kind of legitimate PvP going that you think BL should have going on.

BL is just an extension for ROOM, and we know when that happened. And we also know the devs planned it another way that didn't develop.. so now you are forcing conflict ALL over BL your way, with land claims... 

And please, mention who runs Elgea, that can't in BL, which is why this is headed the way it is due to them?
"Um diva.... you are sort of acting like a .... diva...." - PhoenixFire
Back to Top
Han Dynasty View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2014
Location: Kingdom of Shu
Status: Offline
Points: 123 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Han Dynasty Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jul 2015 at 07:30
Originally posted by Halcyon Halcyon wrote:

10 alliances, most of them very small, have claimed about 15 percent of Broken Lands (that's what my eyes are telling me when looking at Jejune's map). This means that a relatively small part of the players are trying to dictate to the majority where to place their cities. It won't stand.
Dark Shade does not recognize these claims and, like Invictus, will ignore them.
We do not settle inside a land claim with an intention to force a conflict, but we settle where our strategy indicates even if this means settling inside a land claim. Military or diplomatic actions against our cities will be answered with disproportionate military action.
Don't start none, won't be none!

If you are settling within a land claim, it is with the intention to force a conflict. You not recognizing a land claim is well within your 'right', and certainly refusal to recognize claims is to be expected, but you can't hide behind 'but we're not forcing conflict'. 

I also wonder how many players in Illyriad are comfortable, or have been comfortable with the peacenik atmosphere. It could very well be that the majority have been uncomfortable, but have been subjugated by the minority that possesses the military prowess. 

You're directly challenging and threatening with vast destruction. How could anyone look at it and say 'yep, they're just interested in settlement as well'. 
The official forum profile for Han Dynasty.
Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Halcyon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Jul 2015 at 06:55
10 alliances, most of them very small, have claimed about 15 percent of Broken Lands (that's what my eyes are telling me when looking at Jejune's map). This means that a relatively small part of the players are trying to dictate to the majority where to place their cities. It won't stand.
Dark Shade does not recognize these claims and, like Invictus, will ignore them.
We do not settle inside a land claim with an intention to force a conflict, but we settle where our strategy indicates even if this means settling inside a land claim. Militray or diplomatic actions against our cities will be answered with disproportionate military action.
Don't start none, won't be none!
Back to Top
Hora View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hora Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 2015 at 14:21
Official Statement of Invictus regarding the Land Claims:

Dear fellow Illyrians,

The recent weeks have seen some land claims in the BL, and VIC was asked, whether they'd like to do one, too.

In short: We won't.

Invictus is a big and widespread alliance, defining a heartland would be difficult. 

Further, why should we restrict other players?
On the other hand, why should they restrict us? 

We Consuls of VIC are suspiciously watching the new territories and their future development. 
We won't intervene right now, as we don't have a reason to do so, but we won't recognize any claims in or widely around High Hills for now.

Don't be afraid, we plan no counter claim, or anything... 
We'll just ignore!

That means business as usual: Settling/harvesting accidents will be solved diplomatically. Intentional actions against our units (be it by claim or not) won't be tolerated. We stay true to the widely accepted 10-square-please-ask-before-settling radius.

Claiming alliances concerned about this statement will recieve a more detailed IGM and are encouraged to ask any questions appearing also directly via IGM to keep this thread clean. Thank you.

Kindest regards,
the Consuls of Invictus



Edited by Hora - 06 Jun 2015 at 14:23
Back to Top
Hora View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hora Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Jun 2015 at 14:19
Hi fellow Illyrians,

some big alliances made statements neither related to firm claims nor fixed counter/anti-claims or rigid no claim zones.
So far those statements had been moved to the discussion thread, where they are lost between all the talk about general pros and cons.

This thread is planed to collect the statements of ignoration and denial. Please keep it as free of discussion as the other official thread...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.