Claims of Ignoration of Claims

I realize it was many years ago and I was only a kid but as I remember on several ocassions and Myr being only one example we enforced the land claim area and in fact basically siege a former leader out of the game...as I remember both the alliance soon and WOT gave their blessing and were deemed off limits to our very aggressive play....that dark used the soup war as an excuse to push out both Vic and EE from our joint land claim. I will agree that current leadership were in growth stages but all were large enough accounts to actively support the western land claim. My question is why the change to be against plus we must all admit that the land claim was fun and exciting play. personally I believe that wide spread permasat and the laughable 90 day deletion rule ruined the early land claim strategy and doomed it until recent changes...so many accounts just sat and the game went out of whack with inactivity and wait for the next tournament play style instead of constant competitive play...winks at devs m

Edited by twilights - 29 Jul 2015 at 00:12

And you diploed ME ay a LATER time. I did not like it!

Thorgrim wrote: twilights wrote: I realize it was many years ago and I was only a kid but as I remember on several ocassions and Myr being only one example we enforced the land claim area and in fact basically siege a former leader out of the game...as I remember both the alliance soon and WOT gave their blessing and were deemed off limits to our very aggressive play....that dark used the soup war as an excuse to push out both Vic and EE from our joint land claim. I will agree that current leadership were in growth stages but all were large enough accounts to actively support the western land claim. My question is why the change to be against plus we must all admit that the land claim was fun and exciting play. personally I believe that wide spread permasat and the laughable 90 day deletion rule ruined the early land claim strategy and doomed it until recent changes...so many accounts just sat and the game went out of whack with inactivity and wait for the next tournament play style instead of constant competitive play...winks at devs m That proves my point. Thank you for being open, Twi :)

Edited by Halcyon - 29 Jul 2015 at 12:06

Twi brought up the Consone war, though she called it "Soup".

Halcyon wrote: Thorgrim wrote: twilights wrote: I realize it was many years ago and I was only a kid but as I remember on several ocassions and Myr being only one example we enforced the land claim area and in fact basically siege a former leader out of the game...as I remember both the alliance soon and WOT gave their blessing and were deemed off limits to our very aggressive play....that dark used the soup war as an excuse to push out both Vic and EE from our joint land claim. I will agree that current leadership were in growth stages but all were large enough accounts to actively support the western land claim. My question is why the change to be against plus we must all admit that the land claim was fun and exciting play. personally I believe that wide spread permasat and the laughable 90 day deletion rule ruined the early land claim strategy and doomed it until recent changes...so many accounts just sat and the game went out of whack with inactivity and wait for the next tournament play style instead of constant competitive play...winks at devs m That proves my point. Thank you for being open, Twi :) 1. Twi always says her mind outright. 2. this does not mean that she is always right.