Claims of Ignoration of Claims |
Post Reply | Page <12345 9> |
Author | |
GM Rikoo
Moderator Group Community & PR Manager Joined: 28 Mar 2014 Location: Mars Status: Offline Points: 1233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
You cannot post an anti-land claim post in the land claim thread. I will also begin deleting posts that are attempting to goad or troll the conversation or topic. (Not you, Diva, I am referring to someone else.) When a thread is made as a legitimate attempt at discussion or information-gathering, I will police it. We already have too many good threads destroyed by off-topic banter. If a poster continues to post off-topic posts, let me know. Eventually I will have to ban the person from the forums. Thanks! Continue on! GM Rikoo
|
|
Illyriad Community Manager / Public Relations / community@illyriad.co.uk
|
|
Diva
Forum Warrior Joined: 20 Dec 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Rikoo says:
You cannot post an anti-land claim post in the land claim thread. Then how can JeJune post/place a anti-land claim on a map in Alliance Land Claims that WoT has not claimed.. we are not only located in Aindara.. this is FALSE and his doing only. I have NOT posted an Alliance Land Claim, therefore should NOT be on his map.
|
|
"Um diva.... you are sort of acting like a .... diva...." - PhoenixFire
|
|
GM Rikoo
Moderator Group Community & PR Manager Joined: 28 Mar 2014 Location: Mars Status: Offline Points: 1233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I cannot control his map. I can control the forums, though. Rikoo
|
|
Illyriad Community Manager / Public Relations / community@illyriad.co.uk
|
|
Diva
Forum Warrior Joined: 20 Dec 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Alright, again, let it be said ... for the map itself, WOT has never made a land claim, and the demarcation on the JeJune map is false and assumed.
LOUD and clear JeJune?
|
|
"Um diva.... you are sort of acting like a .... diva...." - PhoenixFire
|
|
King korr
Greenhorn Joined: 07 Oct 2012 Location: england Status: Offline Points: 66 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Let me expand on this Say Alliance A has claimed a region next to WoT we have no cities in that region. BUT they have a few cities in Ainoara, where we have cities. What would stop Alliance A claiming a second region as their alliance expands and needs more harvest able location so then WoT would either have to go bow to this alliance demands to settle in a region we've been, be kicked out or go to war. Seeing as how WoT as a whole is against land claims and won't avoid region's where there are some, and will defend members right's to settle anywhere (out side of 10sq radius of course), and will use ALL means to defend our right to do so. How this makes use grey i don't know as we not saying we're against land claims but will just stay in our location's we are actively settling where members want to and informed alliance's close to use that if they stick to their land claims it will bring them in to conflict with us. Also we don't believe alliance's should be able to have their cake and eat it as the saying goes if you want a region to your self you should
Edited by King korr - 08 Jul 2015 at 17:19 |
|
Wartow
Postmaster Joined: 20 May 2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 920 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Can I toss another hypothetical out there? Assume I am an alliance with a land claim. I play nicely and keep my business to my claimed area. Perhaps I send a few traders out of the claimed area to get my goods to market which does benefit all in the game. What if I am associated with another alliance, perhaps a training, feeder, or sister alliance, without a claim that sets up pockets of cities (all over the world) for harvesting those resources not found in the claimed area? Are these other alliances free to do as they will? Even if they have known alts from the claiming alliance leading them up? Now... this is a tremendous tribute the organization power of a group of players in the game... but isn't this also "having the cake and eating it too"? Or do we fundamentally disassociate the actions of a player and that player's alt? Or two alliances with close ties?
|
|
|
|
Beyljr
Wordsmith Joined: 12 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 157 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Extremely well put Jejune! This is the real benefit of the whole LC process. Not as a means of generating conflict where there wouldn't be conflict otherwise, but as a public service announcement to help people determine where they wish to settle, and what to expect if they settle in a particular area. I do so wish that people would stop trying to turn a public service into a reason for conflict. Everyone has boundaries, and always have. This is just providing an easy way of identifying where they are. You can still settle anywhere you wish, but atleast now you can know in advance what to expect, who will be friendly with you, and who will not be friendly with you, when you do. Diva, deciding to ignore LCs is perfectly acceptable. Most people that make an LC won't act any different toward anyone whether or not the LC is written down somewhere or has exactly defined boundaries. This has nothing to do with defining a new way of behaving. But at the same time I agree with the people that say that your statement that you will not accept certain people settling in your area, is infact a land claim. An "old style" land claim, where people can't tell for certain where the boundaries are, and therefore can never really know what to expect from you. The type of land claim that we all ran into in Elgea before BL even existed. The very type of land claim that makes LCs so desirable in BL. And that is a valid way of doing business if that is your choice. People aren't restricting the way you operate. And we are asking that you not try to restrict the way that we operate. Just like it is fine if you don't want to specify exact boundaries for your land claim, and it is also fine if you wish to ignore other people's stated boundaries, it should also be fine if someone else does choose to state them. As the old saying goes, "what is good for the goose, is good for the gander". If you want tolerance of your desires, then you have to tolerate other people's desires. Enjoy. |
|
twilights
Postmaster Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
let me be clear on my personal stance on this issue..if either side lays a seige in my backyard I will use my assets to try to break it...you can attack. raid. or dip each other around me but I will not stay idle if seige is used...around my locations it is a war free seige zone and will remain so until the devs make changes to make its damage more in line with other functions..good luck and have fun but no use of what I consider out of whack war game functions around me with me watching
|
|
Diva
Forum Warrior Joined: 20 Dec 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Again, people like to interpret something different for their use to whitewash and or discredit. My post is on the ANTI-LAND claim thread, our policy is on our Alliance page, which you assume people to read on yours as well INSTEAD of coming to look at the Alliance Land Claims here in the forums.
The borders on your map signifying where WOT DID NOT SAY it was EVER claiming (assumed by JeJune if you look on THE LAND CLAIMER'S map) As the old saying goes --- I won't post it so Rikoo has a reason to ban me or close the thread. Definitely has the TWISTING of intent to your benefit though. I see no other Anti-land claim on your map, and what TVM does is what TVM said, don't compare what has not been said. Tell me where I posted a anti - land claim to any area of Broken Lands that should be on that map, PLEASE. I thought so. No where.
Edited by Diva - 08 Jul 2015 at 23:51 |
|
"Um diva.... you are sort of acting like a .... diva...." - PhoenixFire
|
|
Raco
Greenhorn Joined: 29 May 2015 Location: Here Status: Offline Points: 42 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12345 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |