Chasing war runners the WRONG way |
Post Reply 
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
DeliciousJosh 
Forum Warrior 
Joined: 14 Jun 2012 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 417 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 07 Sep 2018 at 19:45 |
|
Hey, I'm happy to get some action that is predictable and ongoing.
I did try and reach out to Laga but i didn't get very far running into a wall with the suggestions I had. A donkey comes to mind with stubbornness. this seems fitting #GetOverIt |
|
|
PublicRelations HumanResources |
|
 |
|
|
Gragnog
Postmaster 
Joined: 28 Nov 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 Sep 2018 at 18:02 |
|
This is such a fun thread. Bottom line is Laga is just lucky SIN got bored and left. They were on the verge of pummelling mCrow into the dust but punching a baby is morally wrong( even one as pathetic as Laga). He is now bitter and actually quite unable to make and headway against Josh anyway so his claim of Chasing War Runners is mute. All he is doing is japping loudly at Josh’s ankles. Now everyone just move along and let the little puppy continue his japping. We actually find him quite cute.
|
|
|
Kaggen is my human half
|
|
|
|
|
Lagavulin
Wordsmith
Joined: 31 Dec 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 187 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 Sep 2018 at 16:49 |
|
mCrow is still at war with SIN. Players who left SIN are still at war with us until they make individual peace. Some have made peace, many have not. This exactly mirrors SIN's own policy. Quoted below from SIN's alliance page (same applies to Ex TA2IN and for the same reason) "Persistant Pursuit Notice
Beginning July 18, players in alliances engaging in hostile military operations against SIN are considered "enemy combatants" and cannot leave their alliance and avoid hostile action during war or other confrontations without first agreeing to individual surrender terms. If SIN has siege operations inbound to an enemy combatant who leaves an allaince at war with SIN, sieges will continue. Absent of formal surrender terms and a peace agreement between SIN and an opposing alliance, all members who attempt to leave the war will be pursued to the fullest extent of SIN's military until or unless individual surrender terms are reached, irrespective of remaining unaffiliated or joining another alliance." bold added by me. (Yes. The misspelling of Persistent is how they posted it on their alliance page. Get over it.) (There is much more to all sides of these wars over the last year and a bit. I have refrained from commenting much about them and think that is still a good policy as it just degenerates into we say/they say. Everyone can safely assume we have answers to the statements against us and do not agree with QBs view or even all her claims of "fact.") |
|
|
|
|
Lumelthien
New Poster 
Joined: 06 Nov 2013 Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 Sep 2018 at 15:04 |
No, it's difficult to make that charge stick. Chasing players down after a war has ended and peace was declared =/= threatening players for their actions before and during and after a tournament. If QB thinks the first one is low and wrong, but that the second was justified, then she is not being hypocritcal. You can disagree with her reasoning, but she's not necessarily being a hypocrite.
Edited by Lumelthien - 07 Sep 2018 at 15:05 |
|
|
|
|
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 Sep 2018 at 10:19 |
|
Seems pretty hypocritical to complain about this when QB was involved with threatening Ascn players with sieges just because Ascn were doing so well in the tournament.
|
|
|
This is the thread that never ends, yes it goes on and on my friend. Some person started it, not knowing what it was, and we'll continue posting on it forever just because...
|
|
|
|
|
Grom
Wordsmith
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Location: Mal Motsha Status: Offline Points: 170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Sep 2018 at 21:40 |
It never does. Anyway, just chimed in with my two cents. Of course he can do what he wants, and he'll be fully responsible for it. |
|
|
|
|
Bill_Cipher
Wordsmith
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 Location: Everywhere Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Sep 2018 at 21:31 |
|
He is the leader.
I believe he has the right to do as he pleases. Complaining doesn't really help Edited by Bill_Cipher - 06 Sep 2018 at 21:32 |
|
|
Let fate chase you not me
|
|
|
|
|
Grom
Wordsmith
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Location: Mal Motsha Status: Offline Points: 170 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Sep 2018 at 21:20 |
|
I don't think the policy itself is the issue. Nothing wrong with preventing the enemy from rebuilding troops while hiding in a neutral alliance. The question in this case is why Laga is doing this alone, without the support of his alliance. He is, by himself, antagonizing multiple alliances, who would prefer to remain at peace with mCrow, up to the point that enduring peace is no longer a given.
|
|
|
|
|
King Sigerius
Greenhorn 
Joined: 11 Nov 2017 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 91 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Sep 2018 at 20:41 |
|
Quit crying QB, the people he is perusing have been doing the same thing for years. Now that you are on the other end it sounds like you don't like it. I know many many people driven out of the game by sin and now it's all of a sudden too small of a game to fight? Now it's time to end a policy that if sin remained an alliance would of remained a policy? Lol too funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Bill_Cipher
Wordsmith
Joined: 30 Aug 2018 Location: Everywhere Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 Sep 2018 at 20:22 |
|
Stop with the bullsh it...then again that's all you ever say so why don't you just shut up in general?
They are just doing what SIN has done... How is that now fair? Edited by Bill_Cipher - 06 Sep 2018 at 20:24 |
|
|
Let fate chase you not me
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
eowan the short wrote: