| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Topic: bullies Posted: 17 Oct 2010 at 02:23 |
TGE wrote:
I can vouch for him, he is a slaver. |
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
TGE
New Poster
Joined: 21 Jul 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 30
|
Posted: 14 Oct 2010 at 22:29 |
|
I can vouch for him, he is a slaver.
|
Comic Sans started global warming
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 14 Oct 2010 at 17:38 |
liberty6 wrote:
lorre wrote:
im the biggest bullie on this game so meh did noone see my enslavement tactics? /me feels unwubzed |
i saw them but as far as i know you aren't slaving anyone i won't call that out
|
they are my slaves i tell ya!
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
liberty6
Wordsmith
Joined: 04 Jul 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 131
|
Posted: 14 Oct 2010 at 17:16 |
lorre wrote:
im the biggest bullie on this game so meh did noone see my enslavement tactics? /me feels unwubzed |
i saw them but as far as i know you aren't slaving anyone i won't call that out
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 14 Oct 2010 at 17:10 |
|
im the biggest bullie on this game so meh did noone see my enslavement tactics? /me feels unwubzed
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
liberty6
Wordsmith
Joined: 04 Jul 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 131
|
Posted: 14 Oct 2010 at 02:51 |
|
quite now please this is just a little call out not a discussion yes the bullies go in the end if you've heard or read one of the testements which one i don't know or care!!!!!! its an eye for an eye so it is kind of poetic justice i am personally trying to protect one of my members unfortunately military goes so far diplo units do more damage in many cases and you defend yourself in that case. know unfortunately i don't have the strength. he is bigger than me. i am done debating and im thinking of a thread close request.
|
 |
G0DsDestroyer
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Location: Ásgarð/Vanaheim
Status: Offline
Points: 975
|
Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 18:22 |
Taron wrote:
Redfist wrote:
Any accuser should detail the accusation in full; providing evidence where necessary. The accused should also be given the right to reply.
|
Didn't you stop playing? so why are you on the forums? |
Why should u have an opinion when u were booted from the game? 
|
|
|
 |
Taron
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Oct 2010
Location: Hell Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 81
|
Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 17:44 |
Redfist wrote:
Any accuser should detail the accusation in full; providing evidence where necessary. The accused should also be given the right to reply.
|
Didn't you stop playing? so why are you on the forums?
|
|
I am Responsible for what I say. I Am not responsible for what you understand.
|
 |
Grunvagr
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 61
|
Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 15:52 |
lol I just meant top alliances (that's plural) have huge armies. Players respect them and are jealous (wanna be them) because of the power they possess. easy on the block paragraphs! some of us haven't had coffee yet!
Edited by Grunvagr - 12 Oct 2010 at 16:41
|
 |
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 09:34 |
|
Grunvagr, can you clarify the statement "they are pro thugs?" I can't tell what it is you're saying.
In case its relevant, I'd like to point out a couple things regarding Harmless's behavior and stance:
1) We have an unspoken hands-off policy regarding 3rd party troubles. Any bullies we've set straight earned our wrath not for being thugs, but for exercising their thuggery against players under our protection. More talented bullies know better than to bite off more than they can chew.
2) We do not believe in fair retribution for offenses...at least not as many here seem to define it. Our alliance tag and that of our sister alliance carry weight. If you hit a player under our protection, we will hit you, and we will hit harder. Persist, and we'll hit harder and harder until there's nothing left to hit. The message is clear: hitting our players hurts you more than us, so don't do it. It is often not possible to help defend against attacks before they arrive, so in absence of prevention, we compensate with an overabundance of cure. Every time a player tries to pick on a newbie in Toothless and either verbally or by action disregards our warning response, it tells us our deterrent needs to be stronger--fairness isn't even in the equation.
3) We do have a very low opinion of players who build a model for growth and profit off the subjugating and farming of defenseless players, whether it be protection rackets, looting, straight up suppression attacks, or something else entirely. Luckily, the game itself isn't terribly conducive to such, but there always are those theoretical routes and people who test it out. Unless we have a meaningful connection to the victims (and a NAP generally does not suffice), we don't get involved as per my first point. But that doesn't mean we won't publicly speak out, offer advice and point victims toward other factions that may help, and generally promote by political means a viewpoint that shares our disdain for such tactics and carries predilection to stamping them out.
4) We personally have only seen a very few instances of true bullying in this game. Most of the time--as details flesh out--the issue turns out to be something else entirely, with the greatest offense on any side being small jabs and hot-headed escalation beyond necessity. For people who are likely to get involved in these matters, I highly recommend asking around and waiting at least 2-3 days for expanded intel before starting anything beyond conversations. This goes doubly so if the alleged victim is a member of your own alliance, unless you want to turn a petty squabble into an alliance-wide war and possibly drag your alliance's reputation through the mud.
|
 |