Badlands as an Arena for War |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
Ptolemy
Wordsmith Joined: 02 Nov 2015 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
That is a good thing?
|
|
asr
Wordsmith Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Alliances are formed to crush and take over other alliances.
Defeated leftovers will move to distant lands forming new alliances recruiting fresh blood whatever they can, as time goes by different classes between players are forming, tensions will grow between them, greedy and stronger becoming their new kings banishing out those who they don't like, like it were done before to themselves. Garbage recycling process. |
|
Shûl-nak
Wordsmith Warpainter Joined: 23 Dec 2014 Status: Offline Points: 197 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
One man's trash is another man's treasure.
|
|
Ptolemy
Wordsmith Joined: 02 Nov 2015 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Call your granddad, forget how the rest go's. Anyway, asr, LC's have yet to do that. Also, this is happening in BL, not Elgea. It's time to shake things up. |
|
asr
Wordsmith Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
land claiming is giving you only a common problem for many other players so you make sure that when you go attack someone you are not alone, you have larger changes to have comrades.
Talk that In Elgea somehow are less aggressive or warminded players is a tease. A small tickle.
|
|
Ptolemy
Wordsmith Joined: 02 Nov 2015 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 133 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I didn't say Elgean's are less aggressive. All I said as BL is in't Elgea. I was saying that it doesn't have to follow the same standards and rules that elgea has.
|
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
As I have pointed out ad nauseam in other posts, using many actual events that really happened, Elgea doesn't follow the imaginary rules and standards that people fantasize it does.
|
|
ajqtrz
Postmaster Joined: 24 May 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
First of all, the idea of having a war zone would be nice if it were to
have been set up at the beginning and everybody who moved into said
zone would have agreed. But having any group of players decide to make
any area of Illy a war zone over the objections of those who are there
and those who are not, is imposing your style of play on already
established players. I don't mind at all if you warriors wish to
declare any and/or all parts of Illy a war zone so long as you leave me
and those like me out of your games and let me play mine. The amount of
resources you might lose is so small as to be of no significant
consequence.
I've kept repeating the idea that you could just do two things and have all the PVP fun you want. 1) Drop the intimidation by threats of coercion you put upon the entire membership (and organize whatever PVP fights you want, complete with whatever intimidation by threats of coercion you choose to use on each other) ... in other words, retract your threats issued to all players and replace them with a DOH (Declaration of Homeland); and 2) stop trying to BL into a restricted war zone where any non-warriors are considered second-class. It is the height of hubris to declare that you are the ones who have the right to make the game into what you wish it to be when all the declarations and intimidation is not necessary to accomplish the goals of area domination and extreme PVP you say you want. I have a suggestion. If you wish to play PVP I'll organize a PVP tournament with a negotiated set of rules of participation among those who wish to participate. And those who do not wish to do so can be left alone. A couple of things about the attacks on others. Just because somebody disagrees with you does not make them a "hater." Such a claim is just one of the many methods used to circumvent discussion....it's name calling and if it were me calling a group of people "haters" I have a lot more armies at my doorstep. One wonders why one side can make mistakes and sound arrogant and condescending and get attacked, but the other can actually call people "haters" and nobody says a thing? Just wondering. And if really wanted to get out of your comfort zone, how about adopting my recommendations? If, as you imply, I'm afraid to get out of my comfort zone and should be willing to do so, isn't it a bit strange to then say that you are making a land claim so that you can reserve land? What's the point of reserving land unless you are just trying to avoid fighting for it later on? In my opinion there is something illogical about saying you want more PVP and then doing everything you can to set yourselves up to avoid PVP. One would think, since fighting is your comfort zone, you'd not want a land claim. So how about dropping the land claim and showing us you can live dangerously like you are telling the rest of us we have to live? AJ |
|
ajqtrz
Postmaster Joined: 24 May 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
asr
I'm sure there are other reasons for forming alliances. I actually formed mine for discussion purposes. Again, it's a sandbox and just as players can choose to have non-warfare ways of playing, so to alliances can exist for any number of reasons, including avoiding war for that matter. AJ |
|
Solanar
Forum Warrior Joined: 11 Jan 2015 Status: Offline Points: 312 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
Consent to PVP is given by playing a game where consent is not a necessary prerequisite to PVP.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |