Attaching Skinners/Cotters to Armies |
Post Reply 
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
Hiei 
Wordsmith 
Joined: 28 Jul 2012 Status: Offline Points: 168 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 22 Jul 2014 at 18:45 |
|
bump
Edited by Hiei - 27 Jul 2014 at 01:10 |
|
 |
|
|
Arctic55
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 379 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jul 2014 at 03:35 |
|
I would like to go on record to say, I like this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
Glin
Wordsmith
Joined: 06 Apr 2014 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jul 2014 at 01:06 |
|
Very expensive, losing skinners.
|
|
|
|
|
Demonic Spoon
New Poster 
Joined: 12 Jun 2014 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jul 2014 at 07:31 |
1) I assumed that would just have to be a risk involved with attaching harvesters to a army. More convenient, but also somewhat riskier. 2) Solved easily enough by only being able to attach one type of harvester to the army at a time. |
|
|
|
|
Bukama
New Poster
Joined: 30 May 2014 Location: Holland Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 19:17 |
|
I see just two problems with this:
1) if you lose the battle or some of the critters live you lose your harvesters too. 2) you can only have one type of harvester at work on a square at a time |
|
|
|
|
dantem
Greenhorn 
Joined: 21 Apr 2014 Location: The Room Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Jul 2014 at 07:43 |
|
lol jcx...true, but if you are going to hunt npc's just for the animal parts, this is a brilliant idea....
|
|
|
I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.
|
|
|
|
|
jcx
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jul 2014 at 12:33 |
|
Lazy crafters..
 |
|
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
|
|
|
|
Sheza
Forum Warrior
Joined: 16 Oct 2012 Location: Kumala Status: Offline Points: 325 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Jul 2014 at 00:08 |
|
I like this too .
|
|
|
If Horses don't go to Heaven when they die. then I want to go where they go.
|
|
|
|
|
dantem
Greenhorn
Joined: 21 Apr 2014 Location: The Room Status: Offline Points: 85 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jul 2014 at 16:36 |
|
It is a decent idea, but some problems I see are
1. Players losing harvesters because they do not scout the enemy/ players forgetting they have harvesters in their army and sending it to a fight 2. Kills near other player cities will cause problems, especially with the widely accepted 5 sq harvest rule But apart from these I think your idea is very nice!
|
|
|
I believe that if life gives you lemons, you should make lemonade... And try to find somebody whose life has given them vodka, and have a party.
|
|
|
|
|
DaniSuper
New Poster
Joined: 15 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 30 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01 Jul 2014 at 16:09 |
|
I am greatly in favour of this suggestion. I cant sometimes login again to check if my army has hit and then send cotters/skinners to collect the valuable hides etc on the spot. I am sure there are few other players who face similar problem because of real life getting in the way, by allowing the option of attaching the skinners and cotters, It will make it much easier for us to get full benefit of the resources dropped on the spot.
 |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Bukama wrote: