Amnesty Offer to SHARK Players, January 29-31

I decided to delete my post. For purity of this thread and not interfering important matters.

Edited by asr - 29 Jan 2016 at 23:08

Forcing a move back to Elgea is an expensive surrender term, particularly for players who have many cities in the Broken Lands. However, I don't see any other terms that have been traditional in Illyriad wars, like losing 1-2 cities and paying large amounts of gold and advanced resources. So in most respects, these terms seem much more lenient to SHARK than the ones they themselves have imposed on others.

Both sides made it clear that this is a war to control a strategic region. I suppose this is one way to consolidate long term power in the central Broken Lands.

I'd like to see if there is something that I can do. I have a somewhat small alliance in High Hills. We do, at times, offer refuge for players whose alliances are engaged in wars that they do not wish to participate in, with some specific requirements of our own.

I would ask if SIN would be accepting of changing the requirement to move back to Elgea to moving to High Hills instead (which would still vacate the land claim area) conditioned to the member of SHARK accepting refugee status. That would be the only change we would ask (again just for those that would take refuge with Aldkeep.) of the terms of surrender.  Should SHARK players then accept Aldkeep's offer of refuge, we would have our own terms for accepting that refugee status within our ranks; those terms however, while in addition to those required by SIN for surrender, do not conflict in any way other than the specific placement of cities required to move.

On one side, I fail to see how terms can be much more stringent than those those, but I am sure I will find out after they have captured/raised all my towns in Newlands - can't see much point surrendering before then following that announcement :P

Edited by Fyzz - 29 Jan 2016 at 17:38