All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance

Time to try and put a stop to this myth.

A certain Vicx player had cities in Dark territory during the Coalition-Consone war. An agreement was struck with Vicx leadership that he remains out of the war but there was a miscommunication inside Vicx and the player himself was not notified of the deal. As a result he attacked Dark sieges on a Vic player. Thinking that he broke his promise Dark proceeded to siege or capture all his cities in Dark area. I believe that he Exodused one or two cities. Talks with Vicx leadership at the time did not reveal the mixup and the real facts were made known to us only months later after that war ended.

H? indeed approached Dark to say to ease up on him, but no one actually stopped us since at the time we were sure that he had went back on his word.

I honestly can't see any end to a conflict like this without some kind of mutual, bilateral agreement.  We don't have to call it surrender if you don't want to, but I doubt anyone is just going to head off and give their opponents their backs.  

Again, for the upteenth time, during the Consone War no one in Consone lost more than three cities TOTAL* (that total includes cities lost in the war and war reparations); in many cases, players were allowed to walk away from the war.    In this war, however, we have members/allies  that have lost all but two, one or all of their cities (I don't count the small replacement city put in goodness knows where).   Our enemies are not holding back and all the BS posted here doesn't change it,  I consider most of the posts made by our foes as attempts to twist the facts and paint themselves in a better light.   Check the stats, look at who has lost cities and how many.   Bottom line they want NC, Dlords and Harmless gone from this game.   They could care less if a player has health problems, is stationed away from home serving their country, etc.      To clarify, because I've heard it before they do not back off players....one alliance starts in on a player then backs off stating they don't believe in sieging players out of the game only to have another alliance pick up where they stopped to finish the job.     

Like it or not, warfare in Illy is changed forever, talk all you want, the precedent has been set and you cannot go back.        

*Except the player/players that someone in DARK decided they wanted gone and the Coalition stopped them

"Team A" have already suffered more losses in this last war then any members of the Consone war EVER did. All of them have lost more to this war than any peace terms ever could. I would like Team B to consider a few things... firstly, that the more you destroy, the less they can pay. And secondly, that many of Team A will choose to abandon rather than face total humiliation.

If you are so determined to gain something from the peace terms, you must recognise that atm leniency is your only possible option.