Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 10>
Author
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Deranzin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 19:03
Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


Unless you meant that you were selling troops ... but that expands a bit the concept of this game's trading, wouldn't you say .?. LOL

Yes, It certainly does and that was exactly our intent - and it was FUN!  we knew NOTHING about war in here...


/facepalm you were selling troops, but knew nothing of war ... riiiiight ... why do I even bother .?. Tongue

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:



You are ignorant of the facts, Warren Gabriel attacked every newb near him and NC did as well after the NC-Bane war started.  I have our city charts and their IGM's begging for help - Sir Bradley & I will be going over those soon.


I am unaware of many facts and so are you, just like everyone ... our difference is that I know that I do not have every information that there is around while you pretend to know everything, even what I have in MY inbox ... 

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


I kept my account from becoming rubble by not getting over-zelous about my position and took surrender - you are free to do the same


if this is so then your cause is not about "reducing nastiness" but just being the ones dealing it and with unlimited capacity LOL

Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:

 

Well, you're calling it "different" information, but it's really just information that she has and you lack, so I'm comfortable call that usage correct.


And what about the information I have and she doesn't .?. Wink

she has some information, I have some other information to disprove her grandiose claims ... she claims that they protect small accounts, I have proof that they attacked them ... so I do not see where YOUR problem is ...

Branding people as ignorant for having different information, I'll say it again, is bad form ...

Originally posted by Halcyon Halcyon wrote:

 
So why is surrender just not possible?


Again with that question .?. This is getting boring ...






Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Angrim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:40
Originally posted by Arian Arian wrote:

Unilateral rules posted by Honoured Mule or Killer Poodle and not agreed to in advance by any other party are just propaganda.
it may be propaganda, but it is "just propaganda" only if the rules are not followed. if they are, then they are also rules of engagement. anything posted that favours one's own side can be called propaganda...that does not in itself rule out some other significance.

Originally posted by Arian Arian wrote:

some were threatened with losing everything - so I'm not sure what the difference is between then and now that everyone keeps alluding to.
i also remember this comment, from KP if memory serves. (i am not sure i see much difference between then and now, which is troubling in its own right.)

Originally posted by Arian Arian wrote:

No amount of spin will change things - if a player or an alliance surrenders no more cities will be lost
this would seem to be simply untrue if it's intended as a statement about "business as usual" in illy wars. many players have lost cities to surrender, some more than they have lost to war. is this intended as an offer specific to John Louis? is Team B requiring only exodus and not razings as a matter of policy? (and if so, would stating that be "just propaganda"?  Wink )

edited to fix my confusion between Team A and Team B. can we use Edward and Jacob next time?


Edited by Angrim - 02 Mar 2014 at 22:10
Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Halcyon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:34
Originally posted by John Louis John Louis wrote:


@ Halcyon – nothing prevents me from personally surrendering, except my values...
It is clear, however, that surrender is just not possible, it is not even clear at this point what surrender would mean. Team B already has its pound of flesh, if you take any more there really will be nothing left of Team A.

Team A's no surrender mentality is what places it in the dire situation of losing many more towns.

What makes Team A so special that they must be accomodated with something other than surrender?
Are you more righteous than us? - no.
Are you more honorable? - no.
So why is surrender just not possible?

What is it that Team A can't afford to pay for peace?
Cities? - almost none or no cities at all were taken from players who surrendered in this war.
Advanced resources? - I believe you have hundreds of thousands to spare.
Gold? - I believe you have billions.

All previous wars have ended with surrender or death. The choice remains yours.


Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar
Player Council - Ambassador

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aurordan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:28
Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:


Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:



Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

 
Also, calling people ignorant just because they happen to have some different facts from you, is a bit of a bad form imho ... 



HAHAHAHAHAHA

But that's the exact definition off...

Oh nevermind. 


Funny indeed ... because:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ignorant

because ignorance is LACK of knowledge on an issue and definitely not when you have DIFFERENT knowledge on that issue ... so you are actually laughing while being mistaken ... LOL


Well, you're calling it "different" information, but it's really just information that she has and you lack, so I'm comfortable call that usage correct.
Back to Top
Jenin View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jenin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:26
Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


I was ordered to attack a player and after I realized how small he was & that he was part of my neighbor Praetor Augustus' alliance, I asked to be excluded from TO action.  


So .?. Do your actions reflect your whole side .?. 

By that measure I broke the truce with my vCrow neighbor over this exact matter (him attacking small accounts) ... so should I then claim that everyone from my side had the same ideas like you do .?. I think that such an idea does not hold water ...

Plus, you said that you were ordered to attack a small player and asked to be excluded from it ... I find this honorable for you, but doesn't this imply that someone else carried on with those orders .?. Wink

Deranzin, after I noticed the above, I wrote to leadership and made it clear that we did not need to go that low, that attacks be between similarly sized players and also that we would somehow need to make peace one day...I am not sure quite how any of this has applied lately because I have ben a bit out of the loop since the winter started with a great deal of work and RL family drama.  I only know what I see and report it...

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


we also have a 3 city player called Aramis under attack right now by H? player(s?), so Idk to whom you are referring with regards to "high moral ground" - perhaps you might ASK what is going on so that the smell of blood doesn't turn us all into sharks...after all speech is a human gift, one i think we should not waste...try for facts, please - we don't need to inflame things with conjecture, ok?


Maybe, but I didn't claim that no small account was ever attacked by my side because I do not know that for a fact. 

You, however, did falsely proclaim that. Wink 

There is nothing false about the charts of cities my players had a month after the NC-Bane war started and the IGM's I have expressing their worries about time constraints in real life and the degrees of being attacked by NC players.  Since this is NOT a false accusation & Sir Bradley has expressed denial, he and I are now going over these events - I do not believe that you have enough inside knowledge to refute my accusation, so I think perhaps it's time you drop the indignation over  the fact that NC did INDEED attack newbs and also had NS involved in the million troops pile up as illustrated here:  
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/awesome-war-happening-where-to-get-infor_topic5132_page2.html
Myr's commanders & troops are clearly visible, she was the leader of a training alliance at the time and it gave a lot of us grave misgivings about the blurring between support and direct participation between parent and training alliance.

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


Yes we have been now, so please don't be snarky over this


BANE was, and still is iirc, this game's only military force for hire ... since when they are traders I know not, but your own alliance profile page says : 

"Current status:  Hired, under contract."   

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


then sandbagged when we had sold 75+% of our troops


Unless you meant that you were selling troops ... but that expands a bit the concept of this game's trading, wouldn't you say .?. LOL

Yes, It certainly does and that was exactly our intent - and it was FUN!  we knew NOTHING about war in here...

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


Deranzin, pray tell me why you are making such a connection about 'facts' such as that...this is NOT even about H?, it's about NC and anyone foolish enough to think that the nasty tactics some (not all) of their players got up to that was spoiling the fun of this game - that's all, plain & simple, please stop assuming you know what's going on here when clearly you don't.  and if you are going to make such a claim, show me proof at least... instead of the snarky little laughing face...


If you are not aware of the pre-war Hathaldir's post calling for revenge and having gathered many people with him for it, then this is not my fault. 

Apart from that, if it was "about NC" I would like your explanation why NC are amongst the last people standing and others (even in map positions unrelated to NC) where attacked first and foremost, like TVM for example. 

Also, calling people ignorant just because they happen to have some different facts from you, is a bit of a bad form imho ... Tongue

You are ignorant of the facts, Warren Gabriel attacked every newb near him and NC did as well after the NC-Bane war started.  I have our city charts and their IGM's begging for help - Sir Bradley & I will be going over those soon.

Originally posted by Jenin Jenin wrote:


I do hope you come to recognize that this whole war is about supporting nastiness which we think needs to be stopped and that it got ignored until it built up to unacceptable levels...


So, you went to stop the "nastiness" by taking it to new unprecedented levels .?.   LOL

I'll keep that in mind while my account is reduced to rubble Big smile (I am not being ironic, I really find that comment amusing) 

I kept my account from becoming rubble by not getting over-zelous about my position and took surrender - you are free to do the same
Back to Top
Mahaut View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Location: North West UK
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mahaut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:21
John Louis My problems in repetitive allusion to a real life war situation stem from the Consone war when players allied to H? started using terms like War Criminal and calling people Nazi's and in one somewhat disreputable case calling a member of Consone leadership by the same name as a Nazi war criminal. 
I find this sort of thing extremely distasteful and there is no reason to do it whatsoever. This IS a war game on a computer if people don't want to lose pixel cities then they shouldn't go to war or should leave their alliance. 
This is not real life.
Back to Top
Arian View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 11 Nov 2011
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 139
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Arian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:11
Starry is missing the point.

Unilateral rules posted by Honoured Mule or Killer Poodle and not agreed to in advance by any other party are just propaganda.

People fighting H? and allies in the Consone war didn't lose more than 3 cities because they either moved out of harms way, left their alliance and sought individual surrender terms or the entire alliance SURRENDERED before it got to that point, not because of any perceived sense of fairness or otherwise on the part of H? and friends - and some were threatened with losing everything - so I'm not sure what the difference is between then and now that everyone keeps alluding to.

It's all very simple and straightforward.

Nothing in Illy warfare has changed in any way.
You fight until one side surrenders at which point reparations are made and it all stops till the next war.

No amount of spin will change things - if a player or an alliance surrenders no more cities will be lost so it's entirely THEIR choice - by not doing so they are actually forcing things to continue the way they are. 
'Do you want ice with that?'
Back to Top
John Louis View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 99
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John Louis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 18:11
I am very grateful to all the helpful comments here, I can see some players are genuinely considering where we go from here.

With respect, I would like to discuss the following points:

@ Halcyon – nothing prevents me from personally surrendering, except my values. I am exploring the remote possibility that both Team A and B may want an end to this war. Given that Team A has already lost more than that the losers from past wars – what does Team B hope to gain other than the personal satisfaction of making past enemies surrender to them. In my view, this is pure revenge (plain and simple). So I suggest, put personal vendettas to one side and negotiate a real peace that will satisfy everybody – this is within sight, the moment is here, both sides just need to take a leap of faith and grab that opportunity before it is gone. It is clear, however, that surrender is just not possible, it is not even clear at this point what surrender would mean. Team B already has its pound of flesh, if you take any more there really will be nothing left of Team A (and most say that they do not want an Illy without Team A – so ball is in Team B's court). Poetically speaking, I now quote Lauren Hill, "What you want might make you cry, but what you need might pass you by, if you don't catch it...". The time for real peace is upon us, don't let it pass us by!

@ Jenin – thank you for your comments, however, I cannot agree with your assertions. Some may think that I am just spewing rhetoric, but I am trying to be genuine. I have been in NC many years, I have never seen them bully anybody...unless you include harassing bullies themselves. NC does harass bullies such as alliances/individuals trying to force Newbs to do as they say. Jenin, you compare NC to Black, but have you seen your own alliance's page? BANE is a mercenary alliance, you are currently under contract, its here for all to see: http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/#/Alliance/Alliance/760 . In Latin we say res ipsa loquitur (not the Illy alliance, I should point out, but the words mean "the thing speaks for itself"). Perhaps you need to start with the man (or woman) looking back at you in the mirror before making these types of accusations against NC. But, irrespective of points of view, I do hope we can work with one another at finding a true and lasting peace, that is what this post is about after all – are you prepared to discuss that without flinging ideological arguments about and making a huge mess in the process?

@ Mahaut & Rill – Rill, maybe I am mistaken but I thought I saw a post of yours (now deleted methinks) arguing like Mahaut that my words regarding a scorched earth policy were ridiculous and even hurtful. Rill, if I am mistaken I apologize and then this reply is only meant for Mahaut. Please do not take what I say personally, however, this game is a community (perhaps like the International Community in real life) and there is a war element, especially at this moment in time. Accordingly, analogies to real life war situations are only natural and appropriate. If you have been traumatized as a result of real life experiences, or wars going on in real life that you see in the news, maybe you need to take a step back. I have friends who have experienced real life wars and they are nowhere near as sensitive as some people who make accusatory posts in Illy. This is a game, and words are just words (most of the time). It makes for interesting reading, however, so long as people are not hypersensitive all of the time.

@ Spheniscidae – This war need not drag on unless and until one side surrenders – Ceasefire is a perfectly reasonable alternative. It opens the way for discussions in good faith and may bring about a more lasting peace than a much resented surrender (this resented surrender has happened before, which is why we are where we are now). Also, I will write whatever I feel I should write, you are not my editor or censor so don't read what I have to say if it upsets you so very much.

@ Elmindra – wow, you must be one of the few who actually admit your participation in this war is about vengeance. Thank you for your honesty, I guess, though you say nothing which is conducive towards a peace settlement.

Finally, I think I should reiterate – Team B has criticized the peace terms prepared by Team A in past wars. If they genuinely believe this was so bad, why are they following the example of Team A. The world is in your hands, you think you can create a better Illy – well, show us the way. Lead by example instead of following what Team A has done in the past. You certainly have the capacity to take the lead/initiative from here on. Prove Team A wrong, show them you can be trusted, that you do want peace – that there can be a better Illyriad. If Team B can usher in a Golden Age for Illyriad through a peace written in good faith and good acts instead of the blood of Team A, now is the time to do it...I dare you!
Back to Top
Elmindra View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Elmindra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 17:59
Originally posted by Starry Starry wrote:

 
Edit:  Elmindra, your post is filled with so many falsehoods, I'm not going to bother replying but I challenge you to post verifiable examples of H threatening any player with additional loss of cities once peace was secured.

I never said you threatened these things once peace was secured, I stated you and your lot threatened these things and did in fact act on it when you could BEFORE peace was secured by us accepting a surrender.

I have IGM's from leadership of TCol and BSH at the time stating as much, as well as from H? leadership and also from your so called embassy (outside forum) which you force all enemies to come and grovel to in order to accept surrender terms.  I will not post any of this because it is against Illy terms of use to do such things.

Originally posted by Starry Starry wrote:

No, I do not think our enemies will allow H to rebuild, in spite of their claims.

As for that, if it were up to me you are correct.  But, decisions such as this are not up to me.


Edited by Elmindra - 02 Mar 2014 at 18:01
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Deranzin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Mar 2014 at 17:43
Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:


Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

 
Also, calling people ignorant just because they happen to have some different facts from you, is a bit of a bad form imho ... 


HAHAHAHAHAHA

But that's the exact definition off...

Oh nevermind. 


Funny indeed ... because:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ignorant

because ignorance is LACK of knowledge on an issue and definitely not when you have DIFFERENT knowledge on that issue ... so you are actually laughing while being mistaken ... LOL



Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 10>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.