Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 8910
Author
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Halcyon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 18:43
Why is the light at the end of the tunnel never a peace train and always a siege train? Ouch
Back to Top
Jenin View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Status: Offline
Points: 16
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jenin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 18:34
My Dear John Lewis,

Team B's objective is not as you would think.  While I am not a genuine representative, I know the spirit of our push for war.  I think I can safely say that it is over the rough edge that caused Luna to shut down your previous thread.  It has pervaded GC and caused me to report several people for lewd and bigoted comments in the months previous to this war...there has been a lot of assumptions made by both sides which have been quite unfair; as there has not been any seriously direct communication (mostly baiting).  

There is the whole concept ushered in by Black and continued by NC; of stealing from non-allied newbs to support huge armies; pushing them to move without telling them how to make the best possible use of their city/game & threatening them, attacking them, etc.  Then as the lines blurred between newbs and 5+ city players, it became obvious that the nastiness of other on-line games had followed those of us who truly admire what H? had done prior to their support of NC.  Given as NC players are skilled warriors who in my opinion took far too much advantage of the newbs around them as evidenced by the strings of complaints about players such as Warren Gabriel and others, and then attacked BANE unmercifully while we were admittedly green horn traders who thought it might be cool to sell T2 Rez w troops attached (after seriously sandbagging II and several smaller alliances as well), it became obvious that no one would be enjoying the game much longer if we did not do a better than "the Consone".  

Both H & Consone supported the 10 square rule and the latter it seems to me was set up mostly to give a balance of power and did little to help deal with the frustrations of newer players who were frustrated by the overcrowding created by the 10 square rule.  It is my belief that this is and should be the ultimate subject of our current struggles.  

If is seems that "Team B" is going tit-for-tat with a scorched earth policy, I apologize; however since H? stubbornly refuses to admit that supporting NC when other alliances had expressed misgivings for the very reasons I state above; I am not sure there is any other way to make the point:  Bullying MUST stop...Illy is not a place where defense is easy, so attacking must have more social deliberation attached.  So please, Mr John Lewis, do not generalize about "Team B" motivations...let's have serious communication here, not just a bully pulpit, OK?
Back to Top
Halcyon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Halcyon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 18:16
I will go with JL's terms for both sides:
To my knowledge past wars - which had been won by Team A - have always ended with surrender and payment of reparations by the losing side. What has changed and why should this war end differently? Just because Team A is too proud?
Past wars did not end until one side surrendered and that side continued to be attacked and lose cities until they surrendered - what is different this time?
I submit that the claim that Team B is after revenge can't be truely tested with Team A stating that they will continue to fight and not surrender. If Team A offers to surrender and is rejected by Team B it may show that Team B is actually after wanton distruction and revenge.
Leaders of Team A stated in other threads that they do not trust the leaders of Team B and I believe that this goes both ways. How do we bridge this lack of trust?
Finally, what prevents JL, the writer of this thread, from surrendering in order to end his part in the war?


Edited by Halcyon - 01 Mar 2014 at 18:31
Back to Top
John Louis View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 99
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John Louis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 Mar 2014 at 17:59
All I Am Saying Is Give Peace A Chance (by John Louis)

I should, of course, start by highlighting that this post is entirely my own and is not endorsed by anybody (except me, I suppose).

Can there be peace in Illy? Should there be peace in Illy? Will this war ever end? Is surrender the only viable option?...Can we refrain from name-calling and insulting one another? My post on a A Short Treatise on the History of Illyriad was locked by GM Luna because you guys just could not control yourselves...

...if you are going to comment on my comments then please try to behave!! The accusations (and counter accusations, etc) are flying all over the place, is it even possible for the average Joe to make heads or tails of anything on these forums anymore?

I will try to start simply – can there be peace?

Firstly, we need to ascertain exactly what is necessary for there to be a viable peace.

Players need to stop destroying one another is the easy answer, but how can the Illy community bring this about?

For ease of reference I will try to simplify matters by referring to the two sides as follows: Harmless? and their allies ("Team A") and vCrow and their allies ("Team B") – this is an oversimplification, I know, but otherwise it becomes too confusing naming and referring to all the different alliances which are (or have been) involved.

My understanding of Team B's position is that their main objective was to stop Team A from, allegedly, dominating the server and imposing its 'will' on others (even if some Illy players thought that Team A's actions were for the ultimate good of everybody).

Has this not now been achieved? It is humbly submitted that any fair-minded observer would have to conclude that this objective has already been achieved.

The facts are that Team A is no longer the No. 1 alliance and Team B has successfully claimed the top 2 spots for themselves. What this means is that Team A can no longer command the authority it once did and therefore their much-criticized alleged 'policing' of Illyriad has come to an end. The balance of power has, in my view, definitively shifted and this is already apparent.

So, if the primary objective has been achieved, why has this war not come to an end?

Well, Team B may argue that this is because Team A will not surrender and they feel that it must as a prerequisite to any future peace.

In my opinion this is stubbornness and not at all how others have been treated in earlier wars. Sure, it is true that Team A has required surrender and war reparations from alliances it has defeated in the past, however, this was limited. Team B is presently carrying out a server-wide extermination of those who will not surrender to them. It is a scorched earth policy tantamount to genocide (if this was a real life war that is).

Team A may have done many things (good in some peoples eyes and bad in others), but it is not guilty of mass exterminations as we are seeing today being carried out by Team B.

The balance of power has shifted in Illy, Team A is not what it once was. The geopolitical landscape in Illyriad has morphed into something completely different. For better or worse, this is what we have now and for the foreseeable future.

Many players have voiced the opinion (and I agree) that Illyriad would be a poorer place without the members making up Team A. Yet their destruction is the only remaining objective for Team B – and this can only be called revenge.

So, where do we go from here?

The fact is that Team A will not surrender to Team B. Yet, Team B says it is willing to discuss the surrender of Team A and would like to do so as soon as possible to bring an end to this war.

It is submitted, therefore, that there are very few options left available – but there still are options. (1) A declaration of an end to this war (as the objectives have been achieved), or (2) a ceasefire with good faith from both sides and genuine negotiations at a permanent resolution.

I feel a ceasefire is the best way forward from here as this will allow much needed cooling time and an opportunity for everyone to take a step back and consider where we already are and where we are going as a community (I think certain alliances need to do a little soul-searching as well). I feel it is probably the only viable way for Illyriad to retain the rich tapestry of active players that it has created over the past few years. It will give Team B an opportunity to realize that the war need not go on, their ultimate goal has been reached – or do they hunger for genocide and are happy to justify trying to achieve this by saying Team A could have avoided it through surrender?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 8910
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.