| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Rill 
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
 Posted: 12 Aug 2012 at 20:58 |
he's a troll in duck's clothing, Bonfyr.
|
 |
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857
|
Posted: 12 Aug 2012 at 20:27 |
 Moby Duck wrote:
...reason enough for TLR to release the war hound's against them without fear of retribution from other alliance's. |
Riiiight. In what Illyrian universe could that happen?
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
|
Moby Duck
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 14:10 |
|
No SugarFree I've plenty, I'm just curious as to why TRO have'nt followed the TOS. That's reason enough for TLR to release the war hound's against them without fear of retribution from other alliance's.
|
|
Quack Quack
|
|
SugarFree
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 350
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 13:08 |
|
o shees, you really want that medal so badly? maybe ill buy one for both of us, would that be fine?
|
|
Moby Duck
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 26
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 11:52 |
|
Why are the Term's of Surrender not being met tho? TRO agreed to them so the war would end, seem's to me TRO got off lightly for a war they started but could'nt finish.
|
|
Quack Quack
|
|
Garth
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 May 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 249
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 06:23 |
Myr wrote:
Actually Garth, that was agreed upon language that referred solely to the terms. Not the breaking of those terms. |
I think we're talking about two different things. I'm fine to drop it and move on.
|
|
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 05:13 |
Rill wrote:
Right, we should stop bringing up that TLR broke the TOS. They don't like it when we do. |
Just stop, time to move one, enough already.
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 00:57 |
|
Right, we should stop bringing up that TLR broke the TOS. They don't like it when we do.
|
|
Myr
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 May 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 437
|
Posted: 11 Aug 2012 at 00:28 |
|
Actually Garth, that was agreed upon language that referred solely to the terms. Not the breaking of those terms.
|
|
Garth
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 May 2012
Location: Somewhere, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 249
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2012 at 09:48 |
Myr:
abstractdream wrote:
Eternal Fire> ... TLR also acknowledges that the Terms of Surrender set forth to end the conflict between TLR and TRO may in fact have been burdensome, i.e., transfer of medals or city size and placement limits. However, while TLR acknowledges the terms asked for may have been harsh and difficult to implement, our position is that the terms, having been agreed upon by the alliances directly involved in the conflict, are in fact binding...
|
That looks like Eternal Fire bringing up the TOS with TRO to me. A response addressing the breaking of the TOS on TLR's part is completely appropriate, though not necessarily germane to this particular thread.
|
|
Tweet
Aesir Apology to TLR
