Actions against Myll of [Wave]

Commanders please refrain from calling each other Hitler/Nazis/ whatever. I will warn this time, but if it pops up again I will get rid of the post and possibly quiet the person.

@Deranzin:     And surprisingly enough this little action has almost as many posts as the H? Peace Terms post for a war that has been going on for Months.  I guess people are just bored.

Deranzin wrote: Wow this topic is so much "fun" ... ...So, what exactly IS the whole debate about .?.

@iwannaplay

Whether the 10 square rule should be reexamined is a valid question.   I personally think it makes much sense.  Not all players are going to sov areas that are just the closest around them.  Many will pick and choose areas based on things like production bonuses or as in the case of [Fairy] and others like [Roads], for road templates.  Many times, the terrain immediately around a city may not be ideal for sov'ing.  

I have not found the 10 square rule to be an impediment to playing, even before BL opened up and doubled the map.  I enjoy scouring the map and finding those gems of spots for myself and my alliance members.   To have someone go and plop down in the middle of it is distressing to say the least.  I put MANY hours into looking for good Exodus, Tenaril and Siege locations for our players.

As for the Newbie ring, that is an exception that is built into the game.  It is a spawn area and has different rules.  That is why many players work hard to pick spots in areas like The Wastes.  To get out of the congestion.  It is like saving up to move from the city to a nice spot in the country. We've had the BL expansion and if the devs feel that population density warrants it, I'm sure other continents will follow.

iwannaplay wrote: Illy is getting too crowded to maintain the 10 square convention anymore and the game itself doesnt even abide by it.  Look at the newb ring.... there aren't any cities that are 10 squares from another.

Illy is getting too crowded to maintain the 10 square convention anymore and the game itself doesnt even abide by it.  Look at the newb ring.... there aren't any cities that are 10 squares from another.

Wow this topic is so much "fun" ...

On the one hand we have one alliance who has blatantly claimed that they will not respect a common convention held by many alliances (and it is written in there in many cases) and they will stand up to their own way of playing.

On the other hand we have an alliance which has publicly set for itself a rule which it upholds and it claims that they will enforce it on their own "claimed" lands. The rule is not unheard of and quite common and so, after the rule being broken they tried diplomacy and failed and now they announce that what they are going to actually go after the real perpetrator of the action, the alliance leader and none other.

Both sides have a reasonable argument, both are respectable viewpoints and both have the right to play the game as they like. So, what exactly IS the whole debate about .?.