Actions against Myll of [Wave]

@Steven:

We were told by members in [Wave] that is no longer the case and that he is still in charge.

@abstractdream

I'm sure there never was a global meeting.  This is more like common-law.  The concept pre-dates either of us, and has been upheld by most alliances playing the game for a very long time.

Glin wrote: A global decision was made. It should be honored.

Not true. I do not remember any "global" meeting since I've been here and there is no record of such a meeting from before my time in Illyriad. Some alliances claim 10, others do not (I've seen one or two claim more). It's their policy. There is no consensus. There are alliances that want to use this policy and enforce it on others and there are alliances that disagree. Plain and simple.

The consensus is 10 squares.  And from what I understand, that has to do with exodusing rules  and such and has been a long held convention.   What people dont seem to be seeing here is that the talking started a long time ago,   when the first violations started,  with Sov issues etc.   This did not just happen overnight, or without warning.  
This thread was made to let others in Illyria know why all the attacks on Myll,  (they will come up in Global Chat) and to let them know this is not a departure from FAIRY's stances,  but a well advertised and thought out execution of the alliances long time policy of protecting their own.   So to say the thread was not needed,  is an injustice to the community knows all ,  and can be akin to some of the thinking that kept the Western Hemisphere out of both WWs for so long and possibly led to some of the agressor's in those conflicts  boldness.   Not to try to paste any participants in Illyria as any real life counterparts,  just I believe this was a good way to pre-empt some of the naysayers and problems that could have arose if ConFeds and Alliance members were to just blindly follow agreements. 
As for the Declare War issue,  yes it is semantic,   whether it is War on Myll or a "Police Action"  semantic to some.  But an important semantic in terms of what it takes to end the conflict.  


The above is purely my take on what is going down and in no way is meant to reflect the official stance of any party involved.

Honestly, this is something you should have just done and kept out of the forums. It's a personal dispute between two alliances and because war isn't being declared, there is no need to draw attention to it. This kind of stuff happens all the time, people simply don't make threads about it because it doesn't concern anyone else.  Nothing good will come from this thread.