Actions against Myll of [Wave] |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 11> |
| Author | ||
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 11:48 |
|
|
Godwin's Law is strong in this one.
|
||
![]() |
||
Cancarix
New Poster
Joined: 10 Jul 2014 Location: Victoria Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 10:40 |
|
|
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out--
Because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me. Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps. If this game allows this type of behavior of the great partnerships with small, is not interesting playing here. That happened in real life a long time and gives bears repeating in a game. Where should new players stay?, in concentration camps?, reservations?. If the veteran players of good will do nothing, this game will die and will deserve to die. |
||
![]() |
||
Kurgar
New Poster
Joined: 18 May 2014 Status: Offline Points: 23 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 09:41 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
bansisdead
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 07:56 |
|
So are you solely targeting Myll or not? You seem to be saying two different things. |
||
![]() |
||
Steven Quincy Urpel
Wordsmith
Joined: 06 May 2014 Location: OUTER (SPACE) Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 07:22 |
|
|
WAVE does not appear to have any veteran accounts other than Myll's, so you might wanna reconsider your options if you wipe out his cities and nothing comes of it. Just my two cents.
|
||
|
They call me MISTER Urp!
|
||
![]() |
||
TanyaFairy
New Poster
Joined: 16 May 2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 06:29 |
|
|
Hi Everyone
no, the alliance has been told that if they still refuse to move the city or even negotiate about it we will next target Myll's alt. After that we will target the next alliance leader....whoever that may be. Tanya
|
||
![]() |
||
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 06:17 |
|
so if Myll is actually playing, one might hope that he will take notice and make some response. if he is not, Fairy might raze everything he has and still have no remedy to the offence... |
||
![]() |
||
RorschachRev
New Poster
Joined: 22 May 2012 Location: at home Status: Offline Points: 2 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 05:34 |
|
|
What's to discuss? penalize the offending player and if his alliance wants to alter his behavior as a means of protecting him from his consequences then by all means, discuss it between alliances. Raze away - but be willing to allow the player to move his city as he should have in the first place. Lesson learned, on with life.
|
||
![]() |
||
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 05:11 |
|
|
Your stance here seems to be drifting more and more toward you not liking what was written on their alliance profile. I'm just not convinced that's a valid reason to siege people.
This would, I'm pretty sure, have made it into public debate anyway, when the siege notifications came up, if nothing else.
|
||
![]() |
||
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Jul 2014 at 03:21 |
|
|
I don't really understand the logic of this argument. At first you condemned WAVE's actions for being outside the community accepted norms of Illyriad. Then, when people were critical of your raze intentions (which are also outside community accepted norms), you justify them by speculating about the meaning of statements on WAVE's alliance profile. If the entire cornerstone of your justification is the violation of community consensus, then violating community consensus seems like an awfully strange way to proceed.
I have no particular objection to you flattening this dude. I object to the elaborate dog-and-pony shows that seem to be part of Illyriad warfare. Brids is right, this should have been done quietly and without forum posts. I've rarely seen anything positive come from PR-style statements on the forums. |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 45678 11> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |