Account Sitters |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
| Author | |
Morgweneth
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Feb 2014 at 23:09 |
|
I am in complete agreement with Angrim, the current situation is not fair nor does if feel to be fair by the majority of Players I have spoken to, plus as the devs get no revenue from it I can only imagine they must like the game looking bigger. It is rare these days that someone cannot gain internet access or have the time just to log in now and then and where there are exceptional circumstances the Devs can be advised. The idea of a sat account to my way of thinking is putting something in trust and the sitter should be running a friends account to protect and develop it, not suiciding all it's troops or plundering its revenue, but a % could be available as a way of thanks. We are supposed to be limited to 2 accounts but currently because of the long term sitting rules this is not always the case, of course there are other ways people can try to get round this but they are separate issues and indeed such transgressions are not what this thread is about. In short it is not fair nor does it feel to be fair, and that to me matters a lot, and it is all easily fixable.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 Feb 2014 at 23:24 |
|
The developers don't seem to think the fix is so easy. I think Stormcrow made reference to a desire to fix it in his most recent global chat appearance. (I was not there, only have a partial transcript.) It seems that they are finding it more difficult to do than we imagine.
|
|
![]() |
|
Morgweneth
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2014 at 07:38 |
|
Well thanks for that, but no idea why it should prove so dificult compared to other aspects of the game, actually it would be nice to have some input/coment from the devs here so we have something more definitive
|
|
![]() |
|
Morgweneth
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 10:39 |
|
Well I did ask for a comment or some response from the Devs on this one, but nothing so far. I like many others think its an important issue that's detracting from the game, so some response would be appretiated.
|
|
![]() |
|
Miklabjarnir
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 73 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 17:32 |
Since the devs have already commented several times before on this topic, I do not think it is fair of you to expect them to comment on another person clobbering the dead horse. I think the limit on sitting is too high for a normal person to handle, and I would never try to sit more than two accounts - and not for more than a few weeks. People are different, however, and somebody who do not have other obligations (or even opportunities) might be playing Illyriad full-time. The only reason I see for the limitation on the number of accounts you can have is to prevent professional goldminers and account brokers from ruining the game like we have seen in other online games. When I signed up, the wording about the alt account was that you could have one if it was used for valid and interesting gameplay. Even your alt cannot "legally" be used as a pure resource feeder to your main. The problem with some accounts getting "unlimited" gold to build and keep oversize armies should be solved in another way. It is ridiculous that you can raise armies larger than your population and have them eat gold. Fixing this would be a big job for the devs, so I do not see it happening soon - but it needs to be done.
|
|
![]() |
|
Morgweneth
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Feb 2014 at 23:10 |
|
I personally have not seen a comment in the forums by the Devs on this issue, though it may be there nor do I consider this important issue to be a dead horse.
Edited by Morgweneth - 23 Feb 2014 at 23:10 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |