Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Account Sitters
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Account Sitters

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
Myr View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 26 May 2011
Location: Orlando, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 437
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Myr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Dec 2013 at 03:13
If you can't start production ques or troop ques you take away a couple of reasons that people ask for a sitter while they're away. A sitter sometimes has to move resources around between cities to keep things from de-leveling which can't be done if a sitter can't ship things. I think limiting sitter actions further is a bad idea. 


Back to Top
Alcie View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 308
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Alcie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Dec 2013 at 02:05
As far as I understand, the purpose of account sitting is mainly for people who know (or sometimes don't know--e.g. some extended emergency) that they will be gone for an extended period of time not to be deleted or sieged for inactivity.

I think that is a good purpose and I have used it myself. Maybe put a time limit on it--1 year or 6 months perhaps. I know from experience that if it was less than 6 months it would mess up a lot of people, it really is possible not to have the ability to log on for half a year. If the real person does log on, the time limit could reset.


Besides cities never going away and clogging up the map, the main problem is people using accounts sittees for themselves. This could be mostly solved if account sitters had less powers. Right now account sitters can:

1. start new production queues
2. build new troops
3. settle new towns
4. send out caravans full of gold to themselves...


None of these things are needed if you are just trying to keep an account un-deleted and un-sieged while someone is gone for 6 months. I can understand reading emails to make sure there are no problems, perhaps having a building queue in the towns that do exist to make them look semi active. But if most other abilities such as the 4 above were not allowed to sitters, there would be not be many ways open to abuse.
A line has to be drawn obviously, but right now sitters are allowed to do almost everything including settling new towns, which seems rediculous to me.

More restricted sitter abilities would presumably be open to some abuse still, but combining it with a long but not-forever time limit such as 6 months would solve every problem I can think of.
Back to Top
Darkwords View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Darkwords Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2013 at 19:49
I agree in a way and I am a perma sitter, the issue is that some long term players here have professions that mean they sometimes have to stay long term in places with little or no internet connection, but really I think a month or 2 of an actual player not logging in is probably enough to have the account closed.
Back to Top
arnesson View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 69
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote arnesson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02 Dec 2013 at 19:40
I agree.  Even that is too long really!  But perma-sitting MUST be eliminated!
Back to Top
ES2 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ES2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Nov 2013 at 07:42
Originally posted by Arctic55 Arctic55 wrote:

I am hearing more and more about the problem of perma sitting. So I have a solution. Note: This solution is not gurantied to fix 100% of the perma sitting problems.

I think that if the account you are sitting is not logged into by the owner in 31 days, your sitting ability is removed and the 90 day countdown is started for that account. Therefore, after 121 days, including the sitting days, the account is deleted like normal unless they meet the normal restrictions and exceptions.

Please comment below what you think about why or why not this should be implemented.

I would rather have something like this implemented than to carry on with the current sitting options. The ability to permanently sit an account is a bypass from the multiple account rule, and is unfair to players that do not sit other accounts.
Eternal Fire
Back to Top
Arctic55 View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 379
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Arctic55 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 Nov 2013 at 06:36
I am hearing more and more about the problem of perma sitting. So I have a solution. Note: This solution is not gurantied to fix 100% of the perma sitting problems.

I think that if the account you are sitting is not logged into by the owner in 31 days, your sitting ability is removed and the 90 day countdown is started for that account. Therefore, after 121 days, including the sitting days, the account is deleted like normal unless they meet the normal restrictions and exceptions.

Please comment below what you think about why or why not this should be implemented.

Edited by Arctic55 - 27 Nov 2013 at 06:52
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.