|
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
| Author | ||
Yso Sris
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 Location: Arkansas Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Topic: ABSOLUTELY FRIKKING AWESOME IDEAPosted: 23 Sep 2011 at 18:50 |
|
|
It would take some brainstorming, dev man hours and development, but allow up to 4 ajoined cities(in any layout to allow for features such as coastal where a square may not be possible) to become one megatropolis with shared resources, seperate research adding to the whole in some areas ( like 4 cities worth of caravans if researched in each segment), and one castle and wall but bonus multipliers on top of resource required for construction multipliers on single buildings, but all other buildings and resource plots meshed together in a new city graphic,. Of course each segment counting against total limit.
Some things would have to be figured out like research, libraries and mage towers and spell effects representing the sum of 4 cities or just having 1 available for each segment and allowing effects to accumulate (like 4 marketplaces allowing 4 caravan researches separately but a sum total of caravans available for the city as a whole) And for example if each city has5-7 food plots it would add up to say, 20-28 total food plots, also I'd cripple the que a little, like a 4 city megatropolis would not result in a 8 building quee but like 4 total. Edited by Yso Sris - 23 Sep 2011 at 18:57 |
||
![]() |
||
Yso Sris
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 Location: Arkansas Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 19:08 |
|
|
Ive been stumping my idea in GC and I don't think anyone has the brainpower to 'get it'. The basic idea is along the same lines as neighboring cities IRL being absorbed and 1 disencorporated when they grow against each other.
|
||
![]() |
||
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010 Location: uk Status: Offline Points: 1191 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 19:10 |
|
|
I don't 'get it'. Must be my 'brainpower' running flat again. :/
|
||
![]() |
||
Ander
Postmaster General
Joined: 24 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1269 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 19:10 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
GFactor
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jul 2011 Location: Tennessee, USA Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 19:30 |
|
|
Something tells me it's not brainpower that's the problem. You're proposing a very large, very influential, and very difficult addition to the game that would likely take the better part of a year (optimistically) to implement. At first glance, a feature like this -- and I almost want to call it an "expansion," because it's that big -- seems like it would make the game much more difficult to play from a thought perspective. Trying not to speak for everyone else, I know I don't like games I can't easily understand.
As an aside -- I'm going to posit that your idea got a lackluster reception in GC for a combination of several reasons: a) People were probably busy chatting about something else; b) GC is a relaxed atmosphere so people didn't *want* to think too hard about it; c) Your history on the forums suggests you may not have been very amicable in your approach to others, thus causing the "pitch" to fail. |
||
![]() |
||
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 1483 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 20:13 |
|
Your time in Illyriad will be short then... |
||
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
ezri
New Poster
Joined: 06 Sep 2011 Status: Offline Points: 9 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 20:25 |
|
|
I like the idea of having several cities together making one bigger city. It's what would happen in real life. I don't like his idea of walls suddenly having multiplied defence. If you make stone wall around village, or same stone wall around city, it's still same stone wall, I'd say even more easilly breakable since there will be probably less people on perimeter...
Disadvantages with such a thing... as system is now, linking 4 cities into one big, might mean that you could build only one thing at a time, not four. You probably wouldn't be allowed to have 4 barracks either (or any other similar building 4 times, unless they would change it, so slower development on the city... advantage would be that such city could grow into enormous size and that it could have possibly all possible buildings in one place...
|
||
![]() |
||
Kilotov of DokGthung
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 723 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 20:27 |
|
|
bull idea.
|
||
![]() |
||
GFactor
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jul 2011 Location: Tennessee, USA Status: Offline Points: 13 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 20:28 |
|
Well played, sir. ... So you're saying I *should* to try to speak for everyone else here, then?
|
||
![]() |
||
Yso Sris
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Aug 2011 Location: Arkansas Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Posted: 23 Sep 2011 at 23:08 |
|
|
So GFactor my lack of patience with whiners invalidates my awesome ideas? And I am always amicable, as much as I can be while being right at the same time. It's a delicate balance.
I'm not saying it's not a -very- involved idea from start to deployment, with some very complicated issues to sort out and it would be an 'expansion' worthy implementation but still it's an awesome idea to be on the radar screen. |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page 123> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |