Agreement between SkB, Absa and RHY is one way how disputes can be resolved:
Rare
Mine or Resource Allocation
3a Ownership is automatic if within three squares of a city or
nearest existing city if that is closer than three squares. A city settled with
permission will be considered existing.
3b A sovereignty claim will be
considered ownership provided it is not made within three squares of an
existing city. A prior sovereignty claim will take precedence over 3c.
3c New cities establish
ownership five days after notifying the party who currently claims ownership.
Any occupying armies of the previous owner shall be withdrawn within those five
days.
3d No new cities to be settled
closer than seven squares of an existing city.
3e For other squares ownership
shall be on the basis of occupying armies.
3f Were by merit of occupation,
proximity or any other factor that the alliances consider open to
interpretation a resource location is in dispute and two players have a claim that 3a to e does
not resolve the player
gathering will provide 30% of the resource gathered to the other player.
3g The player who holds
ownership for a location may provide permission for another player to harvest
that location. Once given permission will require renewal every six months the
share of resources shall be as 3f above.
3h Resource locations belonging to
inactive cities (defined as no player growth in 21 days) will be considered
available for claim under rules 3a to e. If the inactive city concerned comes
under new ownership it is to be considered settled with permission.