Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A statement from the Dwarven Lords...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedA statement from the Dwarven Lords...
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 20>
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
PirateKing View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2011
Location: ~South Seas~
Status: Offline
Points: 225 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 17:59
Let us put this in simpler terms. 



Edit:  The "Do Not Settle" arrows continue into infinity.  I just didn't want to make a 2k X 2k map.


Edited by PirateKing - 23 May 2012 at 19:23
Aarrr! Thar be no better friend than making friends with a pirate!
~SouthSeasPirates~
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: Oarnamly
Status: Offline
Points: 1857 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 17:25
You can say that, if you like but these posts represent a small vocal minority. 
Bonfyr Verboo
Back to Top
Quackers View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2011
Location: Jeff City
Status: Offline
Points: 435 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 17:04
Originally posted by Berylla Berylla wrote:

Mostly my reply as well :)


Well at least now you can point to this and say.. see a majority of the Illy community agrees with us. :)
Back to Top
Berylla View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2011
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 121 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 14:21
Mostly my reply as well :)
Back to Top
Subatoi View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 380 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 14:10
No I understood why you guys in Dlords published this notification but my comment you quoted there was directed at those that turned this from 1 page to 13, debating over settlement and sov rights and claims etc. 
Back to Top
Berylla View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2011
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 121 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 14:08
Originally posted by Subatoi Subatoi wrote:

I'd hate to ask this, but hasn't this been deeply debated before this topic? I think the end answer is always "ask those that issued the claim", "there's another city within my claim *grumble*  I'll cope.." or "if you feel you have a claim and the other side doesn't see it, remove the other city".

No matter how you debate it you will come to these three options, so aren't we all just wasting time ?
By publicly stating how we stand in the matter, we can always refer to this thread when there is a diplomatic issue regarding city-placements.
Back to Top
Subatoi View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 380 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 13:40
I'd hate to ask this, but hasn't this been deeply debated before this topic? I think the end answer is always "ask those that issued the claim", "there's another city within my claim *grumble*  I'll cope.." or "if you feel you have a claim and the other side doesn't see it, remove the other city".

No matter how you debate it you will come to these three options, so aren't we all just wasting time ?
Back to Top
dunnoob View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Location: Elijal
Status: Offline
Points: 800 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 11:17
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Would it not be easier to simply say "Don't claim sov that is within 5 squares of a player whose city was there first"?
If I'm in the newer town I'd wonder why the older town doesn't claim sov before me, but...
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Plus 5 is a smaller number, so at first glace it doesn't look as bad.
...yes, it sounds friendlier than a general 10sq "rule", and it covers one example given by HM.   
Back to Top
Llyorn Of Jaensch View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 08:55
I do so love semantics.
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 May 2012 at 08:06
Originally posted by dunnoob dunnoob wrote:

Well, that cannot work for two towns with a distance less than 10, where the overlapping radius 5 circles contain an economically interesting square.

Ok,

*Would it not be easier to simply say "Don't claim sov that is within 5 squares of a player whose city was there first"? 

So the overlap wont matter because he gets the squares anyway. Which would probably discourage people moving that close to people more than the 10 square thing, because it;s then even more apparent that you're limiting your growth. Plus 5 is a smaller number, so at first glace it doesn't look as bad. =P
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 20>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.