| Author |
|
Elmindra 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 464
|
 Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 22:55 |
Hmm, so A.A. fights BSH, BSH fights A.A.
A.A. surrenders to A.A. and submits to their terms, but must also submit to H?
Also determined is that DLords and RES now speak for H? as well on all matters?
Regardless it doesn't really matter I suppose. Very epic rundown and much entertainment to be had. In the end it is just a game and everything should be in as good spirit as this.
Edited by Elmindra - 03 Jan 2013 at 22:59
|
 |
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 22:44 |
 Elmindra wrote:
Explain why A.A. needs approval from H? in order to surrender from BSH? Is BSH not an alliance that can handle their own business then Belargyle? It seems to me that the only armies that clashed were that of A.A. and BSH and they handled their hostilities as needed. |
H? is also at war with AA. So just ending war with BSH does not end the war with H?.
|
|
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 464
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 22:42 |
|
Explain why A.A. needs approval from H? in order to surrender from BSH? Is BSH not an alliance that can handle their own business then Belargyle? It seems to me that the only armies that clashed were that of A.A. and BSH and they handled their hostilities as needed.
|
|
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 22:07 |
Kabu wrote:
It's great to see that kind of thread from the losing side. Finally an alliance that seems to enjoy the game no matter what happens! |
I totally agree with that as well ... great story :)
|
|
Hadus
Postmaster
Joined: 28 Jun 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 545
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 20:41 |
Kabu wrote:
It's great to see that kind of thread from the losing side. Finally an alliance that seems to enjoy the game no matter what happens! |
This, precisely!
|
|
|
|
belargyle
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 401
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 19:48 |
|
I believe KP but any in H leadership will get it to where it needs to go
|
|
ias
New Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2012
Location: VENEZUELA
Status: Offline
Points: 2
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 19:02 |
|
excellent writing and excelent attitude
|
|
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 18:17 |
belargyle wrote:
Well played sir Geofrey.
However, I would like to remind you that exiting the war and what that entails, must go through H?
I am heartened to see you desire to step out with honor, but it still must go through proper channels.
We can state a pause of actions against your alliance while this is established, thus honoring our allies agreement with you as you finalize it with H? They are the designated arbiters in this for 'The Coalition'.
|
Ofcourse. I have already contacted H? previously and am currently awaiting their reply. Is there a specific Coalition arbiter I should forward my correspondence to?
|
|
|
|
Raatalagk
Wordsmith
Joined: 13 Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 154
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 17:53 |
Great story, Geofrey!
I hope that one day, when I lose a city, I can handle it with the same good grace.
|
|
belargyle
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Jun 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 401
|
Posted: 03 Jan 2013 at 17:29 |
Well played sir Geofrey.
However, I would like to remind you that exiting the war and what that entails, must go through H?
I am heartened to see you desire to step out with honor, but it still must go through proper channels.
We can state a pause of actions against your alliance while this is established, thus honoring our allies agreement with you as you finalize it with H? They are the designated arbiters in this for 'The Coalition'.
|
|
Tweet
A.A. & BSH Conflict
Topic Options
