5 on 5 war

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   Hello everyone, I was just wondering if there would be any interest in setting up a friendly 5 on 5 war. The rules would be simple, no thieves, but spies and assassins would be just fine :), sieges are only wall breakers, once a city looses it's walls it is considered destroyed. Teams would be determined by who joined and we would pick 2 people as captains out of the 10 people and the 2 captains would choose their teams draft style. We could possibly go 10 vs 10 if their is enough interest, however, I think that would be the max, Also, we could do a buy in if people wished to, and the winners would split the winnings. But that is just floating an idea out their. Feel free to igm me or post on here your comments concerning this idea. 

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
demdigs Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Status: Offline Points: 570	Post Options Post Reply Quote demdigs Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Topic: 5 on 5 war Posted: 28 Oct 2015 at 18:52
	Hello everyone, I was just wondering if there would be any interest in setting up a friendly 5 on 5 war. The rules would be simple, no thieves, but spies and assassins would be just fine :), sieges are only wall breakers, once a city looses it's walls it is considered destroyed. Teams would be determined by who joined and we would pick 2 people as captains out of the 10 people and the 2 captains would choose their teams draft style. We could possibly go 10 vs 10 if their is enough interest, however, I think that would be the max, Also, we could do a buy in if people wished to, and the winners would split the winnings. But that is just floating an idea out their. Feel free to igm me or post on here your comments concerning this idea.

jcx Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281	Post Options Post Reply Quote jcx Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 03:59
	Oh. war of walls. sounds great! count me in!
	Disclaimer: The above is jcx\|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day. jcx in H? \| orcboy in H?

Mr Damage Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 598	Post Options Post Reply Quote Mr Damage Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 05:59
	Something to do, Grey is interested but no accounts will be leaving the alliance. If you think you can work around that drop me a line in game.

Alcie Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Status: Offline Points: 308	Post Options Post Reply Quote Alcie Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 13:25
	I am not sure who might be interested but I will ask around in alliance. Either way I would like to say that I really like the rules of engagement you've set out. Its a good alternative to 'king of the hill style' to allow sorta-sieging. An alliance versus alliance tourney with similar rules might be quite fun as well. For this one, ideally people wouldn't have to leave alliances... I feel like that is always the biggest hurdle for these type of self-made tournaments and why they are relatively rare and hard to organize. Friends want to fight in fun tourneys but friends are usually NAP or confed or in the same alliance... I wish there was a setting you (or probably your alliance leader) could set for particular members and particular NAPs to allow those members marked with the setting to beat on each other without changing global diplomacy. If it worked 'within' an alliance that would be extra fun!

demdigs Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Status: Offline Points: 570	Post Options Post Reply Quote demdigs Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 16:53
	I was figuring 1 alliance vs another, this way it would be easier for players to coordinate their activities and no one outside of the fighters would mistake a siege as the real thing and have real wars start over this battle. That is why i proposed it the way i did.

Captain Kindly Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 19 Aug 2011 Location: Fremorn Status: Offline Points: 276	Post Options Post Reply Quote Captain Kindly Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 29 Oct 2015 at 22:46
	You could contact ubluntu. He's using selection through player-generated API-keys to distinguish which players are in which alliance in the Crows' Hunting Tournament. Maybe his findings can be of use here.


demdigs Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Status: Offline Points: 570	Post Options Post Reply Quote demdigs Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 30 Oct 2015 at 03:42
	I'd prefer to let him focus on that tourny right now. after words sure.

Sasuke Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List New Poster Joined: 21 Sep 2015 Status: Offline Points: 3	Post Options Post Reply Quote Sasuke Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 03 Nov 2015 at 10:51
	Sounds Fun , I am in too , Demdigs In-game name : Sasuke

Lifeless Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List New Poster Joined: 15 Sep 2015 Location: Wind Status: Offline Points: 38	Post Options Post Reply Quote Lifeless Report Post Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 07 Nov 2015 at 19:44
	Sounds interesting enough
	The Undead God, Lifeless