|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 9> |
| Author | ||
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 496 |
Posted: 05 Dec 2011 at 21:06 |
|
|
Thank you! This way should not be any problem.
And by the way, is not a random newbie popping near me the problem, I could even adopt him/her, but looking the ring and thinking my nearby could became that way..... wow, do you feel me ? ;-) |
||
![]() |
||
Faldrin
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Status: Offline Points: 239 |
Posted: 05 Dec 2011 at 21:09 |
|
Because the upkeep cost of the building is WAY to high considering the discount you get on the sovereignty cost. Up the discount to at least the double and lower the upkeep cost of the Estate. Edit: We have debated this before in this thread: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/07oct11-release-patchnotes_topic2569_post30355.html?KW=#30355 Edited by Faldrin - 05 Dec 2011 at 21:16 |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 821 |
Posted: 05 Dec 2011 at 21:43 |
|
Not completely agreeing with Faldrin on this, tho I must agree that the resource I run out of mainly is research points, which are finite (in the sense that you cant improve upon them beyond the lvl 20 library and the Allembine research discovery), and the sovereignty tiles really deplete the rp production rapidly - far quicker than making it able to properly take Chancery of estates into a practical balanced use. That is my experience anyway, other may differ. |
||
![]() |
||
Sloter
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Aug 2011 Status: Offline Points: 304 |
Posted: 05 Dec 2011 at 22:05 |
|
|
It could be better i agree but when combined with two geomancers retreat it offers more room to manipulate res income.For exmpl geomancers can boost food income and sovs can boost res for geomancers retreat or other buildings with basic res upkeep.There are many options.I am glad they did not make it too easy to use or it would not be interesting :) It should definatly not be easy to keep high pop cities (over 25-26k pop).It is good that some aspects of game depend on creativity and imagination of players rather then cash and prestige.
|
||
![]() |
||
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Posted: 05 Dec 2011 at 23:31 |
|
|
One question for clarification: Does the negative resource rule affect any town of a player with 100 or more total population? Such as a player with a 1500 population town and a 500 population town who is now starting a third town? Even though the third town has less than 100 population, will it still be affected? Or does it not affect any town with under 100 population, regardless of the total population of the player?
In asking this question, I'm not expressing any opinion about how this should work, just asking how it does work. Thanks!
Edited by Rill - 06 Dec 2011 at 00:24 |
||
![]() |
||
Silent/Steadfast
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jun 2011 Location: Pacific County Status: Offline Points: 553 |
Posted: 06 Dec 2011 at 01:20 |
|
|
YEAH! At the newbie policy, NOOOO! At the negative resources.
|
||
|
"Semantics are no protection from a 50 Megaton Thermonuclear Stormcrow."-Yggdrassil (June 21, 2011 6:48 PM)
"SCROLL ya donut!" Urgorr The Old (September 1, 2011 4:08 PM) |
||
![]() |
||
Erik Dirk
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Posted: 06 Dec 2011 at 02:20 |
|
|
what happens if your last building was a farm, flourmill or the equivelent of negative res!!!
Are there going to be any changes to the population required for a new town? My biggest problem with this change has always been that those with 10 towns who used the "exploit" to get there have an unfair advantage I would really like to see all basic production, (and those associated with basic production) removed from this new rule. and secondly make basic resource consumption count towards population required for a new city |
||
![]() |
||
sofsirwj
New Poster
Joined: 13 Sep 2011 Location: China Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Posted: 06 Dec 2011 at 02:22 |
|
|
Wondering, if I spend much long time to destroy an inactive nearby player ago.
[ send thieves and cast blights(from the new rule of Negative Resources applied), set leveling barrack the top priority and do military research first, building siege army things and so on. ] then i find he's gone by this miracle... ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Erik Dirk
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 158 |
Posted: 06 Dec 2011 at 03:41 |
|
|
Oh also if I have say negative wood then would any sov building de-level first or could a T2 building be de-levelled if it was built more recently
|
||
![]() |
||
Daufer
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 332 |
Posted: 06 Dec 2011 at 04:44 |
|
Read carefully.
Please correct me if I'm wrong SC
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 9> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |