| Author |
|
Rorgash 
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
 Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 20:24 |
|
demdigs, if they didnt want to accept the terms they had all the right not to, and as such, you have no right to try and decide this :)
|
 |
Vanerin
Forum Warrior
Joined: 05 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 418
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 20:24 |
|
Dem, if this is what they agreed to, I don't think we should interfere. But I do agree on the dangers of prestige being involved in surrender terms. I think that in general it is a bad idea, should be avoided, and can not be forced on the surrendering party.
|
|
Torn Sky
Forum Warrior
Joined: 28 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 402
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 20:27 |
|
I do have to agree asking for real $$ in a surrender should not be started its a dangerous slope that imo could ruin the game.
|
|
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 20:29 |
asking for very high demands could potentionaly make them refuse the deal, and in so let the winners continue having fun and the losers getting their asses get kicked :)
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 20:36 |
 Torn Sky wrote:
I do have to agree asking for real $$ in a surrender should not be started its a dangerous slope that imo could ruin the game. |
I will be surprised if it becomes a trend.
|
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: TEXAS Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1865
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 21:30 |
Terms accepted, what's the problem? If you don't like the Prestige thing, don't do it.
Five players contribute 1 "free" Prestige point per day for six months for a total of (6X30X5=) 900. No dollars, pounds, sheckles or whatever. Plenty of Prestige to go around AND complete he terms.
I do not know where this "War" originated...bad manners, hurt feelings, I don't know but it was declared and engaged by one side before the other, a clear set of events.
The naysayers are expected and predictable. There is no circumstance in which an alliance that wishes to be taken seriously can "roll over" and expect to prosper. We defended ourselves first and then took the fight to the enemy. Show me an alliance that doesn't do that and I will show you a "dead" alliance.
|
|
Bonfyr Verboo
|
|
Thordor
Greenhorn
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 44
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 21:59 |
|
I think it's best to let this matter rest, if I wasn't ok with this I wouldn't have agreed, it's as simple as that, this is between T.R.O and TLR, and I'd very much like this whole situation to simply be put to rest. :)
|
|
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 22:01 |
|
/me gets a torch and soem dry wood, hoping to light a big fire somewhere..
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 22:04 |
|
Good to see peace I guess. Best of luck to TLR and TRO.
|
|
Thordor
Greenhorn
Joined: 14 Jul 2011
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 44
|
Posted: 18 Jul 2012 at 22:48 |
|
Many thanks, Aurordan, I'm looking forward to peacefully growing with my alliance from this point fourth, and we encourage all others to do the same. :)
|
|
Tweet
TRO accepts Terms of Surrender
Topic Options