Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Casus Belli
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedCasus Belli

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
MFrance View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 65
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Casus Belli
    Posted: 15 Apr 2010 at 18:26

Yep! And I think it is quite nice to have a land plenty of resources and no need for war. I wouldn't complain about that.

..MFrance
Back to Top
Fishymax View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Location: Ipswich
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 Apr 2010 at 17:11
I dont know about anyone else, but I feel pretty pleased to have found a game that is in its infancy.  If anything, the lack of endgame at the moment, and the fact that the developers are listening, and responding to the points brought up by the players, means that you get to have an impact on the next server.
 
I personally will be playing through this server and enjoying the experience.  Maybe even suggesting ideas that come to me as I play.  I think thats what this server seems to be about, and because of this, we will end up with a very playable next server.  (Which, by the way, we will all rock at!)
 
Cheers guys.  Expect me to be levelling up, and then trying to steal your stuff.  Not for any other reason than it will be a good laugh.
 
Chin chin poodles.
Back to Top
GM Stormcrow View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Location: Illyria
Status: Offline
Points: 3475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 01:31
Originally posted by Corual Corual wrote:

That would be absolutely amazing SC! That would add a whole new dynamic to the game. I think I would sqeeze a tear and feel a tingle in my pants!

In which case, it's gone from a "consideration" to a "definite" on the feature list.

A few fairly critical things to come first - but I'd ETA this in terms of weeks rather than months.
Back to Top
Corual View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2010
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Apr 2010 at 01:03
Originally posted by GM Stormcrow GM Stormcrow wrote:


and even:
"PLAYER GENERATED QUESTS / MERCENARY CONTRACTS
  • Yes. We are, really, really, really considering allowing players to set up their own quests, with specific objectives.  For example, Player X might set up a quest to "Attack Player Y", with a reward of Z gold for each unit killed, or "Sabotage Player Y's Research Queue". Think of it slightly like a "Mercenary" contract system with some "game-enforced" payment mechanism."
which is kind-of like "Player Created Victory Conditions for other Players to fulfill".

I hope that helps answer some of the questions put here.
 
 
That would be absolutely amazing SC! That would add a whole new dynamic to the game. I think I would sqeeze a tear and feel a tingle in my pants!
Back to Top
Diablito View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 17:45
Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

The game appears to have unlimited resources and land for expansion.  So what reason is there for war?
 
The essence of human social activity is competiton for scarce resources - food, wealth, sexual partners for DNA propogation.  Here, no scarcity exists (ignoring the sexual partners aspect :)).
 
So this is Utopia and there is no need for war to take what the other clan has.  What's left to fight about?  Body odor?  Bad teeth?  Bad manners?

Because you keep posting annoying crap on the forum.
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 16:08
When the time comes to produce an endgame scenario, I recommend option 3--specifically, a "king of the hill" or "unreal tournament, domination-style" method of declaring the victorious confederacy (taking place in a number of balanced, spread out locations that must all be held at once).  Then repeat to establish a victorious alliance...again for player.

To prevent stalemate, either disable the creation of new cities (last man standing element) or allow city settling without population requirements (unlimited escalation).  The former is probably better.

I know some in my alliance are very eager for updates to the quest system and find it one of the greatest appeals of this game.  It definitely does increase the breadth of the game and help some find purpose.
Back to Top
GM Stormcrow View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Location: Illyria
Status: Offline
Points: 3475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 15:54
A few pointers, though - some of which has already been covered.

Illyriad is a sandbox, and you can do what you like within the game mechanics and the rules.  Insofar as this is the case, your Victory Conditions are personal to you and only you can decide what they look like.  You might choose your personal victory conditions to "be the #1 trader in the game", "run the #1 ranked mercenary alliance in the game", "research everything there is to research", "have the most cities", "be the most aggressive forum poster (Parennis is storming into the lead on this one)", "find a way of Conquering King Sigurd's castle" - or whatever you choose to regard as a victory.

There aren't - currently - any "Forced Victory Conditions" in place in the game, ie Victory Conditions as chosen and implemented by the game design team.

However, we are considering having a conclusion to a server's runtime.  It was always our intention to do so, but we have many months ahead of us in which to plan what such a conclusion might look like, how long the "endgame" would last, and what the Victory Conditions for such a conclusion would be; as well as to decide when would be an appropriate time to implement such a set of victory conditions. 

Personally, I'm in favour of an escalating set of circumstances which ultimately lead to a "victory" or number of "victories" during the server endgame.  It should take time, organisation and effort to be ranked up there as a victor on a server, and it should be satisfying and rewarding to reach, rather than arbitrary - as many of these games are.

Along the way we will be introducing 'smaller' victories (akin to winning the battle rather than the war).  In the Current Dev List you will see items such as:
"MEDALS FOR PLAYERS

TROPHIES FOR ALLIANCES

STRATEGICALLY IMPORTANT WORLD MAP LOCATIONS"
and even:
"PLAYER GENERATED QUESTS / MERCENARY CONTRACTS
  • Yes. We are, really, really, really considering allowing players to set up their own quests, with specific objectives.  For example, Player X might set up a quest to "Attack Player Y", with a reward of Z gold for each unit killed, or "Sabotage Player Y's Research Queue". Think of it slightly like a "Mercenary" contract system with some "game-enforced" payment mechanism."
which is kind-of like "Player Created Victory Conditions for other Players to fulfill".

I hope that helps answer some of the questions put here.


Edited by GM Stormcrow - 13 Apr 2010 at 15:55
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 15:53
A bully is just a human with a neighbor.  Someone who whines about bullies is just someone who isn't stronger than his neighbor.  You say this game is just an outlet for bullies, and in a fashion you are correct.  Yet I suspect that you will enjoy this game very much.

Luckily there is another sinful outlet you have not addressed: the pride of life.  Some of us seek fame and fortune in ways that require a "pious" path...at least whilst under public scrutiny.  And, along with all the other elements of social balance and "self-righteous wrath" found in the real world, such forces will produce a social landscape very similar to that of the players that create it both here and in real life.


Edited by HonoredMule - 13 Apr 2010 at 15:56
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 15:46
Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

Originally posted by HonoredMule HonoredMule wrote:

Because you're afraid someone else will do it first.

We are mostly at peace right now, but in a game like this, such is indistinguishable from cold war.  As long as one player can hurt another, we will all stockpile armament, strive to outperform our neighbors in the tech race, and eye every movement on the map suspiciously.  That, or preach love and unicorns until we're the first to get steamrolled.

Either way, the outcome is inevitable.  Security only comes through military advantage, and that can be gained or lost by the acquisition of plunder.  Throw in a few who just like conflict for its own sake, and you have a conflagration that will ignite repeatedly for the foreseeable future.  This present calm is merely in anticipation of the first shot...an event prolonged only by the collective fear and uncertainty of a populace unwilling to risk the rebuttal of neighbors with untested capabilities.
 So I build an Army to defend myself from Seige and Bombardment from a player that is stuck in a 2 year old mindset of being compelled to take what I have because I have it?  The point of this is to defend against 2 year olds?Confused


You can deride the mentality all you want, but at the end of the day that "bully with a 2-year-old mentality" will still take your stuff.  And if you don't defend yourself, it'll be like taking candy from a baby.  After that, you may choose between quitting and playing Sim City (try not to whine about the natural disasters too much...they won't even consider reasoning with you) or spending some time in the real world.  Once there, rescind your national citizenship, pack your belongings, and move into international waters.  Then wait and see how long it takes before yet another "bully with a 2-year-old mentality" takes all your stuff again.

In 28 years I've not seen a shred of evidence dissuading me from believing mankind is at its roots purely evil.  Absent social, political/military, and spiritual influences, they will "take all your stuff" every time--and it will be for no more reason than that they can.  Call it childish, but it's not...it's human.  The only childish element is failing to recognize the consequences or what chance one has of attaining and retaining the benefit perceived in taking the evil road.  But what is also childish is building straw houses on the hurricane belt, for much the same reason.
Back to Top
The_Dude View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 Apr 2010 at 15:17
Like I said, this isn't a game as much as an outlet for bullies.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.