Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Siege and Capture or...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Siege and Capture or...
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Wartow View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2014
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 579 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wartow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Siege and Capture or...
    Posted: 17 Oct 2017 at 03:05
Hucbold, when he could focus beyond name calling, brought up an interesting idea.  Why is the requirement to raze the same as that to capture a city?  Should there even been a raze option?  If an enemy cannot capture then perhaps continued bombardment is necessary to reach a zero (or very low, let's say 7) population before the city is considered to be destroyed/razed.

Without considering the above change, what if a razed city was left in a state of ruins for a given period (7 days, 14, days, a full moon cycle) before a new city could be occupy the square.  Any pre-existing terraform would also reset.  

Lastly, we can currently produce two siege engines, one for walls and another for buildings, what about the use of siege blocks to create defensive artillery?  I guess that will be introduced along with naval vessels.

Enough innovation for today...
Back to Top
Corwin View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Location: Farshards
Status: Offline
Points: 294 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Corwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2017 at 07:40
Bringing city pop down to 1 or 10 or 100 is probably more cruel then razing. Once a town is razed the player can settle a new town that can grow a lot faster then a city on a location where it will continue to be a target.
Back to Top
Lord Stanley View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 33 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lord Stanley Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2017 at 14:37
I disagree with you Corwin. I would much rather have a city with 1pop and complete research than a city with 6k pop (after siege for example) with half done research.
It is a pain for an established player to rebuild a city but not nearly as much as starting from scratch.

Edited by Lord Stanley - 17 Oct 2017 at 14:38
//elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/b/309517/av.jpg
Back to Top
The Reaper View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Jun 2015
Location: Washington
Status: Offline
Points: 37 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Reaper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2017 at 14:50
DO NOT GET RID OF THE RAZE OPTION.
Back to Top
Corwin View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2011
Location: Farshards
Status: Offline
Points: 294 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Corwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2017 at 15:03
Originally posted by Lord Stanley Lord Stanley wrote:

I disagree with you Corwin. I would much rather have a city with 1pop and complete research than a city with 6k pop (after siege for example) with half done research.
It is a pain for an established player to rebuild a city but not nearly as much as starting from scratch.


That's not the options you get. It's a used up city slot or the chance to settle (or siege) a new town. The way it is now you can capture a new town after you lost one. What is proposed leaves you with a useless town that has all research done.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.