Print Page | Close Window

Epic battles

Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Tournament V - 2nd Anniversary
Forum Description: Forum for the ongoing alliance tournament
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=3208
Printed Date: 21 Oct 2018 at 01:13
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Epic battles
Posted By: Gossip Boy
Subject: Epic battles
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 12:57
I thought it would be wonderful to create something like an archive for this tourney by listing the battles with more than 50K casualty.It would be still better if the people involved shared their battle reports here.
i will start by reporting the first of these epic battles which have taken place today at 85|-22 in middle kingdom between xbloodxpoolx (attacker) of the Ccrow's and the Harmless(defender/s)

casualties:12875 for the attacking force
                 39372 for the defending force



Replies:
Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 13:04
The global market is booming!


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 13:05
here is the tournament report which xbloodxpoolx posted in the forum earlier

Sent By:System
Received By:You
Date:2/22/2012 10:18:25 AM
Two opposing forces clash against each other.

Cavalry comes into its own when able to strike hostile forces at will, and from unexpected directions - and nowhere is this more feasible than on open plains. Lightly armoured spear units, however, prefer terrain where there's some cover available.

Fighting defensively on open plains, cavalry draws strength from the ability to form and reform their lines of engagement depending on the direction of battle, and it is here where cavalry excels.

Attackers:Unit:Quantity:Casualties:Survivors:
Commander: LeviathanKnights Knight1Damaged for 67, 533 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights19151128756276
Commander: The Father Of LiesKnights Knight1Damaged for 67, 533 health remains.
Commander: The AntichristKnights Knight1Damaged for 67, 533 health remains.


Defenders:Unit:Quantity:Casualties:Survivors:
Commander: ValiantKnights Knight1Damaged for 400, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights197119710
Commander: Captain of Horse 53Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: Captain of Horse 52Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: Captain of Horse 47Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: Captain of Horse 47Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: Captain of Horse 49Knights Knight1Damaged for 100, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights200020000
Commander: Captain of Horse 49Knights Knight1Damaged for 100, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights200020000
Commander: Captain of Horse 54Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights9099090
Commander: Captain of Horse 55Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights9099090
Commander: Captain of Horse 25Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: Captain of Horse 25Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights181618160
Commander: DalthinorLongbowmen Longbowman1Damaged for 550, 0 health remains.
Troops:Longbowmen Longbowmen460746070
Commander: FaithfulLongbowmen Longbowman1Damaged for 550, 0 health remains.
Troops:Longbowmen Longbowmen754675460
Commander: Knight-2 C7Knights Knight1Damaged for 244, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight1-C5Knights Knight1Damaged for 194, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight-1Knights Knight1Damaged for 144, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight-1Knights Knight1Damaged for 246, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight-2Knights Knight1Damaged for 94, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight-1Knights Knight1Damaged for 244, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight2-C5Knights Knight1Damaged for 194, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: BigKnightKnights Knight1Damaged for 244, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: HugeKnightKnights Knight1Damaged for 294, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights8738730
Commander: Knight-2Knights Knight1Damaged for 279, 0 health remains.
Troops:Knights Knights6776770


Posted By: Captain Ganoes Paran
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 14:10
/me takes a mop to clear all the blood 



Posted By: Hybrid
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 14:13
Whew!!!! So much Bloodshed....< ="application/x-dap-" id="DAPPlugin" style="visibility: collapse">


Posted By: Nokigon
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 20:00
Foolish. I would never use cav to defend, especially cav as good as those ones


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 20:17
Largest  cavalry army i saw deployed so far....that is 50k troops we wont see on fields during tourney so all is good as far as i am concerned :) < id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 22 Feb 2012 at 23:13
He must be running negative taxes to achieve 20k T2 cavs...

-------------


Posted By: G0DsDestroyer
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2012 at 13:54
It's possible to have more than 20k cavalry without going negative Brids.
And to Bloodpool, YOU SUCK!!!!LOL
Ya should've waited until there were 70k troops there!


-------------
http://live.xbox.com/en-US/MyXbox/Profile?gamertag=G0DsDestroyer" rel="nofollow - Tia mi aven Moridin isainde vadin


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 23 Feb 2012 at 18:00
Originally posted by G0DsDestroyer G0DsDestroyer wrote:

It's possible to have more than 20k cavalry without going negative Brids.
And to Bloodpool, YOU SUCK!!!!LOL
Ya should've waited until there were 70k troops there!


bloodpool I will be very happy to provide you with the address of 70k troops square if you promise you will wipe them off Wink


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 17:10
so after a gap of nearly two days we had our second epic battle and the location this time was tallimar

Attacker: Mandarins31 Invictus losses 38436
Defender: Harmless                  losses  28542

total casualties 66978 >50000 (check)

Result: Epic battleLOL

Provide us with battle report guys and we offer you many such battles in returnWink

Fair trade,huh


Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 18:35
Its rude to brag.

-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 18:55
Report below as demanded.

As LoJ said, hard to brag here. Result being bit of unexpected. Must i say Bravo, certainly. But i have some questions, like: Erm guys, was really plains bonus applied? :p . I hardly see even 35 jungle bonus + 10% prestige + 15% coms + 20% plains bonus lets imagine, doing such a result, even on the 130k def units that were present (even assumming 1 of my knights worthed 1,5 def units Only).
(I personnaly had knight with 20% on Jungle (EDITED), prestige, 15% coms and plains bonus)

If that result was expected and on that measure though, i must say i big Bravo to the defenders for their impressive work.



Two opposing forces clash against each other.

Cavalry comes into its own when able to strike hostile forces at will, and from unexpected directions - and nowhere is this more feasible than on open plains. Lightly armoured spear units, however, prefer terrain where there's some cover available.

Fighting defensively on open plains, cavalry draws strength from the ability to form and reform their lines of engagement depending on the direction of battle, and it is here where cavalry excels.

Attackers: Unit: Quantity: Casualties: Survivors:
Commander: Supreme Commander Lincoln Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 450, 0 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 38436 38436 0


Despite your troops' defeat, word reaches you concerning the defenders' forces in this battle.

Defenders: Unit: Quantity: Casualties: Survivors:
Commander: Lothalian Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 478 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 8892 1995 6897
Commander: Pokey Halbardiers Halbardier 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Halbardiers Halbardiers 479 107 372
Troops: Crossbowmen Crossbowmen 1170 262 908
Commander: Haldrin Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 1640 368 1272
Commander: Pitcher Crossbowmen Crossbowman 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Crossbowmen Crossbowmen 2439 547 1892
Commander: Porcupine Crossbowmen Crossbowman 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Crossbowmen Crossbowmen 2647 593 2054
Commander: Pin Cushion Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 478 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 6690 1501 5189
Commander: Spitball Crossbowmen Crossbowman 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Crossbowmen Crossbowmen 2423 543 1880
Commander: Myrdrin Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 528 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 5028 1128 3900
Commander: Dalrith Marshals Marshal 1 Damaged for 22, 378 health remains.
Troops: Marshals Marshals 2758 618 2140
Commander: Lancelot Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Longbowmen Longbowmen 730 163 567
Commander: Sky Strike Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 378 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 8872 1990 6882
Commander: Distance Tickler Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 7755 1740 6015
Commander: Celedryn Marshals Marshal 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Marshals Marshals 3499 785 2714
Commander: Distance Poker Crossbowmen Crossbowman 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Crossbowmen Crossbowmen 2491 558 1933
Commander: Jeran Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 7618 1709 5909
Commander: Tehane Marshals Marshal 1 Damaged for 22, 478 health remains.
Troops: Marshals Marshals 3314 743 2571
Commander: Captain of Horse 34 Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 250 56 194
Commander: Pikester Pikemen Pikeman 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Men-at-Arms Men-at-Arms 968 217 751
Commander: Ethris Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 528 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 4869 1092 3777
Commander: SouthPaw Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 428 health remains.
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 1745 391 1354
Commander: McFee Protectors Protector 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 2425 544 1881
Commander: Steadfast Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 3580 803 2777
Commander: Jurah Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 228 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 2928 657 2271
Commander: redseal Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 146 health remains.
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 16 3 13
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 8 1 7
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 2439 547 1892
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 294 65 229
Troops: Marshals Marshals 50 11 39
Commander: Freccianera da Castro Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 495 111 384
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 495 111 384
Commander: GG Charioteer Com 1 Charioteers Charioteer 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 3998 897 3101
Troops: Charioteers Charioteers 769 172 597
Commander: Zampatriste da Castro Swiftsteeds Swiftsteed 1 Damaged for 22, 86 health remains.
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 2 0 2
Commander: Brigliadoro da Castro Marshals Marshal 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 265 59 206
Commander: Cavalcavia da Castro Marshals Marshal 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 435 97 338
Commander: Albert K Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 1032 231 801
Troops: Longbowmen Longbowmen 320 71 249
Troops: Pikemen Pikemen 200 44 156
Commander: Arcorto da Castro Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 433 97 336
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 10 2 8
Troops: Marshals Marshals 94 21 73
Commander: Eragon Swiftsteeds Swiftsteed 1 Damaged for 22, 328 health remains.
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 375 84 291
Troops: Marshals Marshals 389 87 302
Commander: Arya Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 278 health remains.
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 199 44 155
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 200 44 156
Commander: Saphira Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 328 health remains.
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 273 61 212
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 256 57 199
Commander: Katrina Phalanxes Phalanx 1 Damaged for 22, 278 health remains.
Troops: Wardens Wardens 254 56 198
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 238 53 185
Commander: Pyg Sentinels Sentinel 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Protectors Protectors 1 0 1
Troops: Phalanxes Phalanxes 6 1 5
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 5 1 4
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 1456 326 1130
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 100 22 78
Troops: Marshals Marshals 50 11 39
Commander: Sov I Wardancers Wardancer 1 Damaged for 22, 428 health remains.
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 1196 268 928
Commander: Farthir Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 4976 1116 3860
Commander: Eladril Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Protectors Protectors 1 0 1
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 99 22 77
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 1863 418 1445
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 30 6 24
Troops: Marshals Marshals 138 30 108
Commander: Zarrus Sentinels Sentinel 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 3 0 3
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 8 1 7
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 6951 1559 5392
Commander: Dudley Protectors Protector 1 Damaged for 22, 528 health remains.
Troops: Marshals Marshals 1350 302 1048
Commander: Super Boss Longbowmen Longbowman 1 Damaged for 22, 578 health remains.
Troops: Longbowmen Longbowmen 2383 534 1849
Commander: Knight King Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 1000 224 776
Commander: Knight-1 Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 228 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 979 219 760
Commander: MotherKnight Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 228 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 979 219 760
Commander: Eryn Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 178 health remains.
Troops: Marshals Marshals 50 11 39
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 442 99 343
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 199 44 155
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 979 219 760
Commander: Wart06VInfAttGD Stalwarts Stalwart 1 Damaged for 22, 228 health remains.
Troops: Axmen Axmen 1071 240 831
Commander: WeakKnight Knights Knight 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Knights Knights 1110 249 861
Commander: Genghis Khan Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshot 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Wardancers Wardancers 25 5 20
Troops: Sentinels Sentinels 187 41 146
Troops: Elven Trueshots Elven Trueshots 979 219 760
Commander: Swoofus Swiftsteeds Swiftsteed 1 Damaged for 22, 78 health remains.
Troops: Swiftsteeds Swiftsteeds 1 0 1


Posted By: Saladin The Zephyr
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:20
Ok maybe I'm wrong but I don't see how the numbers add up?


Posted By: Createure
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:26
Originally posted by Saladin The Zephyr Saladin The Zephyr wrote:

Ok maybe I'm wrong but I don't see how the numbers add up?


Addition: The combination of two or more things to achieve a greater value.

e.g. 1 + 1 = 2

Like that?


Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:29
Originally posted by Saladin The Zephyr Saladin The Zephyr wrote:

Ok maybe I'm wrong but I don't see how the numbers add up?

I added H? losses to 28542, it adds up. I think that's the first time I've seen such a disadvantage for the attacker. Nice to see you can have semi-realistic defenses after all...


-------------


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:42
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by Saladin The Zephyr Saladin The Zephyr wrote:

Ok maybe I'm wrong but I don't see how the numbers add up?

I added H? losses to 28542, it adds up. I think that's the first time I've seen such a disadvantage for the attacker. Nice to see you can have semi-realistic defenses after all...

I did provide the number when i mentioned the battle first......next time i will write the numbers in bold


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:45
Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:

Originally posted by Saladin The Zephyr Saladin The Zephyr wrote:

Ok maybe I'm wrong but I don't see how the numbers add up?


Addition: The combination of two or more things to achieve a greater value.

e.g. 1 + 1 = 2

Like that?


Have you ever considered taking up a teaching job,creature?
I bet my money on creature becoming an excellent teacherWink


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:47
I have seen my share of battles but i never saw 300% def bonus in battle.I have much more to learn about how military works in this game.< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 19:55
Maybe if i defended with treushots on mountain in a city with maxed walls, in jungle biome with 2 jungle biome buildings in my city, and with comms maxed out in personal def and divisional, and some prestige also....hmm that is some 200%, still not as good as H? do it on plains against boosted human cavalry...my head starts to hurt for trying to understand how they managed that.that is why they are top alliance i guess< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 20:46
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_gQOfF0Ymo

Wink


-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: Berde
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 20:56
By and by, I'm interested in that slaughter at Kem!


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 21:42
beriadanwen it will up to side that lost more troops to post report.It is only fair thing.

As for Talimar battle attacking cavalry had prestige bonus 10%, jungle bonus 20%, comm bonus 15 % and plains bonus 40% (probably) total 95% bonus,that means that each knight had some 120 attack points, on army of 38k that is some 4560000 attack points.To kill only 28k troops it would mean that defending troop had in average 160 def against cavalry.I just cant figure out how can that be gained considering that fielded troops have basic average deff of 25 (adding posible bonuses to that, jungle 35%-3 buildings, prestige 10%, comm 10%)On basic 25 def against cavalry that comes to only some 37-38 def against cavalry per unit, so where did aditional 120
 def per unit came?Not from formation.Not from coomanders (some did but nothing that could make this outcome)Troops numbers in your favor would not have such effect also, in best case they would modify to some 1-2% in your favor.It is a mystery to me.I saw many battles from early2010 to now but i never saw this percentage oscilation.For deff bonus against cavalry to rise from some 40 per unit within all posible bonuses existing, to 160 per unit.I was wrong, that is not 300% bonus but 500% bonus to basic 25 def on plains your archers had.Unless i am missing something obvious (very likely since i am not good with math), if i do i ask other exp vets to corect in my calculations on this thread.
< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Anjire
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 21:49
are you sure he had the jungle bonus? 


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 21:50
i will corect myself :), attacking cavalry had 85% bonus but that changes little since i calculated with less cavalry then it was in attack < id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 21:51
He did, one biome building, 20%.I am not sure what is bonus on plains but it is probably 40< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Createure
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:02
I find your posts hard to read Sloter. Sry. :/

What's with those weird jscode tags after all your messages?


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:05
No prob Creature.I dont know, they always apear, i wish i could get rid of those.< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Tordenkaffen
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:08
I see dead code Pinch


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:09
No other inputs except code comments?Cmon vets, lets see your analise of battle< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:20
Maybe my post was too confusing, i am sure that it was.Lets make it more simple.How come that defending 28k t2 bows kill 38k t2 attacking cavalry if both sides have same bonuses except aditional cavalry bonuses for plains for attacking cavalry.I think that even with all codes folowing my post this should be simple enough question?< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:22
Well, could someone in H? confirm if that was planned that way; if you expected my knights to have so few killing ratios on plains (under 1 def for 3/4 knights... never saw that ever).

So please, just confirm or not that's due to a tactic you developed and used there.

Otherwise, that would be good to rise up a petition to ask our mighty Devs to fix this potential bug on Tallimar ;)


Posted By: JimJams
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:40
Originally posted by Mandarins31 Mandarins31 wrote:

Well, could someone in H? confirm if that was planned that way; if you expected my knights to have so few killing ratios on plains (under 1 def for 3/4 knights... never saw that ever).

So please, just confirm or not that's due to a tactic you developed and used there.

Otherwise, that would be good to rise up a petition to ask our mighty Devs to fix this potential bug on Tallimar ;)

Tactic? Having more defense power than incoming attack power. It's an ancient tactic very appreciated :-)

About casualties, are you sure it's a bug? Please show me how many units we should had lost... and why. To simplify let assume we had more defense power than the attacker (we won so we should have more eh) and let say defense power:attack power ratio was 58:42

;-)




Posted By: Aurordan
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:52
It's my understanding that, while you would still have won having more power on the space, you should have lost more units, especially if he had the bonus that he did.  Though the stats of those commanders might confuse it somewhat.


Posted By: Starry
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:56
While I understand you are unhappy with the results Mandarin, we've done the math and there was no glitch.    We are not going to share any information about our boosts/bonus/Commanders during this tourney; I'm sure you understand why. 

:)


-------------
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule



Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:58
H? comms in this battle had at max power to kill some 1200 knights (60 comms, deff bonus 1500 tops, plus 55% bonuses max is some 2300 def per comm against cav per commander, total of 138000 def points against cav,divided by 110 attack from single knight, that is 1250 knights killed by H? comms)< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:59
I think they ate their spinach just like Popeye said...

-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 22:59
Thank you,that is fair Starry, that is all we wanted to hear.So it was tactics not bug.< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 23:04
I think the bug is in all these posts...  whats with that coding I see (0.o)

Originally posted by Sloter Sloter wrote:

< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Sloter
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 23:05
Not you too about coding, just pretend you did not seen it< id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 23:07
LoL

/me performs a Jedi mind trick on myself and everyone else...  "These aren't the codes you're looking for..."


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 24 Feb 2012 at 23:41
Thanks for clarification Starry. I sill dont get how you did, so a real bravo... you surly worked well your Maths :) . Im not really unhappy if it was in your plans... im more unhappy not to get how you did it.

About difference of size, it doesnt count. not counting bonus, 20 attacking units against 100 def ones makes def lose 20 units. 20 att against 2000 ones, makes def lose 20 units, as 20 is 1% of 2000 (though, for less well rounded numbers, i agree % can bring some favorable round up). There is no overpowering bonus as far as i know


Though, ill show what calculations i roughly did just to know if someone saws in that some obvious mistake:

I Had 38k knights. 65 Basic attack. 10% bonus by prestige, 20% cause in jungle, 15% by commanders, plus lets imagine 30% from plain cav terrain bonus. it make a 75% bonus. Then 38K time 65 = 2470k . 2470 times 1,75 (the bonus) = 4322,5k attack power

Roughly, defensive units on spot were 135k, and an average def of 40 against Cavalry let's say.
135K times 40 = 5400 def power against Cav.

% of casualies observed on the report are around 22,4%
It means that my full attack with all bonus aplied worthed 22,4% of the full present defence with all bonus applied.

So, My total attack power = 4322,5k and equals 22,4% of 19297k , this last number being total def power against cav, with all bonus applie

So basic def power was around 5400K, and was at around 19297k with all bonus applied.
19297/5400 = 3,57 ... meaning that the defense had  257% bonus on def against cav

Wile lets imagine, potential def bonus could have been at max 35% for jungle, 10% prestige, 15% commanders and lets say 20% from terrain... that make 80% bonus at max, far from 257%.

I didn count commanders heroism: there were some 50 commanders defending. If they were all trueshots, at lvl 10 self def against Cav, they would worth 50 times 61 = 3050 Trueshots. they have 25 basic def against cav. 3050 times 25 = 75,25k adding power, plus the 80% potential bonus on it... it doesnt make much difference.



So maybe am i doing a huge mistake in these calculations... but in any case, i still dont get your tactic ;)

So Bravos to the ones who developped it. The hard work is rewarded :)




Posted By: Silverlake
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 00:05
Originally posted by Sloter Sloter wrote:

... just pretend you did not seen it.... < id="gwProxy" ="">< jscode="leoInternalChangeDone" ="ifofjsCall==''jsCall;elsesetTimeout'jsCall',500;" id="jsProxy" ="">

That's what you do when your blind date has a big old herpes sore on the upper lip... but the code is more obvious LOL


Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 00:34
Personally, I'd send a petition regardless, since you never know if something is really working correctly unless you ask anyway but maybe that's just me. Worst they can do is say it worked the way it was suppose to. 

-------------


Posted By: Arthurian
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 01:13
You guys are forgetting the single most important part here.  This square is in my back yard, b***ches.  My town #winning is 22 squares away.  Don't mess with the tiger blood!  That's 100% bonus right there.


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 01:27
Originally posted by Arthurian Arthurian wrote:

You guys are forgetting the single most important part here.  This square is in my back yard, b***ches.  My town #winning is 22 squares away.  Don't mess with the tiger blood!  That's 100% bonus right there.
Arrogance breeds distraction and pride comes before the fall... 

/me turns to walk away but slips and falls due to a pool of tiger blood on the ground...  Hummm - perhaps that was a self fulfilling prophecy.  (0.o)


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: KillerPoodle
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 05:54
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Personally, I'd send a petition regardless, since you never know if something is really working correctly unless you ask anyway but maybe that's just me. Worst they can do is say it worked the way it was suppose to. 


I am 100% sure a petition went in within 1 hour of the event - regardless of what has been posted here.

I don't blame them for that - if it was me I would do the same.


-------------
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill


Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 12:10
You're right KillerPoodle, after some hesitations, we sent a petition some 3-4 hours after the event, to prevent there were potentially a glitch down there, that would have partiticipate on that result.


Posted By: Createure
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 14:14
I can understand the hesitation... you don't want to seem like you are crying it was a glitch just because you lost. Wink

But hey I guess it is in everyone's interests to be sure nothing is buggy.


Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 14:52
Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:

I don't see anyone in H? claiming there was a glitch when we lost to bloodpool heavily earlier... just my 2 cents.

someone would expect a 5-10% difference from the expected battle outcome based on the attack/defence ratio and consider that normal. But when there is a 50-100% difference, one would suspect a glitch or an incomplete battle report.

if bloodpool had attacked with 18,000 spearmen (instead of cavalry), and H had lost as heavily, people would have suspected a glitch. 

...just my 2 cents.




Posted By: Createure
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 15:53
Originally posted by Ander Ander wrote:

...someone would expect a 5-10% difference from the expected battle outcome...


Perhaps it is your expectations that are wrong, rather than the battle outcome.


Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 17:11
Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:


But hey I guess it is in everyone's interests to be sure nothing is buggy.


Better be careful... i remind some old (now unexisting) alliance which used propaganda a lot ;)


Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 17:15
Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:

Originally posted by Ander Ander wrote:

...someone would expect a 5-10% difference from the expected battle outcome...


Perhaps it is your expectations that are wrong, rather than the battle outcome.

Yes, and since nobody seem to be able to explain it, people suspect it to be a glitch. Maybe the battle report was truncated in the system mail, or there was an integer overflow Ermm




Posted By: Brids17
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 17:30
Does the jungle bonus stack? So if there's 6 peoples with 6 jungle type buildings that let's just say give 10% combat bonus in jungle, perhaps if they're all sitting on the same square it adds to a 60% bonus? I'm just throwing ideas out there, as I have no idea how they could have done so well...



-------------


Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 17:39
Originally posted by Mandarins31 Mandarins31 wrote:



Originally posted by Createure Createure wrote:


But hey I guess it is in everyone's interests to be sure nothing is buggy.


Better be careful... i remind some old (now unexisting) alliance which used propaganda a lot ;)



What is this veiled threat for?


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 17:52
I don't want this thread to be another Harmless v/s all battleground..lets get what we are here for......EPIC BATTLESSmile

I used some of my scouts and 've located some of the biggest armies occupying the squares as of now
REGION                 ALLIANCE               STRENGTH

MIDDLE KINGDOM TRANQUIL VISION  ~70K 

LAN LAROSH          HARMLESS            ~ 40K

KUMALA                 -do-                      ~ 40K

TARNOST               -d0-                       ~50K

STORMSTONE ISLE -do-                       ~35K

i will like to clear that i am not anti-harmless or anti-peace its not my fault that these are the only two alliances who seem to have big armies and are using them

INVICTUS also seems to have a great army but they don't have that many as of now

PS:I ve only scouted 25 squares so far


Posted By: geofrey
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 18:08
The Zanpur Tourny Square has over 70k Invictus archers on it's large mountain. 


Posted By: JimJams
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 23:08
So it's ok to scout all the squares and publish results ?

-------------


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 23:44
This is the current list of total lost at these locations (THANK YOU DEVS)

[138|-479] in Arran - 214,298
[-396|-572] in Azura - 89,265
[872|-632] in Djebeli - 9,030
[904|-488] in Elijal - 16,856
[-519|-905] in Farra Isle - 1,758
[-830|334] in Fremorn - 34,281
[-380|696] in Kal Tirikan - 175,390
[576|-829] in Kem - 58,995
[-516|-4] in Keppen - 74,455
[772|-163] in Keshalia - 58,692
[886|-349] in Kul Tar - 5,570
[-924|-488] in Kumala - 88,705
[-544|-412] in Lan Larosh - 35,671
[907|280] in Laoshin - 26,005
[748|-853] in Larn - 12,198
[372|12] in Lucerna - 21,154
[638|59] in Mal Motsha - 22,429
[-436|250] in Meilla - 109,753
[85|-22] in Middle Kingdom - 220,811
[-36|328] in Norweld - 85,931
[308|-260] in Perrigor - 142,177
[761|781] in Qarosslan - 30,537
[448|325] in Ragallon - 55,966
[-683|-879] in Rill Archipelago - 17,455
[-51|-987] in Stormstone Island - 21,757
[-24|-756] in Tallimar - 93,936
[812|573] in Tamarin - 29,362
[699|292] in Taomist - 19,106
[-823|826] in The Wastes - 89,764
[-825|-127] in The Western Realms - 135,486
[-166|-199] in Tor Carrock - 180,196
[441|-925] in Trome - 16,521
[400|-504] in Turalia - 46,419
[494|840] in Ursor - 43,482
[355|564] in Windlost - 86,837
[109|743] in Wolgast - 79,288
[614|-521] in Zanpur - 60,751



Now this is the list organized by Total lost:

[138|-479] in Arran - 214,298
[85|-22] in Middle Kingdom - 220,811
[-166|-199] in Tor Carrock - 180,196
[-380|696] in Kal Tirikan - 175,390
[308|-260] in Perrigor - 142,177
[-825|-127] in The Western Realms - 135,486
[-436|250] in Meilla - 109,753
[-24|-756] in Tallimar - 93,936
[-823|826] in The Wastes - 89,764
[-396|-572] in Azura - 89,265
[-924|-488] in Kumala - 88,705
[355|564] in Windlost - 86,837
[-36|328] in Norweld - 85,931
[109|743] in Wolgast - 79,288
[-516|-4] in Keppen - 74,455
[614|-521] in Zanpur - 60,751
[576|-829] in Kem - 58,995
[772|-163] in Keshalia - 58,692
[448|325] in Ragallon - 55,966
[400|-504] in Turalia - 46,419
[494|840] in Ursor - 43,482
[-544|-412] in Lan Larosh - 35,671
[-830|334] in Fremorn - 34,281
[761|781] in Qarosslan - 30,537
[812|573] in Tamarin - 29,362
[907|280] in Laoshin - 26,005
[638|59] in Mal Motsha - 22,429
[-51|-987] in Stormstone Island - 21,757
[372|12] in Lucerna - 21,154
[699|292] in Taomist - 19,106
[-683|-879] in Rill Archipelago - 17,455
[904|-488] in Elijal - 16,856
[441|-925] in Trome - 16,521
[748|-853] in Larn - 12,198
[872|-632] in Djebeli - 9,030
[886|-349] in Kul Tar - 5,570
[-519|-905] in Farra Isle - 1,758


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: SugarFree
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 23:50
amazing

-------------
Nuisance


Posted By: Starry
Date Posted: 25 Feb 2012 at 23:52
nevermind....


-------------
CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule



Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 08:39



-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 09:18
Wow... Fun video!


Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 09:55
Just another example of Packman beating Pingpong eh?

Aint technology grand.


-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: Ander
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 11:43
Brilliant Sunstorm!!!


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 12:03
Its sunday.....there are some epic battles in store for us surely


Posted By: GM Luna
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 12:55
That is awesome SunStorm! :)

-------------
GM Luna | Illyriad Community Manager | community@illyriad.co.uk



Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 17:31
Thanks everyone - I thought it would go well in this EPIC battles post.  That was captured yesterday in Azura. 

I feel it is appropriate to commend SMA for their WONDERFUL coordination!  This is not insider information since the location is easy to find by the surrounding terrain and the battle reports which came flooding in for that location can be seen in the tournament square's information. 

Perhaps other alliances will soon be striking with such precision as was demonstrated by SMA. 


KUDOS!


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 19:46
Indeed, well done to SMA!


Posted By: Maurya
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 21:54
Originally posted by SunStorm SunStorm wrote:

Thanks everyone - I thought it would go well in this EPIC battles post.  That was captured yesterday in Azura. 

I feel it is appropriate to commend SMA for their WONDERFUL coordination!  This is not insider information since the location is easy to find by the surrounding terrain and the battle reports which came flooding in for that location can be seen in the tournament square's information. 

Perhaps other alliances will soon be striking with such precision as was demonstrated by SMA. 


KUDOS!
On behalf of SMA, I thank you for the compliment.  We are grateful for the praise that has been showered upon us by everyone. We were not fighting to win, we knew we wont. It was all for fun and we had tons of it on the Azura battle, and for this to be called an Epic Battle, that's just swell for a training alliance like ours. Big smile

PS: Personally, thanks a gazillion SunStorm for the video. I so badly wanted to watch how the whole attack unfolds on the map but woke up half an hour late for the battle.


Posted By: Danathan
Date Posted: 26 Feb 2012 at 22:23
I echo Maurya's thanks for the praise that has been heaped on our alliance, both publicly here and in GC, as well as the many private messages.

As a training alliance we seek to teach new players how to master many of the intricacies of Illy, and managing a combined alliance wide attack on a single square is certainly a unique opportunity for us with a strict non-aggression policy!

Many of our members learnt lots from this exercise, and I am so glad that we managed to put some doubt into the mighty Harmless? until they realised it was us...
Smile

Credit must be expressed to the upcoming leaders in our alliance like Devish, Maurya, Mirayam, Sweetypie and others who helped make this happen, in addition to The Mariner. Any that I should have mentioned but haven't is not through their unworthyness, but through my poor memory of the many who helped!

Any alliance looking for great graduates who are potential leadership team members would not be silly to talk to these people - Though we WILL try to retain them tooth and nail!

Danathan
Shrapnal's Memorial Academy


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 00:32
Maurya and Danathan - as well as the rest of SMA.  The hit there truly was EPIC! 

You saw my four (blue) troops come running up in that video.  There was a concern - seeing the precision of the attack and the level of coordination that was being displayed - that this attack was coming from one of the large (but yet to get involved) alliances.  I cannot say the entire alliance was nervous, but I can openly speak for myself in stating that I was holding my breath as the first armies were hitting. 

Because I was recording this, I could see that my reinforcements had landed but could not leave the map screen and had no knowledge as to the outcome/losses of the battles.  The losses should not be important for this battle to be considered EPIC.  It was, and is, your alliance and their spectacular teamwork which made this attack EPIC.  Credit should be given where credit is due, and I applaud you! 

I truly hope to see more of this - and expect to since the tournament has just barely commenced.

*and yes, I was scared...  I said it*


-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 01:48
Originally posted by SunStorm SunStorm wrote:

The losses should not be important for this battle to be considered EPIC.  It was, and is, your alliance and their spectacular teamwork which made this attack EPIC.  Credit should be given where credit is due


As an officer of Harmless (?) I would like to extend our endorsement of the above statement.

You deserve all credit and genuinely have our respect and admiration.

Bravo.


-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 05:24
Epic battle, and Epic video as well!

Nicely done, everyone.

SC


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 15:16
the wait is over illyrians....here's the third EPIC battleBig smile
Though this not technically an epic battle its in a way the biggest we have witnessed so far
here are the details
LOCATION:MAL MOTSHA a.k.a THE BIG ORC PIT

ROLE        PLAYER & ALLIANCE CASUALTIES

ATTACKER RARITOR mCROW         40K
DEFENDER THE COLONY               65K

The larger battle consisted of three small ones (same attacker and defender in each case) and were scattered over a period of 5 mins(only)...the largest of which had around 45k casualties

NO HARMLESS THIS TIMEWink


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 19:37
special mention should also go to the arran sqaure.....i think its the first square to cross 400k casualties if i am not missing something.......what you guys are doing..hit the other squares too ;)


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 19:47
It could be that the Arran square has become a matter of pride.  Not quite sure, but 400k lost is a scary thought.

-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 27 Feb 2012 at 20:36
invictus must be very brave to occupy that square.....they have got an army of atleast 40k mens according to my sources*



*not gonna tell who 


Posted By: JimJams
Date Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 23:40
Originally posted by Llyorn Of Jaensch Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:

Originally posted by SunStorm SunStorm wrote:

The losses should not be important for this battle to be considered EPIC.  It was, and is, your alliance and their spectacular teamwork which made this attack EPIC.  Credit should be given where credit is due


As an officer of Harmless (?) I would like to extend our endorsement of the above statement.

You deserve all credit and genuinely have our respect and admiration.

Bravo.

I have to add, it was especially valuable coming from a training alliance.

/bow


-------------


Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 01:03
SMA's assault was among the most impressive that I have witnessed in Illy.  It was as dramatic as the Circus Parade that Peace conducted in Tourney 1 at -500|0


Posted By: Kurfist
Date Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 02:44
Epic battle was Epic.






-------------
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin


Posted By: Ashtar
Date Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 03:45
On Behalf of TCOL - Thank you for mentioning our battle. This tournament has been a great training experience.

Ashtar 


-------------
Do not believe what your teacher tells you merely out of respect for the teacher. -
     Buddha


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 12:15
we got another epic battle after quite a gap.........

LOCATION: FARRA ISLE (idk if it has to do anything with my post in tourney v thread 

ATTACKER:LLYORN OF JANESCH(H?)  CASUALTIES:27,330

DEFENDER:SLAVES TO ARMOK           CASUALTIES:32,598

                                               TOTAL CASUALTIES:59,928 (>50,000 check)

RESULT:EPIC BATTLEThumbs Up

i know many people telling that what smaller alliances can earn from this tourney and respect was in top position in all of them........STA has won respect and bucket loads of it from me for their valiant effort in farra isleClap


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 13:04
We have got another epic battle just nowSmile
It consisted of two battles sepraated by just a minute!

here is the overall picture

LOCATION: TOR CARROCK 


ATTACKER:DAENE(VIC)                       CASUALTIES:~25K

DEFENDER:RES IPSA LOQUITOR         CASUALTIES:~50K


                                                 TOTAL CASUALTIES:~75K


Posted By: Silverlake
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 20:49
Originally posted by Gossip Boy Gossip Boy wrote:

...(idk if it has to do anything with my post in tourney v thread... 


self-ag·gran·dize·ment
n.
The act or practice of enhancing or exaggerating one's own importance, power, or reputation.


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 01 Mar 2012 at 22:06
Originally posted by Silverlake Silverlake wrote:

Originally posted by Gossip Boy Gossip Boy wrote:

...(idk if it has to do anything with my post in tourney v thread... 


self-ag·gran·dize·ment
n.
The act or practice of enhancing or exaggerating one's own importance, power, or reputation.


thanks for whatever that is..


Posted By: zolvon
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 11:10
there was over 80k in kumala...

I say well done xbloodpoolx Clap

this game needs more of your kinda nouse.




Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 12:41
Originally posted by zolvon zolvon wrote:

there was over 80k in kumala...

I say well done xbloodpoolx Clap

this game needs more of your kinda nouse.


Errrrrm...... Ooooookay.


-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: Gossip Boy
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 15:16
Originally posted by zolvon zolvon wrote:

there was over 80k in kumala...

I say well done xbloodpoolx Clap

this game needs more of your kinda nouse.



i can't see this battle in kumala details



Posted By: Kumomoto
Date Posted: 05 Mar 2012 at 17:36
Because there wasn't one.


Posted By: Llyorn Of Jaensch
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2012 at 18:27
Pssst! Lucerna! Pssst! Drejan! Pssst! Dlords!

-------------
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule


Posted By: Daefis
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2012 at 18:34
.......That was a monster hit.......



Posted By: Mandarins31
Date Posted: 06 Mar 2012 at 19:15
Such an excellent battle! Rank 1 all over Illyriad's history in terms of casualties caused in one shot. Also, impressive kill ratio. Congrats to Drejan ;)


Posted By: Drejan
Date Posted: 07 Mar 2012 at 00:20
Thank you!


Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 07 Mar 2012 at 00:54
well done Drejan


Posted By: Rill
Date Posted: 09 Mar 2012 at 02:36
Congratulations to Rhyagelle for an epic series of battles in The Wastes.  Over the course of about 2 hours, multiple armies took out more than 65,000 defenders.  Curse defended strongly but was overwhelmed by the coordinated effort.

Well done!


Posted By: SunStorm
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2012 at 20:05
As some of you are aware, there was a slight disturbance in the force yesterday over at [-830|334] in Fremorn.  I set up my system to record (around 22:48) it for your viewing pleasure.


Above = Zoomed In
Below = Zoomed out

 
Kudos to [FreE], [Calcr], and [Curse]!




-------------
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR



Posted By: invictusa
Date Posted: 11 Mar 2012 at 20:51
Thanks sunstorm.

Shortly after this, Fremorn became the first tourney tile to hit 1,000,000 casualties.


-------------
...and miles to go before I sleep.


Posted By: M6 Redneck
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2012 at 00:14
Mount Doom we are calling it in Calcr...


Posted By: invictusa
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2012 at 03:39
Originally posted by M6 Redneck M6 Redneck wrote:

Mount Doom we are calling it in Calcr...

I can't think of a better name for it.
...
I put forward the motion to make the name official.


-------------
...and miles to go before I sleep.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net