Southeast 500|-500
Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Tournament I - Hold the Flags!
Forum Description: 1st Tournament - Details, progress, reports & awards
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=1514
Printed Date: 29 Mar 2024 at 15:22 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Southeast 500|-500
Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Subject: Southeast 500|-500
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 01:15
Replies:
Posted By: Hora
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 01:59
Many, many thanks for those rewards
...still wondering, who actually attacked our square with siege weapons...
|
Posted By: Sloter5
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 16:04
There is one mistake:
largest number of casualties was inflicted by HM 25JAN at 17:31, not by fliper
|
Posted By: HonoredMule
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 23:16
Sloter5 wrote:
There is one mistake:
largest number of casualties was inflicted by HM 25JAN at 17:31, not by fliper
|
I was about to correct you, but I just reviewed the numbers myself, and you're right. I beat fliper by a whopping 3 casualties (12,066 of my own Wardancers sacrificed in exchange for a mere 5,679 enemy casualties).
Attacking stacked mountain was brutal. In theory bows should have done much better, but the results showed only a very tiny advantage over infantry (about 10% of attacking army size).
|
Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2011 at 01:33
HonoredMule wrote:
Sloter5 wrote:
There is one mistake:
largest number of casualties was inflicted by HM 25JAN at 17:31, not by fliper
|
I was about to correct you, but I just reviewed the numbers myself, and you're right. I beat fliper by a whopping 3 casualties (12,066 of my own Wardancers sacrificed in exchange for a mere 5,679 enemy casualties).
Attacking stacked mountain was brutal. In theory bows should have done much better, but the results showed only a very tiny advantage over infantry (about 10% of attacking army size).
|
Quick q, though - excluding commanders were the numbers I provided right? As mentioned, all casualty calcs are excl commanders.
|
Posted By: HonoredMule
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2011 at 05:21
My numbers were based off the herald. The total was what showed up in the current tournaments page, and enemy casualties the difference between that and my unit count without commanders. Naturally, I don't know whether the numbers in the herald included commanders. My army had 4.
|
Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2011 at 10:24
HonoredMule wrote:
My numbers were based off the herald. The total was what showed up in the current tournaments page, and enemy casualties the difference between that and my unit count without commanders. Naturally, I don't know whether the numbers in the herald included commanders. My army had 4.
|
Ah, looking at the timing, I guess it was a copy'pasta error:
Largest Number of Attacking Units in a Single Attack: 12,066 by HonoredMule on 25JAN11 at 17:31 Largest Number of Casualties (both sides) in a Single Attack: 17,742 by flipper at 25JAN11 at 17:31
Unlikely that both attacks occurred on the identical minute :)
Have corrected this now.
SC
|
Posted By: HonoredMule
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2011 at 12:37
Cool. I guess all the Brannigan-fame goes to me after all.
|
Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 04 Feb 2011 at 13:00
Brannigan: One day, a man has everything. Then the next day, he blows up a billion
dollar space station. And then the next day, he has nothing. Makes you
think, huh, Kif?
Kif: No.
|
|