Print Page | Close Window

NorthEast 500|500

Printed From: Illyriad
Category: The World
Forum Name: Tournament I - Hold the Flags!
Forum Description: 1st Tournament - Details, progress, reports & awards
URL: http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/forum_posts.asp?TID=1512
Printed Date: 16 Apr 2024 at 18:34
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: NorthEast 500|500
Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Subject: NorthEast 500|500
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 01:13
NORTHEAST SQUARE (500|500)

WINNERS: HARMLESS? [H?]
SQUARE CASUALTY RANK: 8/8 (73,255 Casualties)

THE REWARDS

H? Alliance will receive:
  • 5M Gold Pieces from King Sigurd, delivered to the Alliance Coffers
Each player listed under the "Individual Winners" category below will receive:
  • 50 King's Praetorian Guardsmen (unique units)
  • 100 Prestige points to spend as they wish
Congratulations to H?!

Further Details as follows:

FLAG POSSESSION SUMMARY
  1. Harmless?     29d 15hr 4m 37s
  2. Dwarven Lords     9hr 4m 1s
  3. Order of the Phoenix     4hr 47m 2s
  4. Curse of the Wolves     4hr 3m 59s
  5. Goonies     32m
FLAG POSSESSION HISTORY

04JAN11 23:51 to 01FEB11 00:00    Harmless? [H?]
04JAN11 23:04 to 04JAN11 23:51    Curse of the Wolves [Curse]
04JAN11 04:27 to 04JAN11 23:04    Harmless? [H?]
04JAN11 03:55 to 04JAN11 04:27    Goonies [GOON]
03JAN11 01:36 to 04JAN11 03:55    Harmless? [H?]
03JAN11 01:30 to 03JAN11 01:36    Order of the Phoenix [OotP]
03JAN11 01:08 to 03JAN11 01:30    Harmless? [H?]
02JAN11 16:04 to 03JAN11 01:08    Dwarven Lords [Dlord]
02JAN11 01:27 to 02JAN11 16:04    Harmless? [H?]
02JAN11 00:19 to 02JAN11 01:27    Order of the Phoenix [OotP]
01JAN11 21:19 to 02JAN11 00:19    Harmless? [H?]
01JAN11 18:02 to 01JAN11 21:19    Curse of the Wolves [Curse]
01JAN11 14:29 to 01JAN11 18:02    Order of the Phoenix [OotP]
01JAN11 00:00 to 01JAN11 14:29    [Unoccupied]

INDIVIDUAL WINNERS

The H? players who participated in this occupation, ranked in order of their participation in the tournament (defined as losses they received during interaction with the flag location) are as follows:
  1. Waylander    (Casualties received: 12599)
  2. Llyorn Of Jaensch    (Casualties received: 8620)
  3. Amorphias    (Casualties received: 6107)
  4. KillerPoodle    (Casualties received: 5131)
  5. Wendel63    (Casualties received: 1564)
  6. Blood Lust    (Casualties received: 1294)
  7. Mr Andersson    (Casualties received: 1086)
  8. Rwdnyll    (Casualties received: 1021)
  9. Lucens    (Casualties received: 649)
  10. edslee    (Casualties received: 600)
  11. bow locks    (Casualties received: 348)
  12. beetchin    (Casualties received: 344)
  13. GreatDane    (Casualties received: 335)
  14. MalMal    (Casualties received: 275)
  15. Createure    (Casualties received: 246)
  16. Rorsach    (Casualties received: 154)
  17. Sho'Nuff    (Casualties received: 142)
  18. bartimeus    (Casualties received: 103)
  19. Humbaz    (Casualties received: 102)
  20. Phym    (Casualties received: 77)
  21. Sara    (Casualties received: 44)
  22. Wtower    (Casualties received: 38)
  23. Sarky    (Casualties received: 37)
  24. HonoredMule    (Casualties received: 1)
  25. Kumomoto    (Casualties received: 0)
  26. Misteuraix    (Casualties received: 0)
  27. torshavn    (Casualties received: 0)
  28. Beagletown *no combat, but turned up on square*
  29. Callous *no combat, but turned up on square*
  30. Empress Olivia *no combat, but turned up on square*

THE CHALLENGERS FOR THIS SQUARE

Players who didn't belong to the winning alliance suffered the following casualties during interactions with the flag location:
  1. fangy    [GOON]    (Casualties received: 11115)
  2. Xaylia    [Dlord]    (Casualties received: 5992)
  3. sityviper    [OotP]    (Casualties received: 4458)
  4. Belargyle    [Dlord]    (Casualties received: 3994)
  5. Wolfhound    [Curse]    (Casualties received: 2139)
  6. Iduna    [Curse]    (Casualties received: 1750)
  7. Y`diss Klis    [peac3]    (Casualties received: 1498)
  8. John Marston    [=CE=]    (Casualties received: 366)
  9. Uuntaar    [DB]    (Casualties received: 272)
  10. G0DsDestroyer    [Sir]    (Casualties received: 243)
  11. sum dup    [CrowB]    (Casualties received: 229)
  12. sityviper I    [OotP]    (Casualties received: 198)
  13. Dunwick    [GOON]    (Casualties received: 61)
  14. Alegut    [Dlord]    (Casualties received: 23)
DEFENDING LOSSES BY UNIT
  1. Longbowman    (Casualties received: 11482)
  2. Wardancer    (Casualties received: 5960)
  3. Death Dealer    (Casualties received: 4554)
  4. Marshal    (Casualties received: 3200)
  5. Pikeman    (Casualties received: 3045)
  6. Clan Guardsman    (Casualties received: 2072)
  7. Phalanx    (Casualties received: 1917)
  8. Man-at-Arms    (Casualties received: 1897)
  9. Swordsman    (Casualties received: 1667)
  10. Stalwart    (Casualties received: 1211)
  11. Knight    (Casualties received: 958)
  12. Crossbowman    (Casualties received: 753)
  13. Halbardier    (Casualties received: 581)
  14. Runerider    (Casualties received: 578)
  15. Fist    (Casualties received: 455)
  16. Kobold Cohort    (Casualties received: 403)
  17. Elven Trueshot    (Casualties received: 263)
  18. Sentinel    (Casualties received: 260)
  19. Charioteer    (Casualties received: 250)
  20. Protector    (Casualties received: 230)
  21. Axman    (Casualties received: 208)
  22. Fang    (Casualties received: 204)
  23. Swiftsteed    (Casualties received: 144)
  24. Militiaman    (Casualties received: 125)
  25. Archer    (Casualties received: 113)
  26. Warden    (Casualties received: 43)
  27. Yeoman    (Casualties received: 42)
  28. Clanguard    (Casualties received: 38)
  29. Packsman    (Casualties received: 33)
  30. Slinger    (Casualties received: 29)
  31. Wolfrider    (Casualties received: 1)
ATTACKING LOSSES BY UNIT
  1. Stalwart    (Casualties received: 7200)
  2. Halbardier    (Casualties received: 3628)
  3. Crossbowman    (Casualties received: 3449)
  4. Runerider    (Casualties received: 2680)
  5. Swordsman    (Casualties received: 1905)
  6. Pikeman    (Casualties received: 1400)
  7. Man-at-Arms    (Casualties received: 1337)
  8. Longbowman    (Casualties received: 1324)
  9. Axman    (Casualties received: 1264)
  10. Phalanx    (Casualties received: 1020)
  11. Clan Guardsman    (Casualties received: 991)
  12. Elven Trueshot    (Casualties received: 838)
  13. Wardancer    (Casualties received: 813)
  14. Militiaman    (Casualties received: 720)
  15. Knight    (Casualties received: 642)
  16. Marshal    (Casualties received: 247)
  17. Packsman    (Casualties received: 223)
  18. Charioteer    (Casualties received: 185)
  19. Kobold Cohort    (Casualties received: 181)
  20. Fang    (Casualties received: 129)
  21. Clanguard    (Casualties received: 120)
  22. Archer    (Casualties received: 115)
  23. Slinger    (Casualties received: 56)
  24. Yeoman    (Casualties received: 27)
  25. Swiftsteed    (Casualties received: 24)
  26. Death Pack    (Casualties received: 21)

OTHER DATA
Winning Alliance's Count of Armies Participating: 71
Winning Alliance's Count of Commanders Participating: 110
Largest Number of Defending Units on Square: 56,280 units on 18JAN11 at 01:42
Largest Number of Attacking Units in a Single Attack: 5,792 by fangy on 04JAN11 at 03:54
Largest Number of Casualties (both sides) in a Single Attack: 14,538 by fangy on 03JAN11 at 17:21
Defenders Awarded Total Commander Experience of: 82,590
Attackers Awarded Total Commander Experience of: 121,107

NB. Casualty Data Excludes Commanders



Replies:
Posted By: Callous
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 02:33
Is there some criteria that you have to have been attacked while at the flag to receive credit for being there? I sent forces to this flag yet my name isn't listed. I was only there a short time < 1 day I recall, and I don't remember being attacked while I was there but I was part of the occupation?


Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 02:47
Originally posted by Callous Callous wrote:

Is there some criteria that you have to have been attacked while at the flag to receive credit for being there? I sent forces to this flag yet my name isn't listed. I was only there a short time < 1 day I recall, and I don't remember being attacked while I was there but I was part of the occupation?


Yes, atm the criteria is exactly that: Participation at the flag is only noted by 'participation in a combat event' in the logs I used for this dataset.

We do have logs which would show non-combat arrivals at the flags, and I could cross-reference these for the final grant of reward by square.

But I'll need to think awhile on whether a brief, breezy and uneventful visit to a flag that didn't involve combat participation constitutes true, participatory "risk and reward".

My head tells me that it does according to the (need-to-tighten-up-before-the-next-tournament) ruleset I published , but my heart says "meh" Smile

SC


Posted By: The_Dude
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 02:54
As I read the original write up for the tourney awards, a mere 1 minute Occupy Hold on a flag would qualify the member of the winning alliance to the spoils of victory.  I even encouraged people to play that tactic.  But hey, not my awards to hand out.  ;)


Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 03:06
Originally posted by The_Dude The_Dude wrote:

As I read the original write up for the tourney awards, a mere 1 minute Occupy Hold on a flag would qualify the member of the winning alliance to the spoils of victory.  I even encouraged people to play that tactic.  But hey, not my awards to hand out.  ;)


Yuppers on all fronts.

Our next official tournie will have a vastly tightened ruleset to prevent "prize tourism" (and I'm emphatically not meaning to imply that this has happened in this particular circumstance).

I will add in, as a supplement, non-combat participants to each square, and note them in an addendum to each post.

SC




Posted By: Callous
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 03:18
No need to imply, that's exactly what I did. However if the rules said otherwise then I would have parked an army there for as long as it took to qualify. The only reason I didn't stay longer was so that I could have my forces closer to home to respond to other needs.


Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 03:30
Originally posted by Callous Callous wrote:

No need to imply, that's exactly what I did. However if the rules said otherwise then I would have parked an army there for as long as it took to qualify. The only reason I didn't stay longer was so that I could have my forces closer to home to respond to other needs.


Fair enough indeed, sirrah.

It's certainly within the published rules, and so I will expand out the reward selection criteria to include non-combat participants as prize recipients as well for each square reward.

I'll add in the additional players in a supplement later today.

Best,

SC




Posted By: GM Stormcrow
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 14:36
[EDIT: 3 players added to reward list for turning up although not participating in combat]

  1. Beagletown *no combat, but turned up on square*
  2. Callous *no combat, but turned up on square*
  3. Empress Olivia *no combat, but turned up on square*



Posted By: Mr Andersson
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 14:58
Originally posted by Callous Callous wrote:

No need to imply, that's exactly what I did. However if the rules said otherwise then I would have parked an army there for as long as it took to qualify. The only reason I didn't stay longer was so that I could have my forces closer to home to respond to other needs.

I used the same tactics for SW and S flag. Turned up for a brief period. Hence no reward (yet?).

Edit: It seems i'm also in the report now =))

I do understand you (Illy) don't want to encourage prize tourism, but had I known the rules I would off course parked the army for a longer period.


-------------
MrA


Posted By: Callous
Date Posted: 03 Feb 2011 at 18:45
Originally posted by GM Stormcrow GM Stormcrow wrote:

[EDIT: 3 players added to reward list for turning up although not participating in combat]

  1. Beagletown *no combat, but turned up on square*
  2. Callous *no combat, but turned up on square*
  3. Empress Olivia *no combat, but turned up on square*



Thanks!

You are truly a gentleman and a scholar. Clap



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net