Inactive Players

Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

   To clarify, the exploits I see have nothing to do with preventing sieges.  Mostly they involve the possibility that people will create alts for the purpose of sieging and capturing cities on their main, after suspending the account(s).

Author	Message Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
Rill Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster General Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 2160	Post Options Post Reply Quote Rill Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2012 at 00:22
	To clarify, the exploits I see have nothing to do with preventing sieges. Mostly they involve the possibility that people will create alts for the purpose of sieging and capturing cities on their main, after suspending the account(s).

Aurordan Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 204	Post Options Post Reply Quote Aurordan Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2012 at 00:44
	Well, my response was bow locks, who the GMs have seen fit to silence, but really that is not forbidden either as far as I've seen. Though I would feel like I was tempting fate trying something like that.

Rill Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Postmaster General Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 2160	Post Options Post Reply Quote Rill Thanks(0) Quote Reply Posted: 06 Feb 2012 at 00:54
	What I described is not forbidden, but I think it is an exploitable mechanic and should be deemed such. Naturally only the GMs can decide if it is an exploit and if it is whether it is worth changing the game mechanics to prevent it from occurring. Edited by Rill - 06 Feb 2012 at 00:56