Inactive Players |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
Thorsson
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jan 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Inactive PlayersPosted: 04 Feb 2012 at 11:52 |
|
Does (Suspended) indicate that a player is inactive? If not, how do you tell?
|
|
![]() |
|
Beriadanwen
Greenhorn
Joined: 10 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 98 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 12:14 |
|
Suspended means that the account has been closed. It may have been abandoned willfully or closed by the GMs for violations. Usually it's the former.
|
|
![]() |
|
Thorsson
New Poster
Joined: 28 Jan 2012 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 6 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 16:23 |
|
Thanks, but is there any indication if someone has just stopped playing?
|
|
![]() |
|
Nokigon
Postmaster
Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 948 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 16:37 |
|
You've got to watch them for a while, and if there's no pop change in two or three weeks then it's a fair guess they're MIA.
|
|
|
High Council inside the Cave
|
|
![]() |
|
Raatalagk
New Poster
Joined: 13 Dec 2011 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 16:39 |
|
Watch their population and see if it changes. Send them a mail in game, asking politely if they are active. Wait at least 7 days. If you get no response and see no population change, then they are probably inactive.
Inactive players who aren't suspended might come back to their account, however, so be prepared for that. Also, if they are part of an alliance, even if they seem inactive, it is prudent to consult with their alliance leaders before, say, laying siege to their cities.
|
|
![]() |
|
dunnoob
Wordsmith
Joined: 10 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 106 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 16:39 |
There are some inconclusive indicators for inactive (but not obviously suspended) accounts: Pop below X for some value of X not changing, empty profile, hamlet name "new settlement", no alliance, only one town for the given player, master spies reporting an empty build and empty research queue. Example, I consider pop less than 100 without rainbow as "suspicious", but that alone is not clear enough for an inactivity raid.
|
|
![]() |
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1120 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 04 Feb 2012 at 20:18 |
|
If you get an email from them objecting that you are reducing their town to rubble then they are NOT an inactive...
(just kidding) |
|
![]() |
|
bow locks
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Mar 2010 Status: Offline Points: 205 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Feb 2012 at 14:51 |
|
DEVS - PLEASE REMOVE SUSPENDED ACCOUNTS!!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 2160 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Feb 2012 at 19:07 |
|
Suspended accounts are awesome target practice for newbs and large ones are nice sources for new cities. However, they open up a number of potential exploits, one of which I've brought to the attention of the developers via petition.
The "Abandon Account" feature is a double-edged sword. Probably overall the game is better for it, and it surely must save a lot of time for the developers who don't have to manually remove accounts for people who want to ragequit or start over.
|
|
![]() |
|
Aurordan
Forum Warrior
Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 Feb 2012 at 22:32 |
|
Well, none of those things are against the rules, so I don't see why you think the Dev's should intervene on your behalf. Even if they did create an alt specifically to block a siege on their city, that is completely legitimate. And it's hardly an exploit, since you give up so much in lost sovereignty closing off the eight spaces closest to your town. More like a trade off, which the seem happy with based on the existence of one space islands.
Edit: Wow, context vanished. Edited by Aurordan - 05 Feb 2012 at 22:34 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |