The Demise of Training Alliances |
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Author | |
Rill
Postmaster General Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 7078 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
I was not privy to any conversations in which the neutrality of Toothless? was an issue in the last war. I was not in the leadership group, so it's possible I missed something.
Certainly some members of NS were pretty blatantly partisan and the leader's alt was directly involved in the war, but so far as I know, no NS players took in-game action while in the alliance that were not neutral. I think there were similar concerns expressed by the other side about TOR-U members; again so far as I know there were not any in-game actions directly in support of the war. It has generally been Toothless? position (as prescribed to me when I was a member) that their neutrality includes not voicing an opinion that took either side of a conflict, that is, not even presenting the appearance of partisanship; other training alliances do not necessarily observe that constraint. While I can see the rationale for T?'s stance in terms of members expressing opinions, it can be very difficult to implement in practice, and I don't think it's strictly necessary to observe for a training alliance to be considered neutral. It seems like that sort of thing is best left to the alliance's leadership.
|
|
Post Reply | Page <1 456 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |