RE Stance... |
Post Reply | Page <1 789 |
Author | |||
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Repeating the baseless claim. A cunning riposte. The fact remains the large majority of our sieges have not been attacked by players outside of the alliance.
|
|||
bansisdead
Postmaster Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
You're so lost in your own spin, you cannot see the wood for the tree's. Edited by bansisdead - 24 Jan 2014 at 22:57 |
|||
Daufer
Forum Warrior Joined: 14 Jun 2011 Status: Offline Points: 332 |
Post Options
Thanks(4)
|
||
As H? core territory is about 1000 squares away from us it isn't likely that a siege camp will still be there when their troops arrive, hence we don't ask them to send troops. As far as I can tell no one else does either. Nor do we beg our allies who are dealing with their own sieges to come do our fighting for us. Perhaps you do things differently, I don't know how EE operates. If we ask for tactical advice they loan us a tactician, whose advice we may or may not follow. Since you have already made a point of mentioning the presence of H? alts in TCOL then you really can't claim they haven't, and since you can't produce evidence that we asked for troops and they denied us, your claim is just more of the usual baseless propaganda. Perhaps we could make a deal where you all agree to leave a substantial siege camp in place for two weeks, we ask our allies to help destroy it, and see if they come or not? That would give everyone reading conclusive proof whether or not H? supports its allies. That is, assuming you want to make a real point with real facts instead of just venting more hot air, but I think everyone with more than 7/8 of a brain knows the answer to that question.
|
|||
Aurordan
Postmaster Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Yeah, I could see why H? would want to keep an eye on you.
|
|||
HATHALDIR
Forum Warrior Joined: 01 Jul 2011 Location: Adelaide Status: Offline Points: 380 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
We did send two seiges that were more than 7 days out, one Exo'd, the other was hung out to dry. If we can send, i would hope my allies would do as well
|
|||
There's worse blokes than me!!
|
|||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
WRT the original topic:
It's wide... |
|||
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|||
Darkwords
Postmaster General Joined: 23 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1005 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
There is absolutely no relevance to any of that in regards to what I was saying. RE your first point; of course they are free to play as they see fit, what do think? That I believe you are holding there Grannies at gun point or something? RE your second point; We are merely following the war 'Rules' as laid out on this forum by one of your own 'directors'. Yes, it is our choice to do that, but then again it was your side that first put forward this 'extermination' tactic. This is what I was referring to... sorry if it was over your head. |
|||
<Deranzin> I'd agree with darkone on that
[21:59]<ropadope> you know I am perverted <Bartleby> dark is upsetting some peeps |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 789 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |