Rill wrote:
Silverleaf wrote:
that ridiculous mindset that more means better - I often wonder how many of them would actually stand alone- or have the attitude they do if they did not have a murder of crows backing them?? - I give WAY more respect to the smaller alliances tht stand their ground and the players that seek these smaller alliances. |
Interesting comment coming from a player in a Consone alliance. Last I heard, Consone is substantially larger than Crow. And unlike Crow, which grew rather organically for the most part as players from established Crow alliances began their own alliances and chose to affiliate, Consone is a group of alliances that began independently and decided to announce a confederated group in order to ... apparently establish that they are a group to be reckoned with.
I have nothing against Consone and respect many fine players in Consone. I also have nothing against the idea of a group of alliances that "have each others' backs," whether it's Harmless? and DLords, the Crow alliances, Consone, whatever. I personally think having a large group of friendly players makes that game more fun.
But when one of your members singles out Crows for being a large group of confederated alliances I just have to well ...
|
CE is in Consone!?!?!?!....... Rill must have better information sources than I do then!! Last I checked, CE were NOT in Consone. I do not see any mention of CE being in Consone anywhere except for Rills comments in GC and in this forum. I do not see CE's name on the Consone members list. So I think it is pretty interesting that you Rill, are the only person that I have personally seen refer to CE as being in Consone. That could be an assumption of grave proportions if that were true now wouldn't it!? CE is confederated with a Consone alliance, does that make us part of Consone? I wish you would have told me that my alliance was part of the super-fed earlier Rill!.... We all know what happens when we ASSUME things, right kids?!