The Elgean Alliance |
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Author | |||||||||||||
Hucbold
Forum Warrior Joined: 20 Nov 2015 Location: Meilla Status: Offline Points: 251 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
I take it Ten, you've conceded my point
|
|||||||||||||
Celebrant
Greenhorn Joined: 20 Sep 2017 Location: Bukurest Status: Offline Points: 86 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
Two sides
More then two opinions. One side think that they are saviors of the game. Other side think saviors are terrorist. Third side won. No drop of blood spilled. Stay tuned. |
|||||||||||||
Malek
Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Jul 2012 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 252 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
You probably had to use your troops because you have already used up aviddrivers and peacekeepers troops already. If they still had troops, you would still be using them. 3 top attacks in a week thats great,
Nevermind, its a low scoring week. Keep your chin up, you will get there one day.
|
|||||||||||||
Ten Kulch
Postmaster Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
I hadn't seen those battle reports. So, congratulations on participating in a war that you declared. Can you post the coordinates of those three big attacks? I'm interested in where the fighting happened. |
|||||||||||||
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
|||||||||||||
SOKAPOPIS
Greenhorn Joined: 27 Mar 2017 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||||||||||
there wasnt an insult there , just an obvious diagnostic .
Im sorry if i hate you but you lie from the second you wake up till you go to bed ; You aggress ppl without the start of a reason ; then you speak of yourself all day long with annoying arrogant posture . You have to admit it s not easy to like you . You may pretend that you are an angel in real life , that s at least hard to believe , even if we dont consider you r the biggest liar in that game . The worst part is maybe you making assumptions considering ppl have same simple way of thinking you have . You dont know who we are so all those conclusions tell more about yourself than others . |
|||||||||||||
Grom
Wordsmith Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Location: Mal Motsha Status: Offline Points: 185 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
If you have gotten to the point that you hate another player, you may need to take a break. There is no reason allow such negativity in your life over a few pixels. Also, Ten has done more for this game than many of us can ever hope to achieve. You may not like his style, but attacking him personally is not fair.
|
|||||||||||||
SOKAPOPIS
Greenhorn Joined: 27 Mar 2017 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 46 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||||||||||
I fear you may be right Grom . I originally dont play a game to be annoyed by some ppl but damn that s hard to be insensible when i see some behaviours .
ten kulch pretented he started that war against EE for local security and because we have threatened them . I said that was all wrong , he called me a liar . They razed dozens of our cities . we havent broken any of their sieges . we havent tried to siege them . i can add that none of his local ally has made a war move against us . those are facts , no a picture of any imagination . I dont see who he can convince he wasnt lying about the reasons of what i called an "unprovoked aggression . They pretended they wanted us to leave BL and werent interested in destroying cities but when someone was starting to exo they were rushing his left back cities to raze them all . The reality is the absolute opposite of what he s been pretending from start to the end . He absolutely knew we werent a threat at all and that most of our manpower was in elgea . He absolutely knew that most of our BL troops were burnt during the tourney . He only took advantage of a situation to simply aggress us led by an old anger coming from a defeat in a war finished years ago . Why not simply admit it and try to paint reality and lie all the way . I m starting to hear here and there that this old war would be the cause of all the troubles happening lately , caused by SIN coallition . They would have been in victims side in that war and the actual situation would result of this . I have to remind real history at this point . For those who ignore it or those who have forgoten it or again those who are sensible to SIN propaganda . Years ago when BL didnt exist ,there was an aggressive bully named Sir Bradley , who is Stukkah nowadays . His alliance was declaring wars on every peacefull and defenseless alliances just for the fun of crushing them without meeting any resistance . They made it again and again for monthes . One day what had to happen , happened . The big Elgean alliances decided that had to stop and united cause they were thinking the game was in danger with all those nice and peacefull ppl leaving the game . Even tho sir bradley managed to drag the ranked 1 alliance in the war , being in his side , there was no doubt about the end of the war since elgean alliances were united . Trouble makers got rimed since it was the only option to make them stop their neverending and unprovoked aggressions . Nowadays Stukkah has a beter machine , no doubt , but he s simply repeating history ignoring same causes produce same effects . Again they try to paint reality , puting themselves into the victims side and again they r bullying anytime they have 100% chance to win a war . This tends to work well because for some reasons i cant understand , Elgean alliances take time to unite when it s so obvious it will have to end this way . Of course nowadays there is the ocean and most of SIN crew will be safe thanks to this but i wouldnt be surprised if we end with a cleaned up civilised and peacefull continent north once troublemakers will be rimed or sent to the sea and a continent south with all the agressive bullies left between them with noone to massacre .
|
|||||||||||||
Corwin
Forum Warrior Joined: 21 Jun 2011 Location: Farshards Status: Offline Points: 310 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
it seems time has changed history
|
|||||||||||||
Fanuidhol
Greenhorn Joined: 29 Jan 2017 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 95 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
When I was about 5 or 6 a friend and I were sitting by the pool and witnessed a battle between red ants and black ants. Point is, there's an awful lot of bias in some of these replies.
|
|||||||||||||
Ten Kulch
Postmaster Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Location: Fellandire Status: Offline Points: 678 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||||||
Yes, I did say that. Then when you denied EE had harassed us multiple times, I did indeed call that a lie. Which it is. I also reminded people that [300] is responsible to explain our actions to our allies, not to random critics on the forums, and certainly not to our enemies. If any of our allies still have questions about the 300-EE conflict, they are free to message myself or Tink for a thorough explanation.
I cannot be held responsible for your incompetence at warfare.
We deliberately did not ask our allies to engage. Several friendly alliances offered their support, but we felt that adding more warriors would resemble a pile-on. Seven elite soldiers was enough to fight your alliance. I would like to remind people that our initial objective was to remove six specific EE troublemakers from Gremont. We warned the other EE players against interfering in their removal, but EE escalated anyway (which is completely fair in a war, and receives no complaint from us). At the beginning, we did not just siege everything in sight. First we sieged players who had aggravated us, and then that expanded to players who voluntarily sent troops to fight us. When the war finally expanded to your whole alliance after several weeks, we immediately published guidelines for personal surrenders. Those terms were merciful by Illyriad standards, and were very generous compared to the terms that your own alliance has offered defeated opponents in the past. If you are outclassed and don't surrender, then you get what you get.
I personally wrote to Mak on four separate occasions to propose terms of surrender. After his fourth refusal and a very obvious attempt at stalling us, we exercised extreme force against his remaining cities in Broken Lands. He had three different opportunities to walk away with all his cities and return to Elgea, penalty-free. (By the fourth offer, he had lost two cities). Any friendly alliance leaders who are interested in reading the IGM exchanges, I am happy to demonstrate proof that Mak simply wouldn't accept our very reasonable surrender terms. You can read the mails and judge for yourselves.
Take that up with Stuk. I will say that your portrayal of the Grand Alliance as virtuous liberators, and the Coalition as dastardly villains, is entertaining but obviously ridiculous. The GA and the Coalition were two sides who clashed in war for very many reasons. Representing those reasons as pure good versus pure evil is insulting to the intelligence of everyone reading these discussions. |
|||||||||||||
Check out my blog, Warmongering in Illyriad for self-defense techniques, military city construction, and PvP strategies.
|
|||||||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1 34567> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |