Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 16OCT12 - Customizable Avatars
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed16OCT12 - Customizable Avatars

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
demdigs View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 660
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 16:34
what was all fixed for the sieges?

Back to Top
Smoking GNU View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Location: Windhoek
Status: Offline
Points: 313
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:07
Originally posted by demdigs demdigs wrote:

what was all fixed for the sieges?


I'm hoping the big siege bug that lets the sieger completely avoid the defending army inside the sieged city and just automatically win when storming it.
Back to Top
Anjire View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:28
Originally posted by GM Luna GM Luna wrote:


Other Changes:
The siege code has been over-hauled to remove any glitches. An outstanding bug relating to defense against storm and raze attempts has been fixed. Sieges should now work exactly as intended.

GM Luna

Is this only a fix for the defenders in a city not able to defend verse a raze attempt now?  Or did they also the fix the glitch allowing unlimited siege engines to fire within a single army unit?  (see petition 5063).  

Back to Top
Rorgash View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:30
Originally posted by Anjire Anjire wrote:

Originally posted by GM Luna GM Luna wrote:


Other Changes:
The siege code has been over-hauled to remove any glitches. An outstanding bug relating to defense against storm and raze attempts has been fixed. Sieges should now work exactly as intended.

GM Luna

Is this only a fix for the defenders in a city not able to defend verse a raze attempt now?  Or did they also the fix the glitch allowing unlimited siege engines to fire within a single army unit?  (see petition 5063).  

You highlighted it and didnt see it? let me repeat it: Sieges should now work exactly as intended.
Back to Top
dunnoob View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Location: Elijal
Status: Offline
Points: 800
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:46
Originally posted by Anjire Anjire wrote:

Or did they also the fix the glitch allowing unlimited siege engines to fire within a single army unit?  (see petition 5063).
What's that about?  Was there a limit before the various siege bugs in or before the April release?  Do walls now survive a capture?  If you need a town for a quick test check out fight for your right (walls at level 16 at the moment.)
Back to Top
Arakamis View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jul 2012
Location: Waterdeep
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:48
define exactly rorgash. :)
Back to Top
Rorgash View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:51
ex·act·ly  (g-zktl)
adv.
1. In an exact manner; accurately.
2. In all respects; just: Do exactly as you please.
3. As you say. Used to indicate agreement.


Edited by Rorgash - 17 Oct 2012 at 17:51
Back to Top
Anjire View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:56
Originally posted by Rorgash Rorgash wrote:

Originally posted by Anjire Anjire wrote:

Originally posted by GM Luna GM Luna wrote:


Other Changes:
The siege code has been over-hauled to remove any glitches. An outstanding bug relating to defense against storm and raze attempts has been fixed. Sieges should now work exactly as intended.

GM Luna

Is this only a fix for the defenders in a city not able to defend verse a raze attempt now?  Or did they also the fix the glitch allowing unlimited siege engines to fire within a single army unit?  (see petition 5063).  

You highlighted it and didnt see it? let me repeat it: Sieges should now work exactly as intended.

6/1/2012
From GM SC
[02:09]<GM Stormcrow> @Anjire - bear in mind that's 30 per siege camp... multiple siege camps are possible etc.

I am hoping they fixed this as well.  

Back to Top
Arakamis View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jul 2012
Location: Waterdeep
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 17:57
Originally posted by Rorgash Rorgash wrote:

1. In an exact manner; accurately.
2. In all respects; just: Do exactly as you please.
3. As you say. Used to indicate agreement.

Smile good one..

so define In all respects then.

Exactly alone does not mean anything in this context, as we can't know what's going on in Dev's minds. :)

edit: typo


Edited by Arakamis - 17 Oct 2012 at 17:58
Back to Top
Rorgash View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Oct 2012 at 18:06
It works as they want it to, so if they are telling the truth there are NO, i repeat NO BUGS LEFT in thes siege code anymore, so if you find something wrong its not a bug but something they either didnt think about or wanted there or something else.

There is NO more bugs is what he said.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.