| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Zlyph 
New Poster
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1
|
 Topic: Destroy your own settlement
Posted: 12 Jun 2012 at 12:58 |
|
If there is 0 buildings in a town the person holding should have teh option to raze it
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 14:30 |
 Zork2012 wrote:
Rill, get your facts straight, Jude and Borg did the 2 tile isle together and they used exodus to do it,it was a brilliant idea, i know because it was mine |
Aahhh, meta-gaming at its best. 
Yes Rill, creating a cool-down feature on abandoning (5 days from the moment it was abandoned) could also take care of the abuse...
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Anjire
Postmaster
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 12:58 |
|
Facts are facts:
Actually, the exodus gambit didn't work due to the rampant bugs in the initial roll out. It was the use of Tenaril of a 5 pop alt that was able to secure StJude's city from being sieged directly on the two square island.
Mind you, this interaction did spark a number of quick changes to both Exodus and Tenaril that helped clear up a number of uses the devs did not intend.
~Anjire
|
|
Zork2012
Wordsmith
Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 135
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 12:22 |
[QUOTE=Rill]
Such cities could also be placed around a city as a second "wall" to prevent sieges. I am reminded of StJude's gambit of using an alt to Tenaril a city next to his own on a two-square island.
Rill, get your facts straight, Jude and Borg did the 2 tile isle together and they used exodus to do it,
it was a brilliant idea, i know because it was mine
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 11:14 |
Rill wrote:
Perhaps if the population of the town were over 0, it would have to be in the location for at least 5 days prior to being abandoned? |
Now that idea I like too. It would fall in line with not being able to send out an army ir diplomatic force 5 days after exodus'ing a town.
Clever thinking little crow. :)
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 7078
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 06:17 |
Being able to abandon a town in a condition that leaves it unowned sounds pretty good to me.
A potential issue I could see with this would be people "seeding" the map with such towns in order to prevent others from Tenariling or Exodusing to a location. Sure, the towns could be sieged down, but that is time-consuming.
Such cities could also be placed around a city as a second "wall" to prevent sieges. I am reminded of StJude's gambit of using an alt to Tenaril a city next to his own on a two-square island.
Perhaps if the population of the town were over 0, it would have to be in the location for at least 5 days prior to being abandoned?
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 06:10 |
|
I am not sure I agree with an abandoned city being capturable without lowering its population first. It does sound like an exploit for meta-gamers. However, I haven't heard hardly any negative feedback to this proposed game enhancement.
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Cerex Flikex
Forum Warrior
Joined: 11 Apr 2012
Location: BC
Status: Offline
Points: 211
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 05:44 |
|
Perhaps a new thread in Suggestions regarding abandoning towns would be a good idea? Just a thought lol.
|
|
|
|
dunnoob
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Location: Elijal
Status: Offline
Points: 800
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 04:56 |
Sisren wrote:
Or how about this, if a town becomes abandoned, it becomes part of a faction? |
Works for me, we already know that factions will "soon" (as of 2010-08) recall who attacked them, and fight back, or remove trading favours from their enemies.
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 05 Jun 2012 at 04:21 |
Or how about this, if a town becomes abandoned, it becomes part of a faction? Perhaps the closest by distance? and that town could build itself over time, and act as if it's in that faction?
This IMO would give the aggressive players a run for their money...
|
|
Tweet
Destroy your own settlement
