Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Prometheuz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 235
|
Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 09:56 |
Tordenkaffen wrote:
@Karpin - We have no one but ourselves to thank if Harmless? get an open playing field to drive this tourney home. I suggest alliances calculate with spending soldiers to snipe at the leader.
|
Well Tord must be a far seeing player because this particular strategy is beginning to gather pace. I do so admire visionaries
|
|
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 04:18 |
Somebody watches the CW network way too much
|
|
Berde
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 380
|
Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 03:48 |
Like Kirsten Dunst?
|
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 03:46 |
Gossip Boy wrote:
i am gonna definitely attack some H? squares |
Bring it.
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
|
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 496
|
Posted: 29 Feb 2012 at 00:03 |
Gossip Boy wrote:
If you wanna brand me as anti-H?,i ve no problems with that i know you 've faced some competition in tallimar and azura but you are occupying 9 squares don't you wanna tell about the other 7 (someone used selective fact picking i remember) and one thing finally if you feel that i wanna see H? suffer heavy losses than you are right i do and everybody does coz no body wanna see the winner having an easy ride (ALI wouldn't ve been remembered so much if he won all his matches in first round) but sadly that isn't happening.i am quite a small player but i am gonna definitely attack some H? squares
|
Well, I think you should do some more homework, because H? is actually just a few thousands away from top casualties (Peace is the leader), and there are SEVERAL squares where other alliances are holding from the start without big attrition, so may be this is not a specific H? thing, but a common behavior in this kind of tourney. Also remember some squares are not at hand for most of the very localized alliances.
That said, you are very welcome attacking our squares, it is a tourney after all ;-)
|
|
|
Gossip Boy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 259
|
Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 17:30 |
Kumomoto wrote:
Gossip Boy wrote:
tallimar was bloody,really than what will you say about arran and western realms and more than anything else the tallimar battle served as a propaganda of H?'s smartness and it has actually worked...no body dares to attack H?....congo for your smart tactics H? you 've already won the tourney i guess while all other alliances fight it out for 2nd and 3rd spot
NOTE casualties in arran ~500k
casualties in farra isle ~5k
i haven't done the calculation yet but the combined casualties of H? dominated flag is around 500k i guess
H? are really smart they deserve to win |
You profess to not be anti-H?, but you are clearly following an agenda here... Azura, for example, has 111k casualties. There are lots of non-H? squares with less than that. Selective fact picking is the sign of a propagandist.
(which is sad because this thread is supposed to be about the tourney and not yet another anti-H? platform)
|
If you wanna brand me as anti-H?,i ve no problems with that i know you 've faced some competition in tallimar and azura but you are occupying 9 squares don't you wanna tell about the other 7 (someone used selective fact picking i remember) and one thing finally if you feel that i wanna see H? suffer heavy losses than you are right i do and everybody does coz no body wanna see the winner having an easy ride (ALI wouldn't ve been remembered so much if he won all his matches in first round) but sadly that isn't happening.i am quite a small player but i am gonna definitely attack some H? squares
|
|
SugarFree
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 350
|
Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 14:41 |
Brids17 wrote:
Honestly, I don't know what they did in order to defend so well against you but I have seen armies take out much more than they lost. I kind of suspect it has something to do with stacking defense from the jungle bonus building but who knows. None the less, I don't think letting them win time and time again is really the answer here.
Population wise, it would only take two or three alliances to match or better their population. I kind of wish the Crowlitions would form together and do something but again, I noticed there's a general "they're too strong we're not going to bother" opinion going on so it's hard to even talk about taking squares from H? without being met with extreme pessimism. |
hehehe it's not just that they have the top pop... from what i see they are also the most heavily militarized ally of them all.
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 09:12 |
It's still fun no matter which way you want to paint it, congrats to all of those who are having a crack, and for those who aint, join in folks, this is one of the few times that the whole community accepts that anything goes.
|
|
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 03:09 |
Honestly, I don't know what they did in order to defend so well against you but I have seen armies take out much more than they lost. I kind of suspect it has something to do with stacking defense from the jungle bonus building but who knows. None the less, I don't think letting them win time and time again is really the answer here.
Population wise, it would only take two or three alliances to match or better their population. I kind of wish the Crowlitions would form together and do something but again, I noticed there's a general "they're too strong we're not going to bother" opinion going on so it's hard to even talk about taking squares from H? without being met with extreme pessimism.
|
|
|
Mandarins31
Forum Warrior
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 418
|
Posted: 28 Feb 2012 at 02:40 |
And seeing H? def ratios on any kind of terrain, it would be a big waste of units to do so... it would require the full top 5 or even more top alliances acting simultaneously to perform that kind of aim imo..
|
|