Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Mr Andersson
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 20 Jun 2011 at 18:06 |
1) Welcome Cerberus - love the graphics, and awaits what is coming!
2) Regarding the sov. exploit. Is it just me who is curious about to what extent this has been exploited in the game? That is a massive advantage if used. It's also "old news" and I have just presumed that it was known and had been fixed. Will there be any consequences for the players who have used this obvious exploit without reporting it?
|
MrA
|
|
lokifeyson
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 211
|
Posted: 20 Jun 2011 at 23:09 |
Welcome Cerberus :)
|
|
|
The_Dragon
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 103
|
Posted: 22 Jun 2011 at 06:49 |
Mr Andersson wrote:
2) Regarding the sov. exploit. Is it just me who is curious about to what extent this has been exploited in the game? That is a massive advantage if used. It's also "old news" and I have just presumed that it was known and had been fixed. Will there be any consequences for the players who have used this obvious exploit without reporting it? |
Yes, me too. I want to know what kind of punishment already given to those who exploit. That is a very big unfair advantage.
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: 23 Jun 2011 at 21:23 |
I had 1 of these glitch squares from back when i tested this and reported it. It just got corrected this afternoon.
I too am curious to know if anyone abused this glitch on a larger scale, though I don't really think the idea of 'punishment' is either appropriate or likely.
|
|
Createure
Postmaster General
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Points: 1191
|
Posted: 23 Jun 2011 at 21:29 |
system wrote:
Sovereign Structure Levelled Down At ? Sent By: System Received By: You Date: 23/06/2011 16:12:04 In accordance with 19JUN11's Patchnotes in the forum (and in the Release Notes section of The Herald) regarding the maintanance of Sovereign Structures at Levels in excess of the Underlying Sovereignty, a Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure located at [?] in [?] and owned by your town ? has been levelled down.
You are only maintaining an underlying Sovereignty Level of I at this location, and your maximum Sovereign Structure Level cannot exceed the underlying Sovereignty Level.
Your Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure has been reduced to Level I, and this has reduced this Sovereign Structure's bonus from +20.0000% to +5.0000%.
You can, of course, re-raise your underlying Sovereignty level at this location, and rebuild the structure if you wish, but you will need to maintain the underlying Sovereignty level at the same level (or higher) as the Sovereign Structure. |
Edited by Createure - 23 Jun 2011 at 21:31
|
|
Aneirin
Wordsmith
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 186
|
Posted: 23 Jun 2011 at 22:37 |
Createure wrote:
system wrote:
Sovereign Structure Levelled Down At ? Sent By: System Received By: You Date: 23/06/2011 16:12:04 In accordance with 19JUN11's Patchnotes in the forum (and in the Release Notes section of The Herald) regarding the maintanance of Sovereign Structures at Levels in excess of the Underlying Sovereignty, a Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure located at [?] in [?] and owned by your town ? has been levelled down.
You are only maintaining an underlying Sovereignty Level of I at this location, and your maximum Sovereign Structure Level cannot exceed the underlying Sovereignty Level.
Your Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure has been reduced to Level I, and this has reduced this Sovereign Structure's bonus from +20.0000% to +5.0000%.
You can, of course, re-raise your underlying Sovereignty level at this location, and rebuild the structure if you wish, but you will need to maintain the underlying Sovereignty level at the same level (or higher) as the Sovereign Structure. |
|
Oooo look the first culprit who took advantage of the exploit has been revealed. Followers of my postings will know that I am not surprised to find that it is my auld mate Creat - and who does he belong to? Why the squeaky clean we do no wrong Harmless? crew of course. rofl
He's not the only one in that alliance either and if they can convince the devs not to take away their ill gotten gains they will.
In his post above, The_Dragon of DLords wanted to know what kind of punishment those who took advantage of the sov. exploit should recieve? Now that Dlords realise that most of the cuplrits are members from their confederated allies Harmless they will stop asking questions and start dreaming up excuses.
|
|
Anjire
Postmaster
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
|
Posted: 23 Jun 2011 at 23:17 |
Aneirin wrote:
Createure wrote:
system wrote:
Sovereign Structure Levelled Down At ? Sent By: System Received By: You Date: 23/06/2011 16:12:04 In accordance with 19JUN11's Patchnotes in the forum (and in the Release Notes section of The Herald) regarding the maintanance of Sovereign Structures at Levels in excess of the Underlying Sovereignty, a Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure located at [?] in [?] and owned by your town ? has been levelled down.
You are only maintaining an underlying Sovereignty Level of I at this location, and your maximum Sovereign Structure Level cannot exceed the underlying Sovereignty Level.
Your Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure has been reduced to Level I, and this has reduced this Sovereign Structure's bonus from +20.0000% to +5.0000%.
You can, of course, re-raise your underlying Sovereignty level at this location, and rebuild the structure if you wish, but you will need to maintain the underlying Sovereignty level at the same level (or higher) as the Sovereign Structure. |
|
Oooo look the first culprit who took advantage of the exploit has been revealed. Followers of my postings will know that I am not surprised to find that it is my auld mate Creat - and who does he belong to? Why the squeaky clean we do no wrong Harmless? crew of course. rofl
He's not the only one in that alliance either and if they can convince the devs not to take away their ill gotten gains they will.
In his post above, The_Dragon of DLords wanted to know what kind of punishment those who took advantage of the sov. exploit should recieve? Now that Dlords realise that most of the cuplrits are members from their confederated allies Harmless they will stop asking questions and start dreaming up excuses.
|
As priorly posted by Createure:
I had 1 of these glitch squares from back when i tested this and reported it. It just got corrected this afternoon.
I too am curious to know if anyone abused this glitch on a larger scale, though I don't really think the idea of 'punishment' is either appropriate or likely.
Additionally as posted by Createure about this bug back in April:
Any other baseless accusations Aneirin?
|
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 24 Jun 2011 at 00:12 |
Aneirin wrote:
Createure wrote:
system wrote:
Sovereign Structure Levelled Down At ? Sent By: System Received By: You Date: 23/06/2011 16:12:04 In accordance with 19JUN11's Patchnotes in the forum (and in the Release Notes section of The Herald) regarding the maintanance of Sovereign Structures at Levels in excess of the Underlying Sovereignty, a Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure located at [?] in [?] and owned by your town ? has been levelled down.
You are only maintaining an underlying Sovereignty Level of I at this location, and your maximum Sovereign Structure Level cannot exceed the underlying Sovereignty Level.
Your Level IV Jousting Yard Sovereign Structure has been reduced to Level I, and this has reduced this Sovereign Structure's bonus from +20.0000% to +5.0000%.
You can, of course, re-raise your underlying Sovereignty level at this location, and rebuild the structure if you wish, but you will need to maintain the underlying Sovereignty level at the same level (or higher) as the Sovereign Structure. |
|
Oooo look the first culprit who took advantage of the exploit has been revealed. Followers of my postings will know that I am not surprised to find that it is my auld mate Creat - and who does he belong to? Why the squeaky clean we do no wrong Harmless? crew of course. rofl
He's not the only one in that alliance either and if they can convince the devs not to take away their ill gotten gains they will.
In his post above, The_Dragon of DLords wanted to know what kind of punishment those who took advantage of the sov. exploit should recieve? Now that Dlords realise that most of the cuplrits are members from their confederated allies Harmless they will stop asking questions and start dreaming up excuses. |
Aneirin the most truly tragic and pathetic trait you share with Lionz Heartz (if indeed you are not one and the same) is you seek attention and vindication from those who dislike you. And if not dislike, then at the least, pity. Your constant craving at vindication and acceptance (your refusal to walk away) I can only guess perhaps mask's the green eye of jealousy (that at this level, in this context, is really quite sad) or whatever name you give that axe you grind. The answers to your issues lie not with me, not with Creatueure, not with Harmless(?) nor the scores of others whom you have offended of put offside, but with you.
|
|
G0DsDestroyer
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Location: Ásgarð/Vanaheim
Status: Offline
Points: 975
|
Posted: 24 Jun 2011 at 03:56 |
He used to bother Aesir alot, looks like he's found bigger kids to play with
|
|
|
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 24 Jun 2011 at 07:12 |
Punishment or call it what you like,I don't think it is a viable option,how do you measure something like that so that it is deemed reasonable. This would just open up the preverbial can of worms, so good for those that took advantage of it while it lasted and now its gone we move on.
P.s I didnt use this tactic because I didnt know about it so I'm not standing alongside the guilty and trying to justify it,just dont think its such a big deal now that its been stopped.
|
|