HonoredMule wrote:
Oh noes, a siege. Maybe I'd have lost another building level or two. Just think of all those long minutes of resource production I'd have lost. And while his 500 units made an annoyance of themselves, what of the 3,500 troops that sat in his town?
H? was more concerned with keeping our smaller players out of battle so they'd have continued opportunity for growth. Military score holds no value over economic output, and Diablito knows he's not doing you any favors by cutting your teeth. He has already watched others rocket far ahead of him while he carefully groomed an army and single commander, and what has he gotten out of that? He knocked down one level of one of my buildings. I was rebuilt within the day. And we both know that's why White has instead chosen to harass our smallest members. You've already admitted defeat by your actions.
Also, perhaps you can explain to me how your 30+ commanders acquired experience while dead. Next time you place your armies in the hands of one dictator, make sure he has not myopically focused on one strength to the exclusion of even basic protection against other threats.
|
Ehm, I have 3 commanders at around lvl 30 and one lvl 8 commander and your intel about troop numbers are equally off, I had 4100 units defending me, I did however KILL 3.500 H? soldiers attacking me.
To this date you've not made ONE succesfull attack on my capital of Gay Paris (or a SINGLE white town as far as i'm aware of).
Where as we daily attack H? members with siege, knocking down upto a douzen buildings per day overall, yeah i'm sure your members think of this all as a mild inconvience.
We attack anyone wearing an H? tag because wearing an H? tag is showing support for your continued acts of aggression, you may speak of peace but diplomatic attacks, 24/7 negative spells on my city (for weeks before this war ever started) speak for themselves, you did what you could to provoke this war.
If these new players want to stop being attacked all they have to do is leave H? and all attacks cease immidately, they chose to join the largest alliance in the game, an alliance that conducted aggressive policies towards other alliances and by doing that they chose to take the risk of attack.
You whine and talk about honour and justice, but we all know what you are.
You cry to be left alone, to be left to grow, but when you've grown, when you're strong enough, you will set policy, you will write a sub-set of rules to those put down by the GM's, you will enforce YOUR ideas and opinions on this game and don't think for a godamn second I will permit it.
I'll fight this "utopia" of yours to my last soldier, and judging by our perfect attack/defence ratio, I dare say i'm doing pretty damn good.
You say I leave my members out to dry, I take care of my members, thats why they're tearing yours to pieces, thats why non of my members suffer in this war yet yours are wailing for help.
In White, we care about our new players, we don't just have them around for cannon fodder.
I'd like to ask the members of H? something directly. Do they tell you their plans? Do they include you in the planning process? Do they activly organice you? Do THEY ever send YOU resources? Or do they leave you in the dark, do they have you boost them so that they can win this war for you?
Well I have a news flash for you, 200k stone isn't going to win this war, your leaders have turtled up in a defensive position not even trying to mount an attack not defending a single member, just absorbing as much resources as they can and growing their score.
Well **** score, score doesn't matter, people matter, so you can take your score and shuv it up your ass HM, I don't give a sh*t where I am on the rankings, I care about my members.