Illy Troop Update |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | ||
Dabrelis
Greenhorn Joined: 08 Jan 2018 Status: Offline Points: 55 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would change places for Infantry and Ranged. Make Infantry best in Mountain (Dwarves are a mountain race and infantry) and Ranged best in Forest (Elves are a forest race and ranged). Just for the Tolkien.
|
||
Bill Cipher
Wordsmith Joined: 28 Mar 2016 Location: The Universe Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Awe you think i'm trolling how adorable.
|
||
d-a-r-o-r-w-o pb wlph kdv frph wr exuq. l lqyrnh wkh dqflhqw srzhu wkdw l pdb uhwxuq
|
||
Morose
New Poster Joined: 21 Feb 2018 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yeah, I understand that desire to Tolenize but I tried to keep everything as true to what Illy already had. Any changes made need to try and stay close to established Illy constraints to not only keep players happy but also not completely upend established town placements and conventions.
I also desired ideas that do not fundamentally change the game code or how it works. All my changes are simply differences to already programmed values that require a handful of find and replace integers. Edited by Morose - 09 Apr 2018 at 21:19 |
||
Spartacus
New Poster Joined: 15 Sep 2017 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Morose, you leave out one important factor in your analysis - crafted gear. Most people think this is something you use for commanders or elite squadrons. It isn't and you need to do the math on it. You can, for example, use cav effectively on every terrain type except buildings - likewise other types. If you change the scores you need to evaluate the effects of equipment on the new scores and I think you'd find a new but different set of troop configurations.
The main reasons that equipment is not used as it might be are 1) the 100% drop rate in towns, 2) most military types don't hunt much to gather enough skins, 3) most players don't build enough specialised smiths etc to craft rapidly and 4) consequently gear is more expensive than it should be. Remember that the bonuses add not multiply so a 60% weapon bonus and a -15% terrain is still +45%. The terrain modifier can be largely eliminated by the right gear - especially if the other guy has the wrong gear or no gear.
|
||
Morose
New Poster Joined: 21 Feb 2018 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
You point out the reasons why crafted gear is not used large scale, but that being said while I changed numbers I did so in a way that doesn't change crafted gear in a meaningful way. Since I amplified terrain bonuses and penalties, it is now even harder to counteract the effect of bad terrain. Look at it this way, in my calculations Sentinels are bad at defending on plains. Plains gear gives 120% bonus to defense, giving a sentinel an aggregate defense on plains still well below the attack value of cavalry (the attacker of choice on plains). An army of 100k sentinels (not hard to aquire) fully equipped would have a much better advantage for one fight, then when most of the gear is lost it will take another crazy amount of time to accrue that amount of crafted gear again. Because of this, crafted gear is best left to commanders and elite squadrons to help offset losses of larger armies.
|
||
Tink XX
Forum Warrior Joined: 16 Dec 2014 Status: Offline Points: 201 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yeah the only time you would have fully equipped armies with gear is in a city behind the wall. The wall still delivers the main bonus in that situation. Sure the numbers would shift around some but the change would affect everyone equally. I think it's a worthwhile trade-off to achieve a better overall balance.
Edited by Tink XX - 10 Apr 2018 at 01:22 |
||
Lord Stanley
New Poster Joined: 12 Sep 2015 Location: US Status: Offline Points: 39 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Morose,
I like your ideas in this setting. It combines creating more flexible and appropriate troop values and usage while not requiring the devs to rewrite the game to do so. I have 2 additional suggestions, albeit more involved than yours. 1) to create some random factor for leadership. In real battles a smaller, less powerful army may defeat a larger one due to the decision making of the leaders. Perhaps rather than just a simple increase in attack value that Heroism provides, how about a Leadership/Military IQ commander bonus that would offer some increase percentage likelihood of winning a battle that cannot be calculated exactly. This would make military battles a little less exact to calculate and a bit more interesting to see play out. As of right now, the key to military victory in a war appears to be troop production. If you can outproduce your enemy, you will eventually win. With this variable, it would make things a little more interesting I think. A variable in the game that I played before this significantly affected gameplay in a way that this could. In that game, Grepolis, launch times could vary up to 10 seconds either direction from the time the send button was actually pressed. Many times, exact timing to the second was of utmost importance. One or two seconds could be the difference between losing or protecting a city. In Illy, the mechanics are different so a variable timer would not make a significant difference, but varying commander win percentage would. 2) How about making the Chancery actually worth something in your city? The small percentage benefit in gold and RP reduction you get for just L1 sov really does not justify the hourly resource cost. Perhaps if COE were more powerful, like giving a benefit at every level, it would be a tool that could be used to actually increase usable sov. This would be better for those in military and those not as well. Lord Stanley
|
||
//elgea.illyriad.co.uk/a/b/309517/av.jpg
|
||
Spartacus
New Poster Joined: 15 Sep 2017 Location: Ireland Status: Offline Points: 33 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Let me make a few points on this. 1. You say it takes a crazy time to craft gear - no it doesn't. The creatures that provide the raw materials (other than for plains gear) are in abundance. Lots of skinners and multiple specialised smiths produce the gear faster than the raw gear - its a problem if you're running cities of 5-8k pop as you havn't raised your building levels far enough - but that's a philosophical problem with some people's style of play. I regularly sent out 10k fully equipped armies - the equivalent of 22k or more - I only have to rebuild 10k and the equipment in parallel over multiple towns. I have sent out armies up to 30k fully equipped - the reaction tends to be 'Wow'. 2. Having an idea and getting your alliance members to come in and say 'great idea' is a bit rich. (Please don't take that as a troll but you have to know it makes your motives suspect). Walled towns surrounded by plains is what twelfth century wars looked like with the walled city having the major advantage. Changing Illy so that towns can be more easily taken would only be welcomed by a few in Illy. Why not invent cannons? 3. The thing the devs could do without too much bother as they obviously have to do the calculation for battle resolution would be to put radio buttons on the army screen for the terrain type you are attacking and city wall levels, day/night/animals and give a proper reading for attack defence scores. Lots of people can't manage the math and only have the slimmest idea of what each piece of equipment does - show them the scores and they'll develop better instincts. You've surely scavenged daft equipment from battles? 4. The problem with your sheets is that they are only 2d and not accurate when the third and fourth dimensions (weapon and armour) are taken into account. 5. Here's a suggestion that's easy to implement. Introduce weather to Illy. I know it's a big place but we shouldn't really object, in a magic kingdom, to having the same weather everywhere for a day at a time. Resource production varies by season so why not vary terrain bonuses by weather - Knights on plains would surely perform worse in rain! I'm suggesting that we know today's weather and our mages can accurately predict tomorrow's weather, We get a new forecast at midnight. I'm suggesting the terrain modifiers would be modified up or down between +5 and -5 depending on the weather - so 11 weathers. Tomorrow's modifier would be today's modifier +/-1 with 50% prob with obvious arrangements at the boundaries. Timing of sending would now matter and sending from farther away involves more risk as the weather may change. So, a total of two new variables, one of which is to be added into the battle calculation and a daily weather forecast announcement - put it in the 'world strategies' graphic on Attack Stats that can't be read anyhow and a whole new set of conversations about the weather which should be very attractive to British players. (Sorry! That's a troll.) 6. The 100% drop rate in towns has always irritated me especially if the attacker wins the battle - surely the winning army would be able to carry home one piece of their dead comrades' equipment a piece. |
||
Morose
New Poster Joined: 21 Feb 2018 Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I am not sure if you don't understand the changes or think I am a complete Illy noob, but let me reply:
1 - Yes, it is a fact that it takes much more time to create crafted gear as it does troops. For instance, in a standard easy to do military town you can produce 920 sentinels per day (300% sov bonus). 1 bowyer level 20 and specialized for 1 type of bow can make 124 crafted bows per day. There are 4 terrain types, so you would need 4 towns with bowyers to supply your armies for the 4 terrains. If you had 2 level 20 bowyers you could produce 192 crafted bows per day, and if you had 3 it would be 216 crafted bows per day. In order to keep up with production, you would need at least 2 level 20 skinners guilds per town. Running the cost numbers, the going rate of plains materials is 10k gold per bow, hills is 1.5k per bow, mountains is 4.5k per bow, and forests is 3.4k per bow. If we average that out, you get approx 5k gold per crafted bow. This would cost you approximately 1 million gold per day per town in order to equip your sentinels with bows only for war. 216 crafted bows per day is the equivalent of 130 more sentinels in terms of military power per day due to their equipment bonus. Conversely, you could increase your sov to 400% and produce more sentinels per day. An extra 100% sov gets you an extra 230 sentinels and costs you 85k gold in additional sov upkeep and 1.1mil of basics per day. Now you would have to ship in basics, which would cost you approx 1.1mil gold per day, so the cost is basically the same. Now let's throw in the rest of the variables. First, if you are hunting your own 216 animal parts per day you are losing troops due to the hunting and killing. Secondly, at the time of writing this there are approximately only 5-10k of all of these specific parts in total for sale at Centrum. Even best case scenario you are unable to keep up with demand for animal parts and you will not have full ques at all times. Bottom line is equipment is great, and I use equipment all the time. It is not feasible to use in most attacks or defense during a conflict due to production limitations. 2 - Can't help who is active in the forums, and it does seem a bit trollish. I personally don't care what 12th century warfare looked like, since this is a fantasy realm with very little in common other than it's subject matter. Furthermore, the point of the game is to provide a balanced game play where possible, sometimes sacrificing real world logic (i.e. 50k knights being able to charge up a mountain or through a large forest). The main point of the suggestion was to make it harder to take towns that are not surrounded by plains by changing the way certain troops perform on said terrain. Right now if a siege lands on a mountain or buildings the advantage is very much in favor of the defenders (sieger). With my proposed changes, whatever troop type is defending has a counter to basically every terrain, allowing for the breaking of those specific sieges easier. If you actually read the PPH sheet I provided, you can see the balance between all troops and all terrain. Also, I have made it somewhat easier to siege on plains which right now is complete suicide. All in all it is a much more balanced system. 3 - Not sure of the point here, the math is quite simple and once again yes equipment is used all of the time. 4 - Once again weapons and armor simply change the number in a very linear fashion and is quite easy to figure. Once again, the weapons and armor changes nothing of the balance since it is an outlier now the same as it would be after the changes. They still function the same with the same percentages. 5 - My whole entire point was to show how changes within the code and requiring absolutely no rework or redesign could help further balance the military game play much as the infantry updates did, and I provided the proof behind the concept to show this fact. I have been playing Illyriad since 2012, have taken part in multiple wars and fought in countless battles and taken part in a myriad of different strategies. I and many others who fight see that there is a certain amount of staleness to the combat system, and these changes were simply suggested to solve this problem.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |