Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Confederations
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Confederations

 Post Reply Post Reply
Poll Question: See below
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
0 [0.00%]
9 [19.57%]
14 [30.43%]
4 [8.70%]
10 [21.74%]
5 [10.87%]
0 [0.00%]
4 [8.70%]
You can not vote in this poll

Author
Aurordan View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aurordan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Confederations
    Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 03:46
What do you consider to be the obligations of confederation with another alliance?  Loosely continued from me shouting at Global Chat.

Edited by Aurordan - 23 Jan 2012 at 03:57
Back to Top
invictusa View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 16 Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote invictusa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 03:50
you cant pick more than 1?
Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 204
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aurordan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 03:56
You should have been able too...Ermm

Just pick what you would consider the most important I guess

Yes, you just have to vote twice.


Edited by Aurordan - 23 Jan 2012 at 03:58
Back to Top
dunnoob View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 106
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote dunnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 05:30
Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:

you just have to vote twice.

Oops, sorry, count one "other" as "economic"+"unconditional defense"+"conditional attack"Embarrassed
Back to Top
abstractdream View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2011
Location: TX, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 154
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote abstractdream Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 05:44
I am curious about what pathfinding will do for Confeds and NAPs.

Confederation, to me means "we are now partners."
Mutual defense is the overriding principle. Support with resources and if required troops or what have you.
I also think freedom of movement within and through the respective member alliances territory is defacto for now and should be included as part of a Confederation when pathfinding does happen.
There is one other thing that I think would be of use for a Confederation as well, and that's extradition. In the event of a crime, the suspect is "virtually" extradited for "trial" by the alliance of the alleged victim.
These things give a Confederation some punch. Without them, it's just a NAP.
Bonfyr Verboo, TLR
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1442
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote HonoredMule Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 05:52
I have a pretty thorough definition of what I consider appropriate requirements upon a confederate--if you really cared about the specifics you could review them at http://arcanum-illyria.com/wiki/Elgea:Harmless/Treaties.  There's no grounds for declaring any clear standard.  The word itself simply means forming a league, standing together.  It's not even defined by the word itself whether that stand be in all things or only in context of a singular common issue, or how that mutual support be demonstrated.

That said, however, I believe the standard Harmless uses (as linked above) is a good example of what confederates typically and reasonably want from each other.  Its sort of a scale...the more one party wants from the other, the better the first party's justification needs to be for demanding it.  But the theoretical limit on what one party would ask of the other is limited only by how dire or extreme the causal circumstances can be.  The greater the need and/or the greater the innocence, the greater the confederate obligations.

If you really wanted to boil it down to a simple caption though, "unconditional defense plus conditional attack" serves well.
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
Back to Top
Albatross View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 11 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 265
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Albatross Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Jan 2012 at 12:48
It's whatever you agree.


It's not really relevant to try to codify it, unless you had automatic game mechanics that acted on details of diplomatic stance, e.g. (1) if an alliance neutral to you attacks a confed alliance, do they then become enemies? or (2) Can an 'at war' alliance have their troops travel through your sovereign land, or (3) Can you trade with a player you are 'at war' with even though you're not taking part in the war?
Back to Top
Cerridwyn View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 12 Sep 2011
Location: So. Cal.
Status: Offline
Points: 42
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Cerridwyn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 Jan 2012 at 03:18
I think it is up to the people who devise the treaty/agreement. It should be whatever they want it to be, nothing more, nothing less.


Cerridwyn ~-~ Cerdwyn

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down